166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25070055)
1. Influence of colonoscopy quality measures on patients' colonoscopist selection.
Solad Y; Wang C; Laine L; Deng Y; Schwartz H; Ciarleglio MM; Aslanian HR
Am J Gastroenterol; 2015 Feb; 110(2):215-9. PubMed ID: 25070055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Quality indicators for screening colonoscopy and colonoscopist performance and the subsequent risk of interval colorectal cancer: a systematic review.
Lund M; Trads M; Njor SH; Erichsen R; Andersen B
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2019 Nov; 17(11):2265-2300. PubMed ID: 31188154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Temporal trends and variability of colonoscopy performance in a gastroenterology practice.
le Clercq CM; Mooi RJ; Winkens B; Salden BN; Bakker CM; van Nunen AB; Keulen EP; de Ridder RJ; Masclee AA; Sanduleanu S
Endoscopy; 2016 Mar; 48(3):248-55. PubMed ID: 26808394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Colonoscopy quality measures: experience from the NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme.
Lee TJ; Rutter MD; Blanks RG; Moss SM; Goddard AF; Chilton A; Nickerson C; McNally RJ; Patnick J; Rees CJ
Gut; 2012 Jul; 61(7):1050-7. PubMed ID: 21940723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Determination of withdrawal times in individualized opportunistic screening colonoscopies.
Zhan Q; Xiang L; Zhao X; An S; Zhou Y; Xu Y; Li A; Liu S
Medicine (Baltimore); 2019 Aug; 98(32):e16819. PubMed ID: 31393413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Factors determining the quality of screening colonoscopy: a prospective study on adenoma detection rates, from 12,134 examinations (Berlin colonoscopy project 3, BECOP-3).
Adler A; Wegscheider K; Lieberman D; Aminalai A; Aschenbeck J; Drossel R; Mayr M; Mroß M; Scheel M; Schröder A; Gerber K; Stange G; Roll S; Gauger U; Wiedenmann B; Altenhofen L; Rosch T
Gut; 2013 Feb; 62(2):236-41. PubMed ID: 22442161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Advanced adenoma detection rate is independent of nonadvanced adenoma detection rate.
Greenspan M; Rajan KB; Baig A; Beck T; Mobarhan S; Melson J
Am J Gastroenterol; 2013 Aug; 108(8):1286-92. PubMed ID: 23711625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The 'ins and outs' of colonoscopy at Wits Donald Gordon Medical Centre, South Africa: A practice audit of the outpatient endoscopy unit.
Bouter C; Barrow P; Bizos D; Bobat B; Devar J; Harran N; Joseph C; Mahomed A; Oettle J; Ramos J; Seabi M; Kgabage G; Gaylard P; Surridge D; Etheredge H; Fabian J; Lutrin D; Karlsson K
S Afr Med J; 2020 Nov; 110(12):1186-1190. PubMed ID: 33403963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The impact of exclusion criteria on a physician's adenoma detection rate.
Marcondes FO; Dean KM; Schoen RE; Leffler DA; Rose S; Morris M; Mehrotra A
Gastrointest Endosc; 2015 Oct; 82(4):668-75. PubMed ID: 26385275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Colonoscopic factors associated with adenoma detection in a national colorectal cancer screening program.
Lee TJ; Rees CJ; Blanks RG; Moss SM; Nickerson C; Wright KC; James PW; McNally RJ; Patnick J; Rutter MD
Endoscopy; 2014 Mar; 46(3):203-11. PubMed ID: 24473907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Impact of a quarterly report card on colonoscopy quality measures.
Kahi CJ; Ballard D; Shah AS; Mears R; Johnson CS
Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 Jun; 77(6):925-31. PubMed ID: 23472996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Adenoma detection rate: the real indicator of quality in colonoscopy.
Millan MS; Gross P; Manilich E; Church JM
Dis Colon Rectum; 2008 Aug; 51(8):1217-20. PubMed ID: 18500502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Public reporting of colonoscopy quality is associated with an increase in endoscopist adenoma detection rate.
Abdul-Baki H; Schoen RE; Dean K; Rose S; Leffler DA; Kuganeswaran E; Morris M; Carrell D; Mehrotra A
Gastrointest Endosc; 2015 Oct; 82(4):676-82. PubMed ID: 26385276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Physician report cards and implementing standards of practice are both significantly associated with improved screening colonoscopy quality.
Keswani RN; Yadlapati R; Gleason KM; Ciolino JD; Manka M; O'Leary KJ; Barnard C; Pandolfino JE
Am J Gastroenterol; 2015 Aug; 110(8):1134-9. PubMed ID: 25869388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Point-of-care, peer-comparator colonoscopy practice audit: The Canadian Association of Gastroenterology Quality Program--Endoscopy.
Armstrong D; Hollingworth R; Macintosh D; Chen Y; Daniels S; Gittens S; Bridges R; Sinclair P; Dubé C
Can J Gastroenterol; 2011 Jan; 25(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 21258663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Screening colonoscopy: High quality regardless of endoscopist specialty.
Sapci I; Aiello A; Gorgun E; Rizk M; Delaney CP; Steele SR; Valente MA
Am J Surg; 2019 Mar; 217(3):442-444. PubMed ID: 30268418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Adenoma detection rate metrics in colorectal cancer surveillance colonoscopy.
Tjaden JM; Hause JA; Berger D; Duveneck SK; Jakate SM; Orkin BA; Hubbard EL; Melson JE
Surg Endosc; 2018 Jul; 32(7):3108-3113. PubMed ID: 29340817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Colonoscopist Performance and Colorectal Cancer Risk After Adenoma Removal to Stratify Surveillance: Two Nationwide Observational Studies.
Wieszczy P; Waldmann E; Løberg M; Regula J; Rupinski M; Bugajski M; Gray K; Kalager M; Ferlitsch M; Kaminski MF; Bretthauer M
Gastroenterology; 2021 Mar; 160(4):1067-1074.e6. PubMed ID: 33065063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. High quality of screening colonoscopy in Austria is not dependent on endoscopist specialty or setting.
Kozbial K; Reinhart K; Heinze G; Zwatz C; Bannert C; Salzl P; Waldmann E; Britto-Arias M; Ferlitsch A; Trauner M; Weiss W; Ferlitsch M
Endoscopy; 2015 Mar; 47(3):207-16. PubMed ID: 25412094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Should Assessment of Quality Indicator of Colonoscopy Be Varied Depending on the Colonoscopic Technique Level?
Choung BS; Kim SH; Yoo KB; Seo SY; Kim IH; Lee SO; Lee ST; Kim SW
Dig Dis Sci; 2016 Mar; 61(3):731-6. PubMed ID: 26576553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
