These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25070575)

  • 1. High rotation rate behavior of cervical spine segments in flexion and extension.
    Barker JB; Cronin DS; Chandrashekar N
    J Biomech Eng; 2014 Dec; 136(12):121004. PubMed ID: 25070575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Experimental flexion/extension data corridors for validation of finite element models of the young, normal cervical spine.
    Wheeldon JA; Pintar FA; Knowles S; Yoganandan N
    J Biomech; 2006; 39(2):375-80. PubMed ID: 16321642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Incorporating ligament laxity in a finite element model for the upper cervical spine.
    Lasswell TL; Cronin DS; Medley JB; Rasoulinejad P
    Spine J; 2017 Nov; 17(11):1755-1764. PubMed ID: 28673824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Finite element analysis of moment-rotation relationships for human cervical spine.
    Zhang QH; Teo EC; Ng HW; Lee VS
    J Biomech; 2006; 39(1):189-93. PubMed ID: 16271604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Motion analysis study on sensitivity of finite element model of the cervical spine to geometry.
    Zafarparandeh I; Erbulut DU; Ozer AF
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2016 Jul; 230(7):700-6. PubMed ID: 27107032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Motion changes in adjacent segments due to moderate and severe degeneration in C5-C6 disc: a poroelastic C3-T1 finite element model study.
    Hussain M; Natarajan RN; An HS; Andersson GB
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Apr; 35(9):939-47. PubMed ID: 20375779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cervical spine segmental vertebral motion in healthy volunteers feigning restriction of neck flexion and extension.
    Puglisi F; Strimpakos N; Papathanasiou M; Kapreli E; Bonelli A; Sgambetterra S; Ferrari R
    Int J Legal Med; 2007 Sep; 121(5):337-40. PubMed ID: 16847699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Lower Cervical Spine Motion Segment Computational Model Validation: Kinematic and Kinetic Response for Quasi-Static and Dynamic Loading.
    Barker JB; Cronin DS; Nightingale RW
    J Biomech Eng; 2017 Jun; 139(6):. PubMed ID: 28418508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Effects of novel angled cervical disc replacement on facet joint stress].
    Bai C; Zhang W; Ling W; Tian Z; Dang X; Wang K
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Apr; 26(4):390-5. PubMed ID: 22568314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Finite element study on anterior transpedicular screw-artificial vertebral body fixation in lower cervical spine].
    Wu W; Sun P; Liu X; Chen C; Wu C; Ouyang J
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Dec; 27(12):1466-70. PubMed ID: 24640367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Motion compensation associated with single-level cervical fusion: where does the lost motion go?
    Schwab JS; Diangelo DJ; Foley KT
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Oct; 31(21):2439-48. PubMed ID: 17023853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Validation of a C2-C7 cervical spine finite element model using specimen-specific flexibility data.
    Kallemeyn N; Gandhi A; Kode S; Shivanna K; Smucker J; Grosland N
    Med Eng Phys; 2010 Jun; 32(5):482-9. PubMed ID: 20392660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Biomechanics of adjacent segments after a multilevel cervical corpectomy using anterior, posterior, and combined anterior-posterior instrumentation techniques: a finite element model study.
    Hussain M; Nassr A; Natarajan RN; An HS; Andersson GB
    Spine J; 2013 Jun; 13(6):689-96. PubMed ID: 23578989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Biomechanical analysis of the intact and destabilized sheep cervical spine.
    DeVries NA; Gandhi AA; Fredericks DC; Grosland NM; Smucker JD
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Jul; 37(16):E957-63. PubMed ID: 22391441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of two-level total disc replacement on cervical spine kinematics.
    Phillips FM; Tzermiadianos MN; Voronov LI; Havey RM; Carandang G; Dooris A; Patwardhan AG
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Oct; 34(22):E794-9. PubMed ID: 19829242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Adjacent-level range of motion and intradiscal pressure after posterior cervical decompression and fixation: an in vitro human cadaveric model.
    Kretzer RM; Hsu W; Hu N; Umekoji H; Jallo GI; McAfee PC; Tortolani PJ; Cunningham BW
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Jun; 37(13):E778-85. PubMed ID: 22228326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Pediatric and adult three-dimensional cervical spine kinematics: effect of age and sex through overall motion.
    Greaves LL; Van Toen C; Melnyk A; Koenig L; Zhu Q; Tredwell S; Mulpuri K; Cripton PA
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Jul; 34(16):1650-7. PubMed ID: 19770607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Do cervical collars and cervicothoracic orthoses effectively stabilize the injured cervical spine? A biomechanical investigation.
    Ivancic PC
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Jun; 38(13):E767-74. PubMed ID: 23486409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Biomechanical evaluation of occipitocervicothoracic fusion: impact of partial or sequential fixation.
    Cheng BC; Hafez MA; Cunningham B; Serhan H; Welch WC
    Spine J; 2008; 8(5):821-6. PubMed ID: 17981098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sensitivity, reliability and accuracy of the instant center of rotation calculation in the cervical spine during in vivo dynamic flexion-extension.
    Baillargeon E; Anderst WJ
    J Biomech; 2013 Feb; 46(4):670-6. PubMed ID: 23317757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.