These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25070634)

  • 1. Informative Bayesian Model Selection: a method for identifying interactions in genome-wide data.
    Aflakparast M; Masoudi-Nejad A; Bozorgmehr JH; Visweswaran S
    Mol Biosyst; 2014 Oct; 10(10):2654-62. PubMed ID: 25070634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. SNPHarvester: a filtering-based approach for detecting epistatic interactions in genome-wide association studies.
    Yang C; He Z; Wan X; Yang Q; Xue H; Yu W
    Bioinformatics; 2009 Feb; 25(4):504-11. PubMed ID: 19098029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A Bayesian model for detection of high-order interactions among genetic variants in genome-wide association studies.
    Wang J; Joshi T; Valliyodan B; Shi H; Liang Y; Nguyen HT; Zhang J; Xu D
    BMC Genomics; 2015 Nov; 16():1011. PubMed ID: 26607428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cuckoo search epistasis: a new method for exploring significant genetic interactions.
    Aflakparast M; Salimi H; Gerami A; Dubé MP; Visweswaran S; Masoudi-Nejad A
    Heredity (Edinb); 2014 Jun; 112(6):666-74. PubMed ID: 24549111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bayesian inference of epistatic interactions in case-control studies.
    Zhang Y; Liu JS
    Nat Genet; 2007 Sep; 39(9):1167-73. PubMed ID: 17721534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. bNEAT: a Bayesian network method for detecting epistatic interactions in genome-wide association studies.
    Han B; Chen XW
    BMC Genomics; 2011; 12 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S9. PubMed ID: 21989368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A Bayesian method for identifying genetic interactions.
    Visweswaran S; Wong AK; Barmada MM
    AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2009 Nov; 2009():673-7. PubMed ID: 20351939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A Bayesian clustering approach for detecting gene-gene interactions in high-dimensional genotype data.
    Chen SP; Huang GH
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2014 Jun; 13(3):275-97. PubMed ID: 24846958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mapping the genetic architecture of complex traits in experimental populations.
    Yang J; Zhu J; Williams RW
    Bioinformatics; 2007 Jun; 23(12):1527-36. PubMed ID: 17459962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fast detection of high-order epistatic interactions in genome-wide association studies using information theoretic measure.
    Leem S; Jeong HH; Lee J; Wee K; Sohn KA
    Comput Biol Chem; 2014 Jun; 50():19-28. PubMed ID: 24581733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. bgc: Software for Bayesian estimation of genomic clines.
    Gompert Z; Buerkle CA
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2012 Nov; 12(6):1168-76. PubMed ID: 22978657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. INTERSNP: genome-wide interaction analysis guided by a priori information.
    Herold C; Steffens M; Brockschmidt FF; Baur MP; Becker T
    Bioinformatics; 2009 Dec; 25(24):3275-81. PubMed ID: 19837719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bayesian neural networks for detecting epistasis in genetic association studies.
    Beam AL; Motsinger-Reif A; Doyle J
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2014 Nov; 15(1):368. PubMed ID: 25413600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Application of Bayesian genomic prediction methods to genome-wide association analyses.
    Wolc A; Dekkers JCM
    Genet Sel Evol; 2022 May; 54(1):31. PubMed ID: 35562659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Genome-wide association studies.
    Yang TH; Kon M; DeLisi C
    Methods Mol Biol; 2013; 939():233-51. PubMed ID: 23192550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. SNP selection and classification of genome-wide SNP data using stratified sampling random forests.
    Wu Q; Ye Y; Liu Y; Ng MK
    IEEE Trans Nanobioscience; 2012 Sep; 11(3):216-27. PubMed ID: 22987127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Alternative methods for H1 simulations in genome-wide association studies.
    Perduca V; Sinoquet C; Mourad R; Nuel G
    Hum Hered; 2012; 73(2):95-104. PubMed ID: 22472690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A mixed two-stage method for detecting interactions in genomewide association studies.
    Zuo Y; Kang G
    J Theor Biol; 2010 Feb; 262(4):576-83. PubMed ID: 19896954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. BayesKAT: bayesian optimal kernel-based test for genetic association studies reveals joint genetic effects in complex diseases.
    Das Adhikari S; Cui Y; Wang J
    Brief Bioinform; 2024 Mar; 25(3):. PubMed ID: 38653490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Tag SNP selection in genotype data for maximizing SNP prediction accuracy.
    Halperin E; Kimmel G; Shamir R
    Bioinformatics; 2005 Jun; 21 Suppl 1():i195-203. PubMed ID: 15961458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.