These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25070723)

  • 1. [Comparison of two screening questionnaires for patients with low back pain. Collation of risk factors for chronification].
    Schmidt CO; Lindena G; Pfingsten M; Kohlmann T; Chenot JF
    Schmerz; 2014 Aug; 28(4):365-73. PubMed ID: 25070723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Construct and predictive validity of the German Örebro questionnaire short form for psychosocial risk factor screening of patients with low back pain.
    Schmidt CO; Kohlmann T; Pfingsten M; Lindena G; Marnitz U; Pfeifer K; Chenot JF
    Eur Spine J; 2016 Jan; 25(1):325-332. PubMed ID: 26310842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [HWS-whiplash injury--the doctor is in charge].
    Oppel U
    Orthopade; 2007 Aug; 36(8):761-2. PubMed ID: 17657477
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Proving whiplash injury cases in court.
    Jakubiec P
    Arch Med Sadowej Kryminol; 2019; 69(4):208-221. PubMed ID: 32564577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. HKF-R 10 - screening for predicting chronicity in acute low back pain (LBP): a prospective clinical trial.
    Neubauer E; Junge A; Pirron P; Seemann H; Schiltenwolf M
    Eur J Pain; 2006 Aug; 10(6):559-66. PubMed ID: 16202634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Studies of whiplash trauma critically analyzed].
    Orthopade; 2007 Apr; 36(4):379-80. PubMed ID: 17387447
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Whiplash injuries].
    Huittinen VM
    Duodecim; 1995; 111(17):1700-3. PubMed ID: 9273292
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Screening for yellow flags in first-time acute low back pain: reliability and validity of a Norwegian version of the Acute Low Back Pain Screening Questionnaire.
    Grotle M; Vøllestad NK; Brox JI
    Clin J Pain; 2006 Jun; 22(5):458-67. PubMed ID: 16772801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Measuring psychosocial variables in patients with (sub) acute low back pain complaints, at risk for chronicity: a validation study of the Acute Low Back Pain Screening Questionnaire-Dutch Language Version.
    Heneweer H; van Woudenberg NJ; van Genderen F; Vanhees L; Wittink H
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Feb; 35(4):447-52. PubMed ID: 20110835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Predicting Persistent Back Symptoms by Psychosocial Risk Factors: Validity Criteria for the ÖMPSQ and the HKF-R 10 in Germany.
    Riewe E; Neubauer E; Pfeifer AC; Schiltenwolf M
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(7):e0158850. PubMed ID: 27442020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Transcultural adaption and psychometric properties of the STarT Back Screening Tool among Finnish low back pain patients.
    Piironen S; Paananen M; Haapea M; Hupli M; Zitting P; Ryynänen K; Takala EP; Korniloff K; Hill JC; Häkkinen A; Karppinen J
    Eur Spine J; 2016 Jan; 25(1):287-295. PubMed ID: 25672805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Medico-legal aspects of road traffic accidents.
    Mayou R
    J Psychosom Res; 1995 Aug; 39(6):789-98. PubMed ID: 8568736
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison between the STarT Back Screening Tool and the Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire: Which tool for what purpose? A semi-systematic review.
    Lheureux A; Berquin A
    Ann Phys Rehabil Med; 2019 May; 62(3):178-188. PubMed ID: 30342997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Avoidance-endurance fast screening (AE-FS) : Content and predictive validity of a 9‑item screening instrument for patients with unspecific subacute low back pain].
    Wolff SV; Willburger R; Hallner D; Rusu AC; Rusche H; Schulte T; Hasenbring MI
    Schmerz; 2018 Aug; 32(4):283-292. PubMed ID: 29987513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Positive recovery for low-risk injuries screened by the short form - Örebro musculoskeletal pain screening questionnaire following road traffic injury: evidence from an inception cohort study in New South Wales, Australia.
    Nguyen H; Rebbeck T; Kifley A; Jagnoor J; Dinh M; Shetty A; Nicholas M; Cameron ID
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2019 Nov; 20(1):531. PubMed ID: 31722704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Value of Prognostic Screening for Patients With Low Back Pain in Secondary Care.
    Karran EL; Traeger AC; McAuley JH; Hillier SL; Yau YH; Moseley GL
    J Pain; 2017 Jun; 18(6):673-686. PubMed ID: 28153805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The development of the Dutch version of the Fremantle Back Awareness Questionnaire.
    Janssens L; Goossens N; Wand BM; Pijnenburg M; Thys T; Brumagne S
    Musculoskelet Sci Pract; 2017 Dec; 32():84-91. PubMed ID: 28917134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reliability and screening ability of the StarT Back screening tool in patients with low back pain in physiotherapy practice, a cohort study.
    Robinson HS; Dagfinrud H
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2017 May; 18(1):232. PubMed ID: 28569152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Whiplash injury and "railway spine" (II)].
    Thomann KD; Rauschmann M
    Versicherungsmedizin; 2004 Dec; 56(4):183-6. PubMed ID: 15633771
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Developing and testing a measure of consultation-based reassurance for people with low back pain in primary care: a cross-sectional study.
    Holt N; Pincus T
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2016 Jul; 17():277. PubMed ID: 27405870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.