651 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25070914)
1. Penile prostheses and the litigious patient: a legal database review.
Sunaryo PL; Colaco M; Terlecki R
J Sex Med; 2014 Oct; 11(10):2589-94. PubMed ID: 25070914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Descriptive Analysis of Federal and State Interventional Pain Malpractice Litigation in the United States: A Pilot Investigation.
Kamath D; McIntyre S; Byerly S; Agarwal N; Kamath P; Peskin E; Gupta R; Roy S; Schwartz R; Kaye AD; Viswanath O; Urits I; Horn DB
Pain Physician; 2020 Jul; 23(4):413-422. PubMed ID: 32709176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Legal Review of Vasectomy Litigation and the Variables Impacting Trial Outcomes.
Blazek AJ; Belle JD; Deibert MP; Deibert CM
Urology; 2019 Sep; 131():120-124. PubMed ID: 31195010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Penile prosthesis implantation compares favorably in malpractice outcomes to other common urological procedures: findings from a malpractice insurance database.
Chason J; Sausville J; Kramer AC
J Sex Med; 2009 Aug; 6(8):2111-4. PubMed ID: 19453882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Malpractice litigation in elective lumbar spinal fusion: a comprehensive review of reported legal claims in the U.S. in the past 50 years.
Zhang JK; Del Valle AJ; Alexopoulos G; Patel N; Van Nispen J; Patel M; Xu E; Mercier P; Kohn NA; Mattei TA
Spine J; 2022 Aug; 22(8):1254-1264. PubMed ID: 35381361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Malpractice litigation following spine surgery.
Daniels AH; Ruttiman R; Eltorai AEM; DePasse JM; Brea BA; Palumbo MA
J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Oct; 27(4):470-475. PubMed ID: 28731391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Re: Penile prostheses and the litigious patient: a legal database review.
Morey AF
J Urol; 2015 Apr; 193(4):1323-4. PubMed ID: 25890542
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Re: Penile prostheses and the litigious patient: a legal database review.
Seftel AD
J Urol; 2015 Apr; 193(4):1323. PubMed ID: 25890540
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Influencing factors leading to malpractice litigation in radical prostatectomy.
Colaco M; Sandberg J; Badlani G
J Urol; 2014 Jun; 191(6):1770-5. PubMed ID: 24333245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Epistaxis: the factors involved in determining medicolegal liability.
Khan MN; Blake DM; Vazquez A; Setzen M; Baredes S; Eloy JA
Int Forum Allergy Rhinol; 2014 Jan; 4(1):76-81. PubMed ID: 24124068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Analysis of Factors Associated With Rhytidectomy Malpractice Litigation Cases.
Kandinov A; Mutchnick S; Nangia V; Svider PF; Zuliani GF; Shkoukani MA; Carron MA
JAMA Facial Plast Surg; 2017 Jul; 19(4):255-259. PubMed ID: 28199538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Factors Associated with Trial Outcomes in the Management of Nephrolithiasis: A Legal Database Review.
Vilson F; Colaco M; Gutierrez-Aceves J; Terlecki R
Urol Pract; 2017 Nov; 4(6):473-478. PubMed ID: 37300144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Delayed Diagnosis Is the Primary Cause of Sarcoma Litigation: Analysis of Malpractice Claims in the United States.
Hwang R; Park HY; Sheppard W; Bernthal NM
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2020 Oct; 478(10):2239-2253. PubMed ID: 32496320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Malpractice Litigation in the Setting of Prostate Cancer Diagnosis.
Sunaryo PL; Colaco M; Davis R; Sadeghi-Nejad H
Urol Pract; 2015 Jan; 2(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 37537817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Legal liability in iatrogenic orbital injury.
Svider PF; Kovalerchik O; Mauro AC; Baredes S; Eloy JA
Laryngoscope; 2013 Sep; 123(9):2099-103. PubMed ID: 23404575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Refractive Surgery: Malpractice Litigation Outcomes.
Custer BL; Ballard SR; Carroll RB; Barnes SD; Justin GA
Cornea; 2017 Oct; 36(10):1243-1248. PubMed ID: 28731880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Malpractice litigation after surgical injury of the spinal accessory nerve: an evidence-based analysis.
Morris LG; Ziff DJ; DeLacure MD
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2008 Jan; 134(1):102-7. PubMed ID: 18209145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. From the operating room to the courtroom: a comprehensive characterization of litigation related to facial plastic surgery procedures.
Svider PF; Keeley BR; Zumba O; Mauro AC; Setzen M; Eloy JA
Laryngoscope; 2013 Aug; 123(8):1849-53. PubMed ID: 23299988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A tough pill to swallow: Medicolegal liability and dysphagia.
Badger C; Verma SP
Am J Otolaryngol; 2018; 39(6):698-703. PubMed ID: 30153949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Malodorous consequences: what comprises negligence in anosmia litigation?
Svider PF; Mauro AC; Eloy JA; Setzen M; Carron MA; Folbe AJ
Int Forum Allergy Rhinol; 2014 Mar; 4(3):216-22. PubMed ID: 24395721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
