These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

273 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25071428)

  • 1. The musician effect: does it persist under degraded pitch conditions of cochlear implant simulations?
    Fuller CD; Galvin JJ; Maat B; Free RH; Başkent D
    Front Neurosci; 2014; 8():179. PubMed ID: 25071428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Musician effect on perception of spectro-temporally degraded speech, vocal emotion, and music in young adolescents.
    Başkent D; Fuller CD; Galvin JJ; Schepel L; Gaudrain E; Free RH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 May; 143(5):EL311. PubMed ID: 29857757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Musician effect in cochlear implant simulated gender categorization.
    Fuller CD; Galvin JJ; Free RH; Başkent D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Mar; 135(3):EL159-65. PubMed ID: 24606310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. No Musician Advantage in the Perception of Degraded-Fundamental Frequency Speech in Noisy Environments.
    Hsieh IH; Guo YJ
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2023 Aug; 66(8):2643-2655. PubMed ID: 37499233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of Two Music Training Approaches on Music and Speech Perception in Cochlear Implant Users.
    Fuller CD; Galvin JJ; Maat B; Başkent D; Free RH
    Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518765379. PubMed ID: 29621947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Enduring musician advantage among former musicians in prosodic pitch perception.
    Toh XR; Tan SH; Wong G; Lau F; Wong FCK
    Sci Rep; 2023 Feb; 13(1):2657. PubMed ID: 36788323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Musician enhancement for speech-in-noise.
    Parbery-Clark A; Skoe E; Lam C; Kraus N
    Ear Hear; 2009 Dec; 30(6):653-61. PubMed ID: 19734788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Impact of Auditory-Motor Musical Training on Melodic Pattern Recognition in Cochlear Implant Users.
    Chari DA; Barrett KC; Patel AD; Colgrove TR; Jiradejvong P; Jacobs LY; Limb CJ
    Otol Neurotol; 2020 Apr; 41(4):e422-e431. PubMed ID: 32176126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Music and Speech Perception in Children Using Sung Speech.
    Nie Y; Galvin JJ; Morikawa M; André V; Wheeler H; Fu QJ
    Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518766810. PubMed ID: 29609496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Linguistic, perceptual, and cognitive factors underlying musicians' benefits in noise-degraded speech perception.
    Yoo J; Bidelman GM
    Hear Res; 2019 Jun; 377():189-195. PubMed ID: 30978607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Musician advantage for speech-on-speech perception.
    Başkent D; Gaudrain E
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Mar; 139(3):EL51-6. PubMed ID: 27036287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Music and Speech Perception in Prelingually Deafened Young Listeners With Cochlear Implants: A Preliminary Study Using Sung Speech.
    Wheeler HJ; Hatch DR; Moody-Antonio SA; Nie Y
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2022 Oct; 65(10):3951-3965. PubMed ID: 36179251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of bimodal and bilateral cochlear implant users on speech recognition with competing talker, music perception, affective prosody discrimination, and talker identification.
    Cullington HE; Zeng FG
    Ear Hear; 2011 Feb; 32(1):16-30. PubMed ID: 21178567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Domain-specific hearing-in-noise performance is associated with absolute pitch proficiency.
    Hsieh IH; Tseng HC; Liu JW
    Sci Rep; 2022 Sep; 12(1):16344. PubMed ID: 36175508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Melodic contour identification and music perception by cochlear implant users.
    Galvin JJ; Fu QJ; Shannon RV
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2009 Jul; 1169():518-33. PubMed ID: 19673835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of age on melody and timbre perception in simulations of electro-acoustic and cochlear-implant hearing.
    Arehart KH; Croghan NB; Muralimanohar RK
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(2):195-202. PubMed ID: 24441739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Musician-Advantage on Listening Effort for Speech in Noise Perception: A Dual-Task Paradigm Measure.
    Lavanya V; Rajaram R; Vaidyanath R; Uppunda AK
    J Audiol Otol; 2023 Oct; 27(4):227-234. PubMed ID: 37872757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Relationships between behavior, brainstem and cortical encoding of seen and heard speech in musicians and non-musicians.
    Musacchia G; Strait D; Kraus N
    Hear Res; 2008 Jul; 241(1-2):34-42. PubMed ID: 18562137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Speech intonation and melodic contour recognition in children with cochlear implants and with normal hearing.
    See RL; Driscoll VD; Gfeller K; Kliethermes S; Oleson J
    Otol Neurotol; 2013 Apr; 34(3):490-8. PubMed ID: 23442568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Melodic contour identification by cochlear implant listeners.
    Galvin JJ; Fu QJ; Nogaki G
    Ear Hear; 2007 Jun; 28(3):302-19. PubMed ID: 17485980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.