These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25071648)

  • 1. Been there before? Examining "familiarity" as a moderator for discriminating between true and false intentions.
    Knieps M; Granhag PA; Vrij A
    Front Psychol; 2014; 5():677. PubMed ID: 25071648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Back to the future: asking about mental images to discriminate between true and false intentions.
    Knieps M; Granhag PA; Vrij A
    J Psychol; 2013; 147(6):619-40. PubMed ID: 24199515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Statements about true and false intentions: using the Cognitive Interview to magnify the differences.
    Sooniste T; Granhag PA; Strömwall LA; Vrij A
    Scand J Psychol; 2015 Aug; 56(4):371-8. PubMed ID: 25929812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Detecting false intentions using unanticipated questions.
    Bogaard G; van der Mark J; Meijer EH
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(12):e0226257. PubMed ID: 31825997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Markers of good planning behavior as a cue for separating true and false intent.
    Mac Giolla E; Granhag PA; Liu-Jönsson M
    Psych J; 2013 Dec; 2(3):183-9. PubMed ID: 26271363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A reverse order interview does not aid deception detection regarding intentions.
    Fenn E; McGuire M; Langben S; Blandón-Gitlin I
    Front Psychol; 2015; 6():1298. PubMed ID: 26379610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Amplifying recall after delays via initial interviewing: Inoculating truth-tellers' memory as a function of encoding quality.
    Harvey AC; Vrij A; Leal S; Deeb H; Hope L; Mann S
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2020 Sep; 209():103130. PubMed ID: 32683098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Truth-tellers stand the test of time and contradict evidence less than liars, even months after a crime.
    Sukumar D; Wade KA; Hodgson JS
    Law Hum Behav; 2018 Apr; 42(2):145-155. PubMed ID: 29672094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Do True and False Intentions Differ in Level of Abstraction? A Test of Construal Level Theory in Deception Contexts.
    Calderon S; Mac Giolla E; Granhag PA; Ask K
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():2037. PubMed ID: 29209261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An empirical test of the behaviour analysis interview.
    Vrij A; Mann S; Fisher RP
    Law Hum Behav; 2006 Jun; 30(3):329-45. PubMed ID: 16718581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A stability bias effect among deceivers.
    Harvey AC; Vrij A; Hope L; Leal S; Mann S
    Law Hum Behav; 2017 Dec; 41(6):519-529. PubMed ID: 28726439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. How deception and believability feedback affect recall.
    Vo TVA; Gunderson CA; Ten Brinke L
    Memory; 2022 Jul; 30(6):706-714. PubMed ID: 33557706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Eliciting cues to false intent: a new application of strategic interviewing.
    Clemens F; Granhag PA; Strömwall LA
    Law Hum Behav; 2011 Dec; 35(6):512-22. PubMed ID: 21170575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Partners under Pressure: Examining the Consistency of True and False Alibi Statements.
    Sakrisvold ML; Granhag PA; Mac Giolla E
    Behav Sci Law; 2017 Jan; 35(1):75-90. PubMed ID: 28247431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Some Evidence That Truth-Tellers Are More Attractive Than Liars.
    Ten Brinke L; Raymundo I; Mukherjee M; Carney DR
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2023 Oct; ():1461672231207567. PubMed ID: 37888143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Outsmarting the liars: the benefit of asking unanticipated questions.
    Vrij A; Leal S; Granhag PA; Mann S; Fisher RP; Hillman J; Sperry K
    Law Hum Behav; 2009 Apr; 33(2):159-66. PubMed ID: 18523881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Strategic Interviewing to Detect Deception: Cues to Deception across Repeated Interviews.
    Masip J; Blandón-Gitlin I; Martínez C; Herrero C; Ibabe I
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():1702. PubMed ID: 27847493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The inhibitory spillover effect: Controlling the bladder makes better liars.
    Fenn E; Blandón-Gitlin I; Coons J; Pineda C; Echon R
    Conscious Cogn; 2015 Dec; 37():112-22. PubMed ID: 26366466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessing the efficacy of baselining in deception detection: A comparative analysis of the reality interview and structured interview.
    Bogaard G; van de Bovekamp AM; Colwell K
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2024 Feb; 242():104112. PubMed ID: 38070326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of question expectedness and experience on lying about intentions.
    Warmelink L; Vrij A; Mann S; Jundi S; Granhag PA
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2012 Oct; 141(2):178-83. PubMed ID: 22964059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.