These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25072514)

  • 1. Upon impact: the fate of adhering Pseudomonas fluorescens cells during nanofiltration.
    Habimana O; Semião AJ; Casey E
    Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Aug; 48(16):9641-50. PubMed ID: 25072514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Biofilm recruitment under nanofiltration conditions: the influence of resident biofilm structural parameters on planktonic cell invasion.
    Habimana O; Casey E
    Microb Biotechnol; 2018 Jan; 11(1):264-267. PubMed ID: 29194975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Bacterial adhesion onto nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes: effect of permeate flux.
    Semião AJ; Habimana O; Casey E
    Water Res; 2014 Oct; 63():296-305. PubMed ID: 25016321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A physical impact of organic fouling layers on bacterial adhesion during nanofiltration.
    Heffernan R; Habimana O; Semião AJ; Cao H; Safari A; Casey E
    Water Res; 2014 Dec; 67():118-28. PubMed ID: 25265304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The importance of laboratory water quality for studying initial bacterial adhesion during NF filtration processes.
    Semião AJ; Habimana O; Cao H; Heffernan R; Safari A; Casey E
    Water Res; 2013 May; 47(8):2909-20. PubMed ID: 23541307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. In-situ biofilm characterization in membrane systems using Optical Coherence Tomography: formation, structure, detachment and impact of flux change.
    Dreszer C; Wexler AD; Drusová S; Overdijk T; Zwijnenburg A; Flemming HC; Kruithof JC; Vrouwenvelder JS
    Water Res; 2014 Dec; 67():243-54. PubMed ID: 25282092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Impact of organic nutrient load on biomass accumulation, feed channel pressure drop increase and permeate flux decline in membrane systems.
    Bucs SS; Valladares Linares R; van Loosdrecht MC; Kruithof JC; Vrouwenvelder JS
    Water Res; 2014 Dec; 67():227-42. PubMed ID: 25282091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Antibiofilm activity of Bacillus pumilus SW9 against initial biofouling on microfiltration membranes.
    Zhang Y; Yu X; Gong S; Ye C; Fan Z; Lin H
    Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2014 Feb; 98(3):1309-20. PubMed ID: 23715854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Feasibility of supercritical CO₂ treatment for controlling biofouling in the reverse osmosis process.
    Mun S; Baek Y; Kim C; Lee YW; Yoon J
    Biofouling; 2012; 28(6):627-33. PubMed ID: 22726211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Characterization and effect of biofouling on polyamide reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membrane surfaces.
    Khan MM; Stewart PS; Moll DJ; Mickols WE; Nelson SE; Camper AK
    Biofouling; 2011 Feb; 27(2):173-83. PubMed ID: 21253926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bacterial community composition and structure of biofilms developing on nanofiltration membranes applied to wastewater treatment.
    Ivnitsky H; Katz I; Minz D; Volvovic G; Shimoni E; Kesselman E; Semiat R; Dosoretz CG
    Water Res; 2007 Sep; 41(17):3924-35. PubMed ID: 17585989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. On-line biofilm strength detection in cross-flow membrane filtration systems.
    Suwarno SR; Huang W; Chew YMJ; Tan SHH; Trisno AE; Zhou Y
    Biofouling; 2018 Feb; 34(2):123-131. PubMed ID: 29268634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dynamics of silver elution from functionalised antimicrobial nanofiltration membranes.
    Choudhari S; Habimana O; Hannon J; Allen A; Cummins E; Casey E
    Biofouling; 2017 Jul; 33(6):520-529. PubMed ID: 28604168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Optimization of gravity-driven membrane (GDM) filtration process for seawater pretreatment.
    Wu B; Hochstrasser F; Akhondi E; Ambauen N; Tschirren L; Burkhardt M; Fane AG; Pronk W
    Water Res; 2016 Apr; 93():133-140. PubMed ID: 26900974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of membrane surface properties on the behavior of initial bacterial adhesion and biofilm development onto nanofiltration membranes.
    Myint AA; Lee W; Mun S; Ahn CH; Lee S; Yoon J
    Biofouling; 2010; 26(3):313-21. PubMed ID: 20087803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Gravity-driven membrane filtration as pretreatment for seawater reverse osmosis: linking biofouling layer morphology with flux stabilization.
    Akhondi E; Wu B; Sun S; Marxer B; Lim W; Gu J; Liu L; Burkhardt M; McDougald D; Pronk W; Fane AG
    Water Res; 2015 Mar; 70():158-73. PubMed ID: 25528546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fouling characteristics of NF and RO operated for removal of dissolved matter from groundwater.
    Gwon EM; Yu MJ; Oh HK; Ylee YH
    Water Res; 2003 Jul; 37(12):2989-97. PubMed ID: 12767302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Nanofiltration for the removal of algal metabolites and the effects of fouling.
    Dixon MB; Falconet C; Ho L; Chow CW; O'Neill BK; Newcombe G
    Water Sci Technol; 2010; 61(5):1189-99. PubMed ID: 20220241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of membrane property and feed water organic matter quality on long-term performance of the gravity-driven membrane filtration process.
    Lee D; Lee Y; Choi SS; Lee SH; Kim KW; Lee Y
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2019 Jan; 26(2):1152-1162. PubMed ID: 28721617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Influence of biofouling on pharmaceuticals rejection in NF membrane filtration.
    Botton S; Verliefde AR; Quach NT; Cornelissen ER
    Water Res; 2012 Nov; 46(18):5848-60. PubMed ID: 22960036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.