123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2507257)
1. [Evaluation of the Friedmann visual field analyser in detecting glaucoma damage].
Xu LA
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 1989 Mar; 25(2):80-3. PubMed ID: 2507257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Poly-static quantitative perimetry for detection of open angle glaucoma].
Lai Z; Lao Y; Ai F
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2000 Mar; 36(2):129-30. PubMed ID: 11853601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Visual field assessment in glaucoma: comparative evaluation of manual kinetic Goldmann perimetry and automated static perimetry.
Agarwal HC; Gulati V; Sihota R
Indian J Ophthalmol; 2000 Dec; 48(4):301-6. PubMed ID: 11340889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [A study of high-pass resolution perimetry in the early diagnosis of primary open-angle glaucoma].
Yu M; Zhou W; Ye T
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 1996 Jul; 32(4):267-71. PubMed ID: 9590842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Evaluation of static quantitative automated perimetry in the early diagnosis of primary open-angle glaucoma].
Shen ZM
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 1989 Mar; 25(2):75-9. PubMed ID: 2507256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Quantitative perimetry for early diagnosis of open-angle glaucoma].
Wu L
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 1993 Sep; 29(5):259-62. PubMed ID: 8168386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Testing for glaucoma with frequency-doubling perimetry in normals, ocular hypertensives, and glaucoma patients.
Horn FK; Wakili N; Jünemann AM; Korth M
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2002 Aug; 240(8):658-65. PubMed ID: 12192460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Measurement of Friedmann Visual Field Analyzer tests in primary open-angle glaucoma.
Cox MJ; Wood IC
Optom Vis Sci; 1993 May; 70(5):421-32. PubMed ID: 8515973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Subjective detection of visual field defects using home TV set.
Shirato S; Adachi M; Hara T
Jpn J Ophthalmol; 1991; 35(3):273-81. PubMed ID: 1770667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Can frequency-doubling technology and short-wavelength automated perimetries detect visual field defects before standard automated perimetry in patients with preperimetric glaucoma?
Ferreras A; Polo V; Larrosa JM; Pablo LE; Pajarin AB; Pueyo V; Honrubia FM
J Glaucoma; 2007; 16(4):372-83. PubMed ID: 17571000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Frequency doubling technology perimetry in open-angle glaucoma eyes with hemifield visual field damage: comparison of high-tension and normal-tension groups.
Murata H; Tomidokoro A; Matsuo H; Tomita G; Araie M
J Glaucoma; 2007 Jan; 16(1):9-13. PubMed ID: 17224743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Automated flicker perimetry in glaucoma using Octopus 311: a comparative study with the Humphrey Matrix.
Matsumoto C; Takada S; Okuyama S; Arimura E; Hashimoto S; Shimomura Y
Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2006 Apr; 84(2):210-5. PubMed ID: 16637839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Frequency-doubling perimetry: comparison with standard automated perimetry to detect glaucoma.
Leeprechanon N; Giangiacomo A; Fontana H; Hoffman D; Caprioli J
Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 Feb; 143(2):263-271. PubMed ID: 17178091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Static vs dynamic visual field evaluation; with emphasis on the utility of the Friedmann Visual Field Analyzer.
Yellen M; Sherman J
J Am Optom Assoc; 1979 Jan; 50(1):95-9. PubMed ID: 762380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Correlations between morphologic measurements of the optic disc using planimetric tests and changes in the visual field in patients with glaucoma].
Szelepin L; Cwirko M; Nizankowska MH; Koziorowska M
Klin Oczna; 1997; 99(2):115-9. PubMed ID: 9379662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [A comparative analysis of standard automated perimetry and short wavelength automated perimetry in early diagnosis of glaucoma].
Chiseliţă D; Crenguţa MI; Danielescu C; Mihaela NM
Oftalmologia; 2006; 50(2):94-102. PubMed ID: 16927766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Blue-on-yellow visual field and retinal nerve fiber layer in ocular hypertension and glaucoma.
Teesalu P; Airaksinen PJ; Tuulonen A
Ophthalmology; 1998 Nov; 105(11):2077-81. PubMed ID: 9818609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Short-wavelength automated perimetry (SWAP) in subjects with suspected glaucoma (I): assessment of sensitivity thresholds].
Polo Llorens V; Pinilla Lozano I; Pablo Júlvez LE; Larrosa Poves JM; Abecia Martínez E; Cuevas Andrés R; Rojo Aragües A; Honrubia López FM
Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol; 2000 Feb; 75(2):91-6. PubMed ID: 11151126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Detectability of glaucomatous changes using SAP, FDT, flicker perimetry, and OCT.
Nomoto H; Matsumoto C; Takada S; Hashimoto S; Arimura E; Okuyama S; Shimomura Y
J Glaucoma; 2009 Feb; 18(2):165-71. PubMed ID: 19225357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Correlation between intraocular pressure level and optic disc changes in high-tension glaucoma suspects.
Tanito M; Itai N; Dong J; Ohira A; Chihara E
Ophthalmology; 2003 May; 110(5):915-21. PubMed ID: 12750089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
