These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25072829)

  • 21. Microstrains around standard and mini implants supporting different bridge designs.
    Sallam H; Kheiralla LS; Aldawakly A
    J Oral Implantol; 2012 Jun; 38(3):221-9. PubMed ID: 20712439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Photoelastic stress analysis in mandibular bone surrounding bar-clip overdenture implants.
    Pigozzo MN; Laganá DC; Sesma N; Souza GF; Ichi AL
    Braz Oral Res; 2014; 28():. PubMed ID: 24878673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Static and Dynamic Stress Analysis of Standard- and Narrow-Diameter Implants: A 3D Finite Element Analysis.
    Sahin SC
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2020; 35(4):e58-e68. PubMed ID: 32724919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Finite element stress analysis of dental prostheses supported by straight and angled implants.
    Cruz M; Wassall T; Toledo EM; da Silva Barra LP; Cruz S
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(3):391-403. PubMed ID: 19587860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Stress distribution around maxillary implants in anatomic photoelastic models of varying geometry. Part II.
    Gross MD; Nissan J
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 May; 85(5):450-4. PubMed ID: 11357070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Platform switching: biomechanical evaluation using three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Tabata LF; Rocha EP; Barão VA; Assunção WG
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(3):482-91. PubMed ID: 21691594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Combined influence of implant diameter and alveolar ridge width on crestal bone stress: a quantitative approach.
    Yu W; Jang YJ; Kyung HM
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(1):88-95. PubMed ID: 19344030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Photoelastic stress analysis of different designs of cement-retained fixed partial dentures on Morse taper oral implants.
    Menani LR; Tiossi R; de Torres ÉM; Ribeiro RF; de Almeida RP
    J Craniofac Surg; 2011 Mar; 22(2):674-8. PubMed ID: 21415635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effects of splinted prosthesis supported a wide implant or two implants: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Huang HL; Huang JS; Ko CC; Hsu JT; Chang CH; Chen MY
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2005 Aug; 16(4):466-72. PubMed ID: 16117772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The influence of implant diameter and length on stress distribution of osseointegrated implants related to crestal bone geometry: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Baggi L; Cappelloni I; Di Girolamo M; Maceri F; Vairo G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Dec; 100(6):422-31. PubMed ID: 19033026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Strain gauge analysis of occlusal forces on implant prostheses at various occlusal heights.
    Cho YE; Park EJ; Koak JY; Kim SK; Heo SJ; Park JM
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29(5):1034-41. PubMed ID: 25216126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effect of implant diameter on reliability and failure modes of molar crowns.
    Freitas-Junior AC; Bonfante EA; Martins LM; Silva NR; Marotta L; Coelho PG
    Int J Prosthodont; 2011; 24(6):557-61. PubMed ID: 22146255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Implant-bone interface stress distribution in immediately loaded implants of different diameters: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Ding X; Zhu XH; Liao SH; Zhang XH; Chen H
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Jul; 18(5):393-402. PubMed ID: 19374710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effect of compromised cortical bone on implant load distribution.
    Akça K; Fanuscu MI; Caputo AA
    J Prosthodont; 2008 Dec; 17(8):616-20. PubMed ID: 18798784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A retrospective analysis of 125 single molar crowns supported by two implants: long-term follow-up from 3 to 12 years.
    Wolfinger GJ; Balshi TJ; Wulc DA; Balshi SF
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(1):148-53. PubMed ID: 21365050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Marginal fit and photoelastic stress analysis of CAD-CAM and overcast 3-unit implant-supported frameworks.
    Presotto AG; Bhering CL; Mesquita MF; Barão VA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Mar; 117(3):373-379. PubMed ID: 27666497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Influences of Implant and Framework Materials on Stress Distribution: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis Study.
    Bahadirli G; Yilmaz S; Jones T; Sen D
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(5):e117-e126. PubMed ID: 30231094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A finite element analysis of two different dental implants: stress distribution in the prosthesis, abutment, implant, and supporting bone.
    Quaresma SE; Cury PR; Sendyk WR; Sendyk C
    J Oral Implantol; 2008; 34(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 18390236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Load Transfer Characteristics of Three-Implant-Retained Overdentures with Different Interimplant Distances.
    Tokar E; Uludag B; Karacaer O
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2017; 32(2):363-371. PubMed ID: 28291854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Stress patterns around distal angled implants in the all-on-four concept configuration.
    Begg T; Geerts GA; Gryzagoridis J
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(4):663-71. PubMed ID: 19885406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.