129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25073225)
1. Evaluation of a novel compule-based gingival retraction system in UK general dental practices.
Burke FJ; Crisp RJ
Dent Update; 2014 Jun; 41(5):432-4, 437-8. PubMed ID: 25073225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical efficacy of polyvinyl siloxane impression materials using the one-step two-viscosity impression technique.
Dogan S; Schwedhelm ER; Heindl H; Mancl L; Raigrodski AJ
J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Aug; 114(2):217-22. PubMed ID: 25976708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Practice-based PREP Panel handling evaluation of a new impression mixing device and the associated material.
Burke FJ; Crisp RJ; Klettke T
Int Dent J; 2011 Dec; 61(6):321-7. PubMed ID: 22117789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of efficacy of different gingival displacement materials on gingival sulcus width.
Prasanna GS; Reddy K; Kumar RK; Shivaprakash S
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 Mar; 14(2):217-21. PubMed ID: 23811648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Local and systemic effects of mechanico-chemical retraction.
Donaldson M; Goodchild JH
Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2013 Sep; 34 Spec No 6():1-7; quiz p8. PubMed ID: 24350912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A clinical comparison of cordless and conventional displacement systems regarding clinical performance and impression quality.
Acar Ö; Erkut S; Özçelik TB; Ozdemır E; Akçil M
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 May; 111(5):388-94. PubMed ID: 24360008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Gingival displacement techniques in daily practice. Survey among dental surgeons in Abidjan, Ivory Coast].
Pesson DM; Bakou OD; Didia EL; Kouame A; Blohoua MR; Djeredou KB
Odontostomatol Trop; 2015 Dec; 38(152):25-32. PubMed ID: 26939218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A practice-based evaluation of the handling of a new self-adhesive universal resin luting material.
Burke FJ; Crisp RJ; Richter B
Int Dent J; 2006 Jun; 56(3):142-6. PubMed ID: 16826880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The use of retraction paste to simplify impression and cementation of ceramic veneers and crowns: 3-year follow-up report.
Andreiuolo RF; Abreu JLB; Hirata R
Quintessence Int; 2019; 50(8):604-610. PubMed ID: 31286117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of a cordless retraction paste on titanium surface: a topographic, chemical and biocompatibility evaluation.
Cooper K; Bennani V; Tawse-Smith A; Reid M; Stirling C; Dias G
Braz Oral Res; 2013; 27(3):211-7. PubMed ID: 23739788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. New Zealand dentists' use of gingival retraction techniques for fixed prosthodontics and implants.
Al-Ani A; Bennani V; Chandler NP; Lyons KM; Thomson WM
N Z Dent J; 2010 Sep; 106(3):92-6. PubMed ID: 20882737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Nonsurgical gingival displacement in restorative dentistry.
Thomas MS; Joseph RM; Parolia A
Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2011 Jun; 32(5):26-34; quiz 36, 38. PubMed ID: 21755893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Gingival retraction.
Carville R
J Ir Dent Assoc; 2015 Dec; 61(6):298-300. PubMed ID: 26902073
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of Effectiveness of Three New Gingival Retraction Systems: A Comparative Study.
Kumari S; Singh P; Parmar UG; Patel AM
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2021 Aug; 22(8):922-927. PubMed ID: 34753845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dentists' knowledge and preference regarding gingival displacement methods.
Alraheam IA; Hattar S; Al-Asmar A; Alhadidi A; Hamour SA; Aldroubi A; Sawair FA
BMC Oral Health; 2023 Aug; 23(1):574. PubMed ID: 37587482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A predictable gingival retraction system.
Pescatore C
Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2002 Jan; 23(1 Suppl):7-12; quiz 18. PubMed ID: 11913273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of a cordless retraction paste material on implant surfaces: an in vitro study.
Chang YS; Bennani V; Tawse-Smith A; Girvan L
Braz Oral Res; 2011; 25(6):492-9. PubMed ID: 22147228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of pressure generated by cordless gingival displacement materials.
Bennani V; Inger M; Aarts JM
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Aug; 112(2):163-7. PubMed ID: 24529659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A randomized controlled clinical trial comparing the use of displacement cords and aluminum chloride paste.
Bennani V; Aarts JM; Brunton P
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2020 Jun; 32(4):410-415. PubMed ID: 32442353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A practice-based assessment of the handling of a fast-setting polyvinyl siloxane impression material used with the dual-arch tray technique.
Burke FJ; Crisp RJ
Quintessence Int; 2001; 32(10):805-10. PubMed ID: 11820050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
