These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
374 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25073755)
1. A comparative study of different radiographic methods for detecting occlusal caries lesions. Tarım Ertas E; Küçükyılmaz E; Ertaş H; Savaş S; Yırcalı Atıcı M Caries Res; 2014; 48(6):566-74. PubMed ID: 25073755 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Accuracy of caries detection with four storage phosphor systems and E-speed radiographs. Hintze H; Wenzel A; Frydenberg M Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2002 May; 31(3):170-5. PubMed ID: 12058264 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Diagnostic accuracy of two software modalities for detection of caries lesions in digital radiographs from four dental systems. Hintze H Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2006 Mar; 35(2):78-82. PubMed ID: 16549433 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Diagnostic accuracy of cone beam computed tomography compared with intraoral radiography for the detection of noncavitated occlusal carious lesions. Krzyżostaniak J; Surdacka A; Kulczyk T; Dyszkiewicz-Konwińska M; Owecka M Caries Res; 2014; 48(5):461-6. PubMed ID: 24852420 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. In vitro comparison of D- and E-speed film radiography, RVG, and visualix digital radiography for the detection of enamel approximal and dentinal occlusal caries lesions. Hintze H; Wenzel A; Jones C Caries Res; 1994; 28(5):363-7. PubMed ID: 8001059 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Detection accuracy of proximal caries by phosphor plate and cone-beam computerized tomography images scanned with different resolutions. Cheng JG; Zhang ZL; Wang XY; Zhang ZY; Ma XC; Li G Clin Oral Investig; 2012 Aug; 16(4):1015-21. PubMed ID: 21805053 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Intraoral versus extraoral bitewing radiography in detection of enamel proximal caries: an ex vivo study. Abu El-Ela WH; Farid MM; Mostafa MS Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2016; 45(4):20150326. PubMed ID: 26892946 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Occlusal caries detection by using a cone-beam CT with different voxel resolutions and a digital intraoral sensor. Kamburoğlu K; Murat S; Yüksel SP; Cebeci AR; Paksoy CS Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 May; 109(5):e63-9. PubMed ID: 20416522 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Accuracy of direct digital radiography for detecting occlusal caries in primary teeth compared with conventional radiography and visual inspection: an in vitro study. Dias da Silva PR; Martins Marques M; Steagall W; Medeiros Mendes F; Lascala CA Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2010 Sep; 39(6):362-7. PubMed ID: 20729186 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Ex vivo evaluation of new 2D and 3D dental radiographic technology for detecting caries. Gaalaas L; Tyndall D; Mol A; Everett ET; Bangdiwala A Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2016; 45(3):20150281. PubMed ID: 26670605 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of diagnostic performance on approximal caries detection among Swedish and Chinese senior dental students using analogue and digital radiographs. Minston W; Li G; Wennberg R; Näsström K; Shi XQ Swed Dent J; 2013; 37(2):79-85. PubMed ID: 23957142 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Approximal caries depth assessment with storage phosphor versus film radiography. Evaluation of the caries-specific Oslo enhancement procedure. Svanaes DB; Moystad A; Larheim TA Caries Res; 2000; 34(6):448-53. PubMed ID: 11093017 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. In vitro comparison of four different dental X-ray films and direct digital radiography for proximal caries detection. Alkurt MT; Peker I; Bala O; Altunkaynak B Oper Dent; 2007; 32(5):504-9. PubMed ID: 17910228 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An in-vitro evaluation of Kodak Insight and Ektaspeed Plus film with a CMOS detector for natural proximal caries: ROC analysis. Nair MK; Nair UP Caries Res; 2001; 35(5):354-9. PubMed ID: 11641571 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Histologic and radiographic assessment of caries-like lesions localized at the crown margin. Zoellner A; Diemer B; Weber HP; Stassinakis A; Gaengler P J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Jul; 88(1):54-9. PubMed ID: 12239481 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Influence of the validation method on diagnostic accuracy for caries. A comparison of six digital and two conventional radiographic systems. Hintze H; Wenzel A Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2002 Jan; 31(1):44-9. PubMed ID: 11803388 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Detection accuracy of in vitro approximal caries by cone beam computed tomography images. Qu X; Li G; Zhang Z; Ma X Eur J Radiol; 2011 Aug; 79(2):e24-7. PubMed ID: 20185260 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. In vitro evaluation of ICDAS and radiographic examination of occlusal surfaces and their association with treatment decisions. Diniz MB; Lima LM; Eckert G; Zandona AG; Cordeiro RC; Pinto LS Oper Dent; 2011; 36(2):133-42. PubMed ID: 21777096 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Diagnostic accuracy of cone beam computed tomography scans compared with intraoral image modalities for detection of caries lesions. Haiter-Neto F; Wenzel A; Gotfredsen E Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2008 Jan; 37(1):18-22. PubMed ID: 18195250 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Diagnostic accuracy of different display types in detection of recurrent caries under restorations by using CBCT. Baltacıoĝlu İH; Eren H; Yavuz Y; Kamburoğlu K Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2016; 45(6):20160099. PubMed ID: 27319604 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]