131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25073837)
1. Editorial note: a new section on professional development and greater access to journal content.
Piercy F
J Marital Fam Ther; 2013 Jan; 39(1):1. PubMed ID: 25073837
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Editorial Board Position statement regarding the Declaration on Research Assessment (DORA) recommendations with respect to journal impact factors.
Welk G; Fischman MG; Greenleaf C; Harrison L; Ransdell L; van der Mars H; Zhu W
Res Q Exerc Sport; 2014 Dec; 85(4):429-30. PubMed ID: 25412123
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. A vision for the European journal of clinical investigation: note from the new editors.
Ioannidis JP; Tatsioni A; Karassa FB
Eur J Clin Invest; 2010 Jan; 40(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 20055893
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Replication publication.
Patterson M; Cardon L
PLoS Biol; 2005 Sep; 3(9):e327. PubMed ID: 16149852
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Raising standards.
Nat Genet; 2013 May; 45(5):467. PubMed ID: 23619781
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Toxins: State of the Journal Report, 2017.
Xiao C; Tesh VL
Toxins (Basel); 2017 Feb; 9(2):. PubMed ID: 28165400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. New editors take over.
Westerterp KR; Westerblad H
Eur J Appl Physiol; 2013 Apr; 113(4):823. PubMed ID: 23471684
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. When abstracts conflict with published papers.
DeMaria AN
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2013 Oct; 62(16):1489-90. PubMed ID: 24112818
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Increased transparency: making the journal better for readers and for authors.
Doyle V; Schachat AP
Ophthalmology; 2008 Sep; 115(9):1443-4. PubMed ID: 18762071
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [To improve the quality of the studies is to improve the quality of the journal].
Olmos M; Ortiz Z
Acta Gastroenterol Latinoam; 2006 Sep; 36(3):109-10. PubMed ID: 17407986
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. European urology: quality, impact, online.
Catto JW; Montorsi F; Schulman C
Eur Urol; 2013 Oct; 64(4):523-4. PubMed ID: 23928576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Challenges for a research publication: quantity, quality, and crowd wisdom.
Chandrashekhar Y; Narula J
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2014 Aug; 64(6):622-5. PubMed ID: 25104533
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [Scientific reporting guidelines].
Nylenna M
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2009 Nov; 129(22):2340. PubMed ID: 19935931
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical research design and reporting: always room for improvement!
Heddle NM; Ness P
Transfusion; 2007 Jan; 47(1):2-3. PubMed ID: 17207221
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. How to improve on the analysis and presentation of research data submitted to our Journal.
Salomon LJ; Deter RL; Alfirevic Z
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Nov; 32(6):721-8. PubMed ID: 18925585
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The role of a scientific journal in psychiatric research.
Uwakwe R
Acta Psychiatr Scand; 2015 Dec; 132(6):422. PubMed ID: 26439972
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The new circulation research: a manifesto.
Bolli R
Circ Res; 2010 Feb; 106(2):216-26. PubMed ID: 20133905
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. A new journal for challenges, trends and transformations in academic medicine today.
Jakovljević M; Ostojić L
Psychiatr Danub; 2013 Jun; 25 Suppl 1():2-3. PubMed ID: 23806961
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. How to review a paper for Heart.
Otto CM
Heart; 2015 Jan; 101(1):3-4. PubMed ID: 25502328
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. In pursuit of scientific excellence: sex matters.
Miller VM
Adv Physiol Educ; 2012 Jun; 36(2):83-4. PubMed ID: 22665420
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
