These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25073864)

  • 1. Quantifying the average of the time-varying hazard ratio via a class of transformations.
    Chen Q; Zeng D; Ibrahim JG; Chen MH; Pan Z; Xue X
    Lifetime Data Anal; 2015 Apr; 21(2):259-79. PubMed ID: 25073864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Average Hazard Ratio - A Good Effect Measure for Time-to-event Endpoints when the Proportional Hazard Assumption is Violated?
    Rauch G; Brannath W; Brückner M; Kieser M
    Methods Inf Med; 2018 May; 57(3):89-100. PubMed ID: 29719915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quantifying time-varying cause-specific hazard and subdistribution hazard ratios with competing risks data.
    Diao G; Ibrahim JG
    Clin Trials; 2019 Aug; 16(4):363-374. PubMed ID: 31165631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Hypothesis testing for an extended cox model with time-varying coefficients.
    Saegusa T; Di C; Chen YQ
    Biometrics; 2014 Sep; 70(3):619-28. PubMed ID: 24888739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A new modeling and inference approach for the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial outcomes.
    Yang S; Ambrosius WT; Fine LJ; Bress AP; Cushman WC; Raj DS; Rehman S; Tamariz L
    Clin Trials; 2018 Jun; 15(3):305-312. PubMed ID: 29671345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A win ratio approach for comparing crossing survival curves in clinical trials.
    Zheng S; Wang D; Qiu J; Chen T; Gamalo M
    J Biopharm Stat; 2023 Jul; 33(4):488-501. PubMed ID: 36749067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Introducing a new estimator and test for the weighted all-cause hazard ratio.
    Ozga AK; Rauch G
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Jun; 19(1):118. PubMed ID: 31185922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Data-driven smooth tests of the proportional hazards assumption.
    Kraus D
    Lifetime Data Anal; 2007 Mar; 13(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 17115257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A smooth test in proportional hazard survival models using local partial likelihood fitting.
    Kauermann G; Berger U
    Lifetime Data Anal; 2003 Dec; 9(4):373-93. PubMed ID: 15000411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The type I error and power of non-parametric logrank and Wilcoxon tests with adjustment for covariates--a simulation study.
    Jiang H; Symanowski J; Paul S; Qu Y; Zagar A; Hong S
    Stat Med; 2008 Dec; 27(28):5850-60. PubMed ID: 18759373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Polynomial spline estimation and inference of proportional hazards regression models with flexible relative risk form.
    Huang JZ; Liu L
    Biometrics; 2006 Sep; 62(3):793-802. PubMed ID: 16984322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Hazard ratio inference in stratified clinical trials with time-to-event endpoints and limited sample size.
    Xu R; Mehrotra DV; Shaw PA
    Pharm Stat; 2019 May; 18(3):366-376. PubMed ID: 30706642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An online updating approach for testing the proportional hazards assumption with streams of survival data.
    Xue Y; Wang H; Yan J; Schifano ED
    Biometrics; 2020 Mar; 76(1):171-182. PubMed ID: 31424095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A versatile test for equality of two survival functions based on weighted differences of Kaplan-Meier curves.
    Uno H; Tian L; Claggett B; Wei LJ
    Stat Med; 2015 Dec; 34(28):3680-95. PubMed ID: 26194988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Empirical likelihood for cumulative hazard ratio estimation with covariate adjustment.
    Dong B; Matthews DE
    Biometrics; 2012 Jun; 68(2):408-18. PubMed ID: 22059527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Bias and precision of methods for estimating the difference in restricted mean survival time from an individual patient data meta-analysis.
    Lueza B; Rotolo F; Bonastre J; Pignon JP; Michiels S
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 Mar; 16():37. PubMed ID: 27025706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A goodness-of-fit test for the marginal Cox model for correlated interval-censored failure time data.
    Wang L; Sun L; Sun J
    Biom J; 2006 Dec; 48(6):1020-8. PubMed ID: 17240659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Testing the proportional odds model for interval-censored data.
    Sun J; Sun L; Zhu C
    Lifetime Data Anal; 2007 Mar; 13(1):37-50. PubMed ID: 17160547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Marginal hazards regression for retrospective studies within cohort with possibly correlated failure time data.
    Kang S; Cai J
    Biometrics; 2009 Jun; 65(2):405-14. PubMed ID: 18565164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sequential tests for non-proportional hazards data.
    Brückner M; Brannath W
    Lifetime Data Anal; 2017 Jul; 23(3):339-352. PubMed ID: 26969674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.