These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

215 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25074303)

  • 1. Cognitive diagnostic assessment with different weight for attribute: based on the Dina model.
    Guo L; Bao Y; Wang Z; Bian Y
    Psychol Rep; 2014 Jun; 114(3):802-22. PubMed ID: 25074303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Heuristic cognitive diagnosis when the Q-matrix is unknown.
    Köhn HF; Chiu CY; Brusco MJ
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2015 May; 68(2):268-91. PubMed ID: 25496248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Bayesian item fit analysis for unidimensional item response theory models.
    Sinharay S
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2006 Nov; 59(Pt 2):429-49. PubMed ID: 17067420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Data-driven Q-matrix validation using a residual-based statistic in cognitive diagnostic assessment.
    Yu X; Cheng Y
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2020 Nov; 73 Suppl 1():145-179. PubMed ID: 31762007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cognitive diagnosis modelling incorporating item response times.
    Zhan P; Jiao H; Liao D
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2018 May; 71(2):262-286. PubMed ID: 28872185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Consistency Theory for the General Nonparametric Classification Method.
    Chiu CY; Köhn HF
    Psychometrika; 2019 Sep; 84(3):830-845. PubMed ID: 30725333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A sequential cognitive diagnosis model for polytomous responses.
    Ma W; de la Torre J
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2016 Nov; 69(3):253-275. PubMed ID: 27317397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Application of stochastic modeling to the assessment of group and individual differences in cognitive functioning.
    Neufeld RW; Vollick D; Carter JR; Boksman K; Jetté J
    Psychol Assess; 2002 Sep; 14(3):279-98. PubMed ID: 12214434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Estimation of item parameters and examinees' mastery probability in each domain of the Korean medical licensing examination using deterministic inputs, noisy and gate(DINA) model.
    Choi Y; Seo DG
    J Educ Eval Health Prof; 2020; 17():35. PubMed ID: 33197992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The accuracy and consistency of mastery for each content domain using the Rasch and deterministic inputs, noisy “and” gate diagnostic classification models: a simulation study and a real-world analysis using data from the Korean Medical Licensing Examination.
    Seo DG; Kim JK
    J Educ Eval Health Prof; 2021; 18():15. PubMed ID: 34225413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bayesian Estimation of the DINA Q matrix.
    Chen Y; Culpepper SA; Chen Y; Douglas J
    Psychometrika; 2018 Mar; 83(1):89-108. PubMed ID: 28861685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A general proof of consistency of heuristic classification for cognitive diagnosis models.
    Chiu CY; Köhn HF
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2015 Nov; 68(3):387-409. PubMed ID: 25872467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Diagnostic accuracy of percent retention scores on RBANS verbal memory subtests for the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease and mild cognitive impairment.
    Clark JH; Hobson VL; O'Bryant SE
    Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2010 Jun; 25(4):318-26. PubMed ID: 20378680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Interest of a new instrument to assess cognition in schizophrenia: The Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia (BACS)].
    Bralet MC; Navarre M; Eskenazi AM; Lucas-Ross M; Falissard B
    Encephale; 2008 Dec; 34(6):557-62. PubMed ID: 19081451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Utilizing response times in cognitive diagnostic computerized adaptive testing under the higher-order deterministic input, noisy 'and' gate model.
    Huang HY
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2020 Feb; 73(1):109-141. PubMed ID: 30793768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of the Cognitive Performance Scale (Minimum Data Set) and the Mini-Mental State Exam for the detection of cognitive impairment in nursing home residents.
    Paquay L; De Lepeleire J; Schoenmakers B; Ylieff M; Fontaine O; Buntinx F
    Int J Geriatr Psychiatry; 2007 Apr; 22(4):286-93. PubMed ID: 17022109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Analysis of cognitive performance in schizophrenia patients and healthy individuals with unsupervised clustering models.
    Silver H; Shmoish M
    Psychiatry Res; 2008 May; 159(1-2):167-79. PubMed ID: 18440074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An empirical Q-matrix validation method for the sequential generalized DINA model.
    Ma W; de la Torre J
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2020 Feb; 73(1):142-163. PubMed ID: 30723890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Initial construct validation of frequently employed ANAM measures through structural equation modeling.
    Short P; Cernich A; Wilken JA; Kane RL
    Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2007 Feb; 22 Suppl 1():S63-77. PubMed ID: 17145163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cognitive diagnostic assessment via Bayesian evaluation of informative diagnostic hypotheses.
    Hoijtink H; Béland S; Vermeulen JA
    Psychol Methods; 2014 Mar; 19(1):21-38. PubMed ID: 24127988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.