These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25074310)

  • 21. Memory for emotionally provocative words in alexithymia: a role for stimulus relevance.
    Meltzer MA; Nielson KA
    Conscious Cogn; 2010 Dec; 19(4):1062-8. PubMed ID: 20538490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. ERP indices of emotionality and semantic cohesiveness during recognition judgments.
    McNeely HE; Dywan J; Segalowitz SJ
    Psychophysiology; 2004 Jan; 41(1):117-29. PubMed ID: 14693007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Generalizability of carry-over effects in the emotional Stroop task.
    Waters AJ; Sayette MA; Franken IH; Schwartz JE
    Behav Res Ther; 2005 Jun; 43(6):715-32. PubMed ID: 15890165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Don't be afraid of irrelevant words: the emotional Stroop effect is confined to attended words.
    Frings C; Wühr P
    Cogn Emot; 2012; 26(6):1056-68. PubMed ID: 22404379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Attentional and memory bias in persecutory delusions and depression.
    Taylor JL; John CH
    Psychopathology; 2004; 37(5):233-41. PubMed ID: 15383713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Experimental evidence for interpretive but not attention biases towards somatic information in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome.
    Moss-Morris R; Petrie KJ
    Br J Health Psychol; 2003 May; 8(Pt 2):195-208. PubMed ID: 12804333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Attention interference for emotional stimuli in cardiac interoceptive awareness.
    Werner NS; Mannhart T; Reyes Del Paso GA; Duschek S
    Psychophysiology; 2014 Jun; 51(6):573-8. PubMed ID: 24602065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Negative bias in fast emotion discrimination in borderline personality disorder.
    Dyck M; Habel U; Slodczyk J; Schlummer J; Backes V; Schneider F; Reske M
    Psychol Med; 2009 May; 39(5):855-64. PubMed ID: 18752730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Influence of affective valence on working memory processes.
    Gotoh F
    Int J Psychol; 2008 Feb; 43(1):59-71. PubMed ID: 22023500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A systematic meta-analysis of the Stroop task in depression.
    Epp AM; Dobson KS; Dozois DJ; Frewen PA
    Clin Psychol Rev; 2012 Jun; 32(4):316-28. PubMed ID: 22459792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The automaticity of emotional Stroop: a meta-analysis.
    Phaf RH; Kan KJ
    J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry; 2007 Jun; 38(2):184-99. PubMed ID: 17112461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Left DLPFC rTMS stimulation reduced the anxiety bias effect or how to restore the positive memory processing in high-anxiety subjects.
    Balconi M; Ferrari C
    Psychiatry Res; 2013 Oct; 209(3):554-9. PubMed ID: 23601793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Dissociation between implicit and explicit manifestations of awareness in early stage dementia: evidence from the emotional Stroop effect for dementia-related words.
    Martyr A; Clare L; Nelis SM; Roberts JL; Robinson JU; Roth I; Markova IS; Woods RT; Whitaker CJ; Morris RG
    Int J Geriatr Psychiatry; 2011 Jan; 26(1):92-9. PubMed ID: 21157854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Test-retest reliability of standard and emotional stroop tasks: an investigation of color-word and picture-word versions.
    Strauss GP; Allen DN; Jorgensen ML; Cramer SL
    Assessment; 2005 Sep; 12(3):330-7. PubMed ID: 16123253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Attentional bias for smoking and affective stimuli: a Stroop task study.
    Drobes DJ; Elibero A; Evans DE
    Psychol Addict Behav; 2006 Dec; 20(4):490-5. PubMed ID: 17176185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Expertise and performance on the emotional Stroop task.
    Nortje C; van der Westhuizen LR; Möller AT; Oellermann BY
    Percept Mot Skills; 1999 Jun; 88(3 Pt 2):1361-2. PubMed ID: 10485124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. You can't Stroop a lexical decision: is semantic processing fundamentally facilitative?
    Schmidt JR; Cheesman J; Besner D
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2013 Jun; 67(2):130-9. PubMed ID: 23205510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Modulation of prefrontal cortex activation by emotional words in recognition memory.
    Kuchinke L; Jacobs AM; Võ ML; Conrad M; Grubich C; Herrmann M
    Neuroreport; 2006 Jul; 17(10):1037-41. PubMed ID: 16791099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A rational look at the emotional stroop phenomenon: a generic slowdown, not a stroop effect.
    Algom D; Chajut E; Lev S
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2004 Sep; 133(3):323-38. PubMed ID: 15355142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Spatiotemporal pattern analysis of event-related potentials elicited by emotional Stroop task].
    Liu Q; Liu L; He H; Zhou S
    Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2007 May; 27(5):608-10. PubMed ID: 17545068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.