These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25074783)

  • 1. Do German hospital report cards have the potential to improve the quality of care?
    Emmert M; Hessemer S; Meszmer N; Sander U
    Health Policy; 2014 Dec; 118(3):386-95. PubMed ID: 25074783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Information presentation features and comprehensibility of hospital report cards: design analysis and online survey among users.
    Sander U; Emmert M; Dickel J; Meszmer N; Kolb B
    J Med Internet Res; 2015 Mar; 17(3):e68. PubMed ID: 25782186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Public reporting of hospital quality shows inconsistent ranking results.
    Emmert M; Taheri-Zadeh F; Kolb B; Sander U
    Health Policy; 2017 Jan; 121(1):17-26. PubMed ID: 27890391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Characteristics and decision making of hospital report card consumers: Lessons from an onsite-based cross-sectional study.
    Emmert M; Kast K; Sander U
    Health Policy; 2019 Nov; 123(11):1061-1067. PubMed ID: 31383371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Internet-based Report Cards for Hospital Choice Making in Germany: A Clinical Area-focused Perspective].
    Emmert M; Meszmer N; Simon A; Sander U
    Gesundheitswesen; 2016 Nov; 78(11):721-734. PubMed ID: 26021370
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Patients' Awareness, Usage and Impact of Hospital Report Cards in the US.
    Emmert M; Schlesinger M
    Patient; 2017 Dec; 10(6):729-738. PubMed ID: 28447273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Text Comprehensibility of Hospital Report Cards].
    Sander U; Kolb B; Christoph C; Emmert M
    Gesundheitswesen; 2016 Dec; 78(12):828-834. PubMed ID: 25806505
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effectiveness of public report cards for improving the quality of cardiac care: the EFFECT study: a randomized trial.
    Tu JV; Donovan LR; Lee DS; Wang JT; Austin PC; Alter DA; Ko DT
    JAMA; 2009 Dec; 302(21):2330-7. PubMed ID: 19923205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Better-than-average and worse-than-average hospitals may not significantly differ from average hospitals: an analysis of Medicare Hospital Compare ratings.
    Paddock SM; Adams JL; Hoces de la Guardia F
    BMJ Qual Saf; 2015 Feb; 24(2):128-34. PubMed ID: 25394546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. What factors determine the intention to use hospital report cards? The perspectives of users and non-users.
    Emmert M; Wiener M
    Patient Educ Couns; 2017 Jul; 100(7):1394-1401. PubMed ID: 28189471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Impact of public reporting on the quality of hospital care in Germany: A controlled before-after analysis based on secondary data.
    Kraska RA; Krummenauer F; Geraedts M
    Health Policy; 2016 Jul; 120(7):770-9. PubMed ID: 27220517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Grading the graders: how hospitals in California and New York perceive and interpret their report cards.
    Romano PS; Rainwater JA; Antonius D
    Med Care; 1999 Mar; 37(3):295-305. PubMed ID: 10098573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Influence of cardiac surgeon report cards on patient referral by cardiologists in New York state after 20 years of public reporting.
    Brown DL; Epstein AM; Schneider EC
    Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes; 2013 Nov; 6(6):643-8. PubMed ID: 24221830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Hospital Quality Reporting in the United States: Does Report Card Design and Incorporation of Patient Narrative Comments Affect Hospital Choice?
    Emmert M; Schlesinger M
    Health Serv Res; 2017 Jun; 52(3):933-958. PubMed ID: 27324087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. How well do hospital mortality rates reported in the New York State CABG report card predict subsequent hospital performance?
    Glance LG; Dick AW; Mukamel DB; Li Y; Osler TM
    Med Care; 2010 May; 48(5):466-71. PubMed ID: 20351585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Exploring willingness and related factors by using the healthcare report cards for hospitals in Taiwan.
    Lin HC
    Chang Gung Med J; 2003 May; 26(5):330-8. PubMed ID: 12934849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Public online reporting of urological content for hospital choice making in Germany: a systematic overview].
    Uhlig A; Uhlig J; Gröben C; Huber J; Schmid M
    Aktuelle Urol; 2019 Aug; 50(4):398-406. PubMed ID: 31167241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. What data do California HMOs use to select hospitals for contracting?
    Rainwater JA; Romano PS
    Am J Manag Care; 2003 Aug; 9(8):553-61. PubMed ID: 12921233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Do laymen understand information about hospital quality? An empirical verification using risk-adjusted mortality rates as an example].
    Sander U; Kolb B; Taheri F; Patzelt C; Emmert M
    Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2017 Nov; 127-128():21-29. PubMed ID: 29107649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The impacts of smart cards on hospital information systems--an investigation of the first phase of the national health insurance smart card project in Taiwan.
    Liu CT; Yang PT; Yeh YT; Wang BL
    Int J Med Inform; 2006 Feb; 75(2):173-81. PubMed ID: 16125452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.