BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2507487)

  • 1. Random segregation of DNA strands in epidermal basal cells.
    Kuroki T; Murakami Y
    Jpn J Cancer Res; 1989 Jul; 80(7):637-42. PubMed ID: 2507487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Stem cell identity and template DNA strand segregation.
    Tajbakhsh S
    Curr Opin Cell Biol; 2008 Dec; 20(6):716-22. PubMed ID: 18996191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. High incidence of non-random template strand segregation and asymmetric fate determination in dividing stem cells and their progeny.
    Conboy MJ; Karasov AO; Rando TA
    PLoS Biol; 2007 May; 5(5):e102. PubMed ID: 17439301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cell cycle progression kinetics of regenerating mouse epidermal cells: an in vivo study combining DNA flow cytometry, cell sorting, and [3H]dThd autoradiography.
    Clausen OP; Kirkhus B; Schjølberg AR
    J Invest Dermatol; 1986 Apr; 86(4):402-5. PubMed ID: 3745959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Label-retaining epithelial cells in mouse mammary gland divide asymmetrically and retain their template DNA strands.
    Smith GH
    Development; 2005 Feb; 132(4):681-7. PubMed ID: 15647322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Induction by cholera toxin of synchronous divisions in vivo in the epidermis resulting in hyperplasia.
    Kuroki T
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 1981 Nov; 78(11):6958-62. PubMed ID: 6171825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Appearance of dark keratinocytes following intracutaneous injection of cholera toxin in mouse skin.
    Murakami Y; Hibino T; Arai M; Kuroki T
    J Invest Dermatol; 1985 Aug; 85(2):115-7. PubMed ID: 4020159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cell adhesion geometry regulates non-random DNA segregation and asymmetric cell fates in mouse skeletal muscle stem cells.
    Yennek S; Burute M; Théry M; Tajbakhsh S
    Cell Rep; 2014 May; 7(4):961-70. PubMed ID: 24836002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evolutionary dynamics of adult stem cells: comparison of random and immortal-strand segregation mechanisms.
    Tannenbaum E; Sherley JL; Shakhnovich EI
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2005 Apr; 71(4 Pt 1):041914. PubMed ID: 15903708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Molecular cloaking of H2A.Z on mortal DNA chromosomes during nonrandom segregation.
    Huh YH; Sherley JL
    Stem Cells; 2011 Oct; 29(10):1620-7. PubMed ID: 21905168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evidence that the centrally and peripherally located cells in the murine epidermal proliferative unit are two distinct cell populations.
    Morris RJ; Fischer SM; Slaga TJ
    J Invest Dermatol; 1985 Apr; 84(4):277-81. PubMed ID: 3981041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cell type regulates selective segregation of mouse chromosome 7 DNA strands in mitosis.
    Armakolas A; Klar AJ
    Science; 2006 Feb; 311(5764):1146-9. PubMed ID: 16497932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Immortal DNA or epigenetic signature ?].
    Rocheteau P; Tajbakhsh S
    Med Sci (Paris); 2008 Oct; 24(10):847-52. PubMed ID: 18950581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Support for the immortal strand hypothesis: neural stem cells partition DNA asymmetrically in vitro.
    Karpowicz P; Morshead C; Kam A; Jervis E; Ramunas J; Cheng V; van der Kooy D
    J Cell Biol; 2005 Aug; 170(5):721-32. PubMed ID: 16115957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cosegregation of chromosomes containing immortal DNA strands in cells that cycle with asymmetric stem cell kinetics.
    Merok JR; Lansita JA; Tunstead JR; Sherley JL
    Cancer Res; 2002 Dec; 62(23):6791-5. PubMed ID: 12460886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The (not so) immortal strand hypothesis.
    Tomasetti C; Bozic I
    Stem Cell Res; 2015 Mar; 14(2):238-41. PubMed ID: 25700960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Higher 5-hydroxymethylcytosine identifies immortal DNA strand chromosomes in asymmetrically self-renewing distributed stem cells.
    Huh YH; Cohen J; Sherley JL
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2013 Oct; 110(42):16862-7. PubMed ID: 24082118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The majority of multipotent epidermal stem cells do not protect their genome by asymmetrical chromosome segregation.
    Sotiropoulou PA; Candi A; Blanpain C
    Stem Cells; 2008 Nov; 26(11):2964-73. PubMed ID: 18772311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. DNA asymmetry and cell fate regulation in stem cells.
    Yennek S; Tajbakhsh S
    Semin Cell Dev Biol; 2013; 24(8-9):627-42. PubMed ID: 23680492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Regenerative proliferation of mouse epidermal cells following adhesive tape stripping. Micro-flow fluorometry of isolated epidermal basal cells combined with 3H-TdR incorporation and a stathmokinetic method (colcemid).
    Clausen OP; Lindmo T
    Cell Tissue Kinet; 1976 Nov; 9(6):573-87. PubMed ID: 1000570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.