BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

290 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25077572)

  • 1. Application of genetic algorithms and constructive neural networks for the analysis of microarray cancer data.
    Luque-Baena RM; Urda D; Subirats JL; Franco L; Jerez JM
    Theor Biol Med Model; 2014 May; 11 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S7. PubMed ID: 25077572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Feature weight estimation for gene selection: a local hyperlinear learning approach.
    Cai H; Ruan P; Ng M; Akutsu T
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2014 Mar; 15():70. PubMed ID: 24625071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Top scoring pairs for feature selection in machine learning and applications to cancer outcome prediction.
    Shi P; Ray S; Zhu Q; Kon MA
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2011 Sep; 12():375. PubMed ID: 21939564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Optimizing neural networks for medical data sets: A case study on neonatal apnea prediction.
    Shirwaikar RD; Acharya U D; Makkithaya K; M S; Srivastava S; Lewis U LES
    Artif Intell Med; 2019 Jul; 98():59-76. PubMed ID: 31521253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of machine learning algorithms for chemical toxicity classification using a simulated multi-scale data model.
    Judson R; Elloumi F; Setzer RW; Li Z; Shah I
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2008 May; 9():241. PubMed ID: 18489778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Genetic algorithm based cancerous gene identification from microarray data using ensemble of filter methods.
    Ghosh M; Adhikary S; Ghosh KK; Sardar A; Begum S; Sarkar R
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2019 Jan; 57(1):159-176. PubMed ID: 30069674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of finite sample size on feature selection and classification: a simulation study.
    Way TW; Sahiner B; Hadjiiski LM; Chan HP
    Med Phys; 2010 Feb; 37(2):907-20. PubMed ID: 20229900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparative Study of Classification Algorithms for Various DNA Microarray Data.
    Kim J; Yoon Y; Park HJ; Kim YH
    Genes (Basel); 2022 Mar; 13(3):. PubMed ID: 35328048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Improving prediction accuracy of tumor classification by reusing genes discarded during gene selection.
    Yang JY; Li GZ; Meng HH; Yang MQ; Deng Y
    BMC Genomics; 2008; 9 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S3. PubMed ID: 18366616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Hybrid genetic algorithm-neural network: feature extraction for unpreprocessed microarray data.
    Tong DL; Schierz AC
    Artif Intell Med; 2011 Sep; 53(1):47-56. PubMed ID: 21775110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparative study on feature selection for a risk prediction model for colorectal cancer.
    Cueto-López N; García-Ordás MT; Dávila-Batista V; Moreno V; Aragonés N; Alaiz-Rodríguez R
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2019 Aug; 177():219-229. PubMed ID: 31319951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of machine learning approaches for radioisotope identification using NaI(TI) gamma-ray spectrum.
    Qi S; Zhao W; Chen Y; Chen W; Li J; Zhao H; Xiao W; Ai X; Zhang K; Wang S
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2022 Aug; 186():110212. PubMed ID: 35569263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Computer-assisted lip diagnosis on Traditional Chinese Medicine using multi-class support vector machines.
    Li F; Zhao C; Xia Z; Wang Y; Zhou X; Li GZ
    BMC Complement Altern Med; 2012 Aug; 12():127. PubMed ID: 22898352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A regression-based K nearest neighbor algorithm for gene function prediction from heterogeneous data.
    Yao Z; Ruzzo WL
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2006 Mar; 7 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S11. PubMed ID: 16723004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparative study of different machine learning methods on microarray gene expression data.
    Pirooznia M; Yang JY; Yang MQ; Deng Y
    BMC Genomics; 2008; 9 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S13. PubMed ID: 18366602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mammographic masses characterization based on localized texture and dataset fractal analysis using linear, neural and support vector machine classifiers.
    Mavroforakis ME; Georgiou HV; Dimitropoulos N; Cavouras D; Theodoridis S
    Artif Intell Med; 2006 Jun; 37(2):145-62. PubMed ID: 16716579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Full Intelligent Cancer Classification of Thermal Breast Images to Assist Physician in Clinical Diagnostic Applications.
    Lashkari A; Pak F; Firouzmand M
    J Med Signals Sens; 2016; 6(1):12-24. PubMed ID: 27014608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. NLR, MLP, SVM, and LDA: a comparative analysis on EMG data from people with trans-radial amputation.
    Dellacasa Bellingegni A; Gruppioni E; Colazzo G; Davalli A; Sacchetti R; Guglielmelli E; Zollo L
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2017 Aug; 14(1):82. PubMed ID: 28807038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Filtered selection coupled with support vector machines generate a functionally relevant prediction model for colorectal cancer.
    Gabere MN; Hussein MA; Aziz MA
    Onco Targets Ther; 2016; 9():3313-25. PubMed ID: 27330311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Seminal quality prediction using data mining methods.
    Sahoo AJ; Kumar Y
    Technol Health Care; 2014; 22(4):531-45. PubMed ID: 24898862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.