These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1584 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25079939)

  • 21. Not All Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Biopsies Are Equal: The Impact of the Type of Approach and Operator Expertise on the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.
    Stabile A; Dell'Oglio P; Gandaglia G; Fossati N; Brembilla G; Cristel G; Dehò F; Scattoni V; Maga T; Losa A; Gaboardi F; Cardone G; Esposito A; De Cobelli F; Del Maschio A; Montorsi F; Briganti A
    Eur Urol Oncol; 2018 Jun; 1(2):120-128. PubMed ID: 31100235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging guided diagnostic biopsy detects significant prostate cancer and could reduce unnecessary biopsies and over detection: a prospective study.
    Thompson JE; Moses D; Shnier R; Brenner P; Delprado W; Ponsky L; Pulbrook M; Böhm M; Haynes AM; Hayen A; Stricker PD
    J Urol; 2014 Jul; 192(1):67-74. PubMed ID: 24518762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Optimizing the Number of Cores Targeted During Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging Fusion Target Biopsy.
    Kenigsberg AP; Renson A; Rosenkrantz AB; Huang R; Wysock JS; Taneja SS; Bjurlin MA
    Eur Urol Oncol; 2018 Oct; 1(5):418-425. PubMed ID: 31158081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The Efficacy of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Targeted Biopsy in Risk Classification for Patients with Prostate Cancer on Active Surveillance.
    Recabal P; Assel M; Sjoberg DD; Lee D; Laudone VP; Touijer K; Eastham JA; Vargas HA; Coleman J; Ehdaie B
    J Urol; 2016 Aug; 196(2):374-81. PubMed ID: 26920465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparison of systematic transrectal biopsy to transperineal magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound-fusion biopsy for the diagnosis of prostate cancer.
    Borkowetz A; Platzek I; Toma M; Laniado M; Baretton G; Froehner M; Koch R; Wirth M; Zastrow S
    BJU Int; 2015 Dec; 116(6):873-9. PubMed ID: 25523210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Impact of real-time elastography on magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound fusion guided biopsy in patients with prior negative prostate biopsies.
    Brock M; Löppenberg B; Roghmann F; Pelzer A; Dickmann M; Becker W; Martin-Seidel P; Sommerer F; Schenk L; Palisaar RJ; Noldus J; von Bodman C
    J Urol; 2015 Apr; 193(4):1191-7. PubMed ID: 25451832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Accuracy of MRI-Targeted in-Bore Prostate Biopsy According to the Gleason Score with Postprostatectomy Histopathologic Control--a Targeted Biopsy-Only Strategy with Limited Number of Cores.
    Garmer M; Busch M; Mateiescu S; Fahlbusch DE; Wagener B; Grönemeyer DH
    Acad Radiol; 2015 Nov; 22(11):1409-18. PubMed ID: 26343218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound-fusion biopsy significantly upgrades prostate cancer versus systematic 12-core transrectal ultrasound biopsy.
    Siddiqui MM; Rais-Bahrami S; Truong H; Stamatakis L; Vourganti S; Nix J; Hoang AN; Walton-Diaz A; Shuch B; Weintraub M; Kruecker J; Amalou H; Turkbey B; Merino MJ; Choyke PL; Wood BJ; Pinto PA
    Eur Urol; 2013 Nov; 64(5):713-719. PubMed ID: 23787357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparative Effectiveness of Targeted Prostate Biopsy Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging Ultrasound Fusion Software and Visual Targeting: a Prospective Study.
    Lee DJ; Recabal P; Sjoberg DD; Thong A; Lee JK; Eastham JA; Scardino PT; Vargas HA; Coleman J; Ehdaie B
    J Urol; 2016 Sep; 196(3):697-702. PubMed ID: 27038768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Transperineal Versus Transrectal MRI/TRUS Fusion Targeted Biopsy: Detection Rate of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.
    Pepe P; Garufi A; Priolo G; Pennisi M
    Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2017 Feb; 15(1):e33-e36. PubMed ID: 27530436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The Diagnostic Performance of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Detect Significant Prostate Cancer.
    Thompson JE; van Leeuwen PJ; Moses D; Shnier R; Brenner P; Delprado W; Pulbrook M; Böhm M; Haynes AM; Hayen A; Stricker PD
    J Urol; 2016 May; 195(5):1428-1435. PubMed ID: 26529298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. PI-RADS Version 2 Category on 3 Tesla Multiparametric Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging Predicts Oncologic Outcomes in Gleason 3 + 4 Prostate Cancer on Biopsy.
    Faiena I; Salmasi A; Mendhiratta N; Markovic D; Ahuja P; Hsu W; Elashoff DA; Raman SS; Reiter RE
    J Urol; 2019 Jan; 201(1):91-97. PubMed ID: 30142318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Transperineal magnetic resonance image targeted prostate biopsy versus transperineal template prostate biopsy in the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer.
    Kasivisvanathan V; Dufour R; Moore CM; Ahmed HU; Abd-Alazeez M; Charman SC; Freeman A; Allen C; Kirkham A; van der Meulen J; Emberton M
    J Urol; 2013 Mar; 189(3):860-6. PubMed ID: 23063807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A cohort of transperineal electromagnetically tracked magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasonography fusion-guided biopsy: assessing the impact of inter-reader variability on cancer detection.
    Wajswol E; Winoker JS; Anastos H; Falagario U; Okhawere K; Martini A; Treacy PJ; Voutsinas N; Knauer CJ; Sfakianos JP; Lewis SC; Taouli BA; Rastinehad AR
    BJU Int; 2020 Apr; 125(4):531-540. PubMed ID: 31762182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A Multicentre Analysis of the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Following Transperineal Image-fusion Targeted and Nontargeted Systematic Prostate Biopsy in Men at Risk.
    Miah S; Hosking-Jervis F; Connor MJ; Eldred-Evans D; Shah TT; Arya M; Barber N; Bhardwa J; Bott S; Burke D; Doherty A; Foster C; Freeman A; Hindley R; Jameson C; Karim O; Laniado M; Montgomery B; Nigam R; Punwani S; Sinclair A; Winkler M; Allen C; Ahmed HU
    Eur Urol Oncol; 2020 Jun; 3(3):262-269. PubMed ID: 31411968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Anterior Localization of Prostate Cancer Suspicious Lesions in 1,161 Patients Undergoing Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound Fusion Guided Targeted Biopsies.
    Leyh-Bannurah SR; Kachanov M; Beyersdorff D; Preisser F; Tilki D; Fisch M; Graefen M; Budäus L
    J Urol; 2018 Nov; 200(5):1035-1040. PubMed ID: 29935274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A Prospective Comparison of Selective Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Fusion-Targeted and Systematic Transrectal Ultrasound-Guided Biopsies for Detecting Prostate Cancer in Men Undergoing Repeated Biopsies.
    Boesen L; Nørgaard N; Løgager V; Balslev I; Thomsen HS
    Urol Int; 2017; 99(4):384-391. PubMed ID: 28651247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A prospective, blinded comparison of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging-ultrasound fusion and visual estimation in the performance of MR-targeted prostate biopsy: the PROFUS trial.
    Wysock JS; Rosenkrantz AB; Huang WC; Stifelman MD; Lepor H; Deng FM; Melamed J; Taneja SS
    Eur Urol; 2014 Aug; 66(2):343-51. PubMed ID: 24262102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Assessment of free-hand transperineal targeted prostate biopsy using multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-transrectal ultrasound fusion in Chinese men with prior negative biopsy and elevated prostate-specific antigen.
    Lian H; Zhuang J; Wang W; Zhang B; Shi J; Li D; Fu Y; Jiang X; Zhou W; Guo H
    BMC Urol; 2017 Jul; 17(1):52. PubMed ID: 28679370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Initial experience of magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasonography fusion transperineal biopsy: Biopsy techniques and results for 75 patients.
    Tae JH; Shim JS; Jin HJ; Yoon SG; No TI; Kim JY; Kang SH; Cheon J; Kang SG
    Investig Clin Urol; 2018 Nov; 59(6):363-370. PubMed ID: 30402568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 80.