These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

323 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25079951)

  • 21. Eye gaze versus arrows as spatial cues: two qualitatively different modes of attentional selection.
    Marotta A; Lupiáñez J; Martella D; Casagrande M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Apr; 38(2):326-35. PubMed ID: 21688940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The road to understanding is paved with the speaker's intentions: cues to the speaker's attention and intentions affect pronoun comprehension.
    Nappa R; Arnold JE
    Cogn Psychol; 2014 May; 70():58-81. PubMed ID: 24534295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Gaze and arrow distractors influence saccade trajectories similarly.
    Hermens F; Walker R
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Nov; 63(11):2120-40. PubMed ID: 20486017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Attentional orienting induced by arrows and eye-gaze compared with an endogenous cue.
    Brignani D; Guzzon D; Marzi CA; Miniussi C
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Jan; 47(2):370-81. PubMed ID: 18926835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Eye gaze does not produce reflexive shifts of attention: evidence from frontal-lobe damage.
    Vecera SP; Rizzo M
    Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(1):150-9. PubMed ID: 15922371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Eye gaze cannot be ignored (but neither can arrows).
    Galfano G; Dalmaso M; Marzoli D; Pavan G; Coricelli C; Castelli L
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(10):1895-910. PubMed ID: 22512343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Gaze patterns and audiovisual speech enhancement.
    Yi A; Wong W; Eizenman M
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2013 Apr; 56(2):471-80. PubMed ID: 23275394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Distinct effects of different visual cues on sentence comprehension and later recall: The case of speaker gaze versus depicted actions.
    Kreysa H; Nunnemann EM; Knoeferle P
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Jul; 188():220-229. PubMed ID: 29858107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Visual speech influences speech perception immediately but not automatically.
    Mitterer H; Reinisch E
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Feb; 79(2):660-678. PubMed ID: 27905070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Eye gaze triggers reflexive attention shifts: evidence from lateralised ERPs.
    Feng Q; Zhang X
    Brain Res; 2014 Nov; 1589():37-44. PubMed ID: 25241361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Specificity of Age-Related Differences in Eye-Gaze Following: Evidence From Social and Nonsocial Stimuli.
    Slessor G; Venturini C; Bonny EJ; Insch PM; Rokaszewicz A; Finnerty AN
    J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci; 2016 Jan; 71(1):11-22. PubMed ID: 25150512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A direct link between gaze perception and social attention.
    Bayliss AP; Bartlett J; Naughtin CK; Kritikos A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Jun; 37(3):634-44. PubMed ID: 21038995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Responding to joint attention bids in schizophrenia: An interactive eye-tracking study.
    Caruana N; Seymour K; Brock J; Langdon R
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Aug; 72(8):2068-2083. PubMed ID: 30672375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Investigating hemispheric lateralization of reflexive attention to gaze and arrow cues.
    Marotta A; Lupiáñez J; Casagrande M
    Brain Cogn; 2012 Dec; 80(3):361-6. PubMed ID: 22959915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Native and non-native listeners show similar yet distinct oscillatory dynamics when using gestures to access speech in noise.
    Drijvers L; van der Plas M; Özyürek A; Jensen O
    Neuroimage; 2019 Jul; 194():55-67. PubMed ID: 30905837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Children flexibly seek visual information to support signed and spoken language comprehension.
    MacDonald K; Marchman VA; Fernald A; Frank MC
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2020 Jun; 149(6):1078-1096. PubMed ID: 31750713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Understanding of spoken language under challenging listening conditions in younger and older listeners: a combined behavioral and electrophysiological study.
    Getzmann S; Falkenstein M
    Brain Res; 2011 Sep; 1415():8-22. PubMed ID: 21880303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. I see what you meant to say: Anticipating speech errors during online sentence processing.
    Lowder MW; Ferreira F
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2019 Oct; 148(10):1849-1858. PubMed ID: 30556724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Visual attention during spatial language comprehension.
    Burigo M; Knoeferle P
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(1):e0115758. PubMed ID: 25607540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. What do you know? ERP evidence for immediate use of common ground during online reference resolution.
    Sikos L; Tomlinson SB; Heins C; Grodner DJ
    Cognition; 2019 Jan; 182():275-285. PubMed ID: 30388433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.