These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25080866)

  • 1. Heteroscedastic Latent Trait Models for Dichotomous Data.
    Molenaar D
    Psychometrika; 2015 Sep; 80(3):625-44. PubMed ID: 25080866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Heteroscedastic Graded Response Model with a Skewed Latent Trait: Testing Statistical and Substantive Hypotheses Related to Skewed Item Category Functions.
    Molenaar D; Dolan CV; de Boeck P
    Psychometrika; 2012 Jul; 77(3):455-78. PubMed ID: 27519776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A heteroscedastic hidden Markov mixture model for responses and categorized response times.
    Molenaar D; Rózsa S; Bolsinova M
    Behav Res Methods; 2019 Apr; 51(2):676-696. PubMed ID: 30924104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A heteroscedastic generalized linear model with a non-normal speed factor for responses and response times.
    Molenaar D; Bolsinova M
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2017 May; 70(2):297-316. PubMed ID: 28474768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Capturing abnormal personality with normal personality inventories: an item response theory approach.
    Walton KE; Roberts BW; Krueger RF; Blonigen DM; Hicks BM
    J Pers; 2008 Dec; 76(6):1623-48. PubMed ID: 19012660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Using the dichotomous Rasch model to analyze polytomous items.
    He Q; Wheadon C
    J Appl Meas; 2013; 14(1):44-56. PubMed ID: 23442327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A Multimethod Latent State-Trait Model for Structurally Different And Interchangeable Methods.
    Koch T; Schultze M; Holtmann J; Geiser C; Eid M
    Psychometrika; 2017 Mar; 82(1):17-47. PubMed ID: 27905055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Generalized Network Psychometrics: Combining Network and Latent Variable Models.
    Epskamp S; Rhemtulla M; Borsboom D
    Psychometrika; 2017 Dec; 82(4):904-927. PubMed ID: 28290111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Multilevel IRT using dichotomous and polytomous response data.
    Fox JP
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2005 May; 58(Pt 1):145-72. PubMed ID: 15969844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Unique Variable Analysis: A Network Psychometrics Method to Detect Local Dependence.
    Christensen AP; Garrido LE; Golino H
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2023; 58(6):1165-1182. PubMed ID: 37139938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessing Cognitive Abilities Using the WAIS-IV: An Item Response Theory Approach.
    Abdelhamid GSM; Bassiouni MGA; Gómez-Benito J
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Jun; 18(13):. PubMed ID: 34202249
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparison of latent class, K-means, and K-median methods for clustering dichotomous data.
    Brusco MJ; Shireman E; Steinley D
    Psychol Methods; 2017 Sep; 22(3):563-580. PubMed ID: 27607543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Heteroscedastic one-factor models and marginal maximum likelihood estimation.
    Hessen DJ; Dolan CV
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2009 Feb; 62(Pt 1):57-77. PubMed ID: 17935662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Nonlinear Indicator-Level Moderation in Latent Variable Models.
    Bolsinova M; Molenaar D
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2019; 54(1):62-84. PubMed ID: 30513219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A note on monotonicity of item response functions for ordered polytomous item response theory models.
    Kang HA; Su YH; Chang HH
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2018 Nov; 71(3):523-535. PubMed ID: 29516492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Local polynomial estimation of heteroscedasticity in a multivariate linear regression model and its applications in economics.
    Su L; Zhao Y; Yan T; Li F
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(9):e43719. PubMed ID: 23028468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Latent trait analysis of the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire.
    Grayson DA
    J Psychiatr Res; 1986; 20(3):217-35. PubMed ID: 3772823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Applying Bifactor Statistical Indices in the Evaluation of Psychological Measures.
    Rodriguez A; Reise SP; Haviland MG
    J Pers Assess; 2016; 98(3):223-37. PubMed ID: 26514921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A two-stage estimation of structural equation models with continuous and polytomous variables.
    Lee SY; Poon WY; Bentler PM
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 1995 Nov; 48 ( Pt 2)():339-58. PubMed ID: 8527346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A classification model for continuous responses: Identifying risk perception groups on health-related activities.
    de Oliveira ESB; Wang X; Bazán JL
    Biom J; 2023 Apr; 65(4):e2100222. PubMed ID: 36782079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.