These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
246 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25081010)
1. Shock wave lithotripsy: the new phoenix? Neisius A; Lipkin ME; Rassweiler JJ; Zhong P; Preminger GM; Knoll T World J Urol; 2015 Feb; 33(2):213-21. PubMed ID: 25081010 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [What is the current status of shock wave lithotripsy?]. Neisius A Urologe A; 2017 Sep; 56(9):1147-1157. PubMed ID: 28766005 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Recent advances in lithotripsy technology and treatment strategies: A systematic review update. Elmansy HE; Lingeman JE Int J Surg; 2016 Dec; 36(Pt D):676-680. PubMed ID: 27890653 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A new nomogram for prediction of outcome of pediatric shock-wave lithotripsy. Dogan HS; Altan M; Citamak B; Bozaci AC; Karabulut E; Tekgul S J Pediatr Urol; 2015 Apr; 11(2):84.e1-6. PubMed ID: 25812469 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Current status of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in urinary lithiasis.]. Pereira-Arias JG; Gamarra-Quintanilla M; Urdaneta-Salegui LF; Mora-Christian JA; Sánchez-Vazquez A; Astobieta-Odriozola A; Ibarluzea-González G Arch Esp Urol; 2017 Mar; 70(2):263-287. PubMed ID: 28300033 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison between extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and semirigid ureterorenoscope with holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy for treating large proximal ureteral stones. Wu CF; Shee JJ; Lin WY; Lin CL; Chen CS J Urol; 2004 Nov; 172(5 Pt 1):1899-902. PubMed ID: 15540749 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Impact of Case Volume on Shock Wave Lithotripsy Outcomes: Data from the National Shock Wave Lithotripsy Database of New Zealand. Alexander CE; Gowland S; Cadwallader J; Hopkins D; Reynard JM; Turney BW J Endourol; 2019 Aug; 33(8):655-659. PubMed ID: 30963786 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Changing patient and stone features for shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) in Turkey. Ilker Y; Tarcan T; Simşek F; Akdaş A Int Urol Nephrol; 1995; 27(6):663-8. PubMed ID: 8725029 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Adjuncts to improve outcomes of shock wave lithotripsy. Steinberg PL; Williams S; Hoenig DM Curr Urol Rep; 2010 Mar; 11(2):93-7. PubMed ID: 20425096 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Shock wave lithotripsy: advances in technology and technique. Lingeman JE; McAteer JA; Gnessin E; Evan AP Nat Rev Urol; 2009 Dec; 6(12):660-70. PubMed ID: 19956196 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A new optical coupling control technique and application in SWL. Lv JL Urolithiasis; 2016 Nov; 44(6):539-544. PubMed ID: 27025864 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Is shock wave lithotripsy efficient for the elderly stone formers? Results of a matched-pair analysis. Philippou P; Lamrani D; Moraitis K; Bach C; Masood J; Buchholz N Urol Res; 2012 Aug; 40(4):299-304. PubMed ID: 21901557 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Shock wave lithotripsy versus endoscopic cystolitholapaxy in the management of patients presenting with calcular acute urinary retention: a randomised controlled trial. Ali M; Hashem A; Helmy TE; Zewin T; Sheir KZ; Shokeir AA World J Urol; 2019 May; 37(5):879-884. PubMed ID: 30105456 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluating the importance of mean stone density and skin-to-stone distance in predicting successful shock wave lithotripsy of renal and ureteric calculi. Wiesenthal JD; Ghiculete D; D'A Honey RJ; Pace KT Urol Res; 2010 Aug; 38(4):307-13. PubMed ID: 20625891 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in the pediatric population. Nelson CP Urol Res; 2010 Aug; 38(4):327-31. PubMed ID: 20625893 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]