262 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25081011)
1. Evaluation of the PI-RADS scoring system for mpMRI of the prostate: a whole-mount step-section analysis.
Junker D; Quentin M; Nagele U; Edlinger M; Richenberg J; Schaefer G; Ladurner M; Jaschke W; Horninger W; Aigner F
World J Urol; 2015 Jul; 33(7):1023-30. PubMed ID: 25081011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of PI-RADS v1 and v2 for multiparametric MRI detection of prostate cancer with whole-mount histological workup as reference standard.
Schaudinn A; Gawlitza J; Mucha S; Linder N; Franz T; Horn LC; Kahn T; Busse H
Eur J Radiol; 2019 Jul; 116():180-185. PubMed ID: 31153562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of multiparametric and biparametric MRI of the prostate: are gadolinium-based contrast agents needed for routine examinations?
Junker D; Steinkohl F; Fritz V; Bektic J; Tokas T; Aigner F; Herrmann TRW; Rieger M; Nagele U
World J Urol; 2019 Apr; 37(4):691-699. PubMed ID: 30078170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Performance of PI-RADS version 1 versus version 2 regarding the relation with histopathological results.
Auer T; Edlinger M; Bektic J; Nagele U; Herrmann T; Schäfer G; Aigner F; Junker D
World J Urol; 2017 May; 35(5):687-693. PubMed ID: 27510762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of a multiparametric MRI radiomic-based approach for stratification of equivocal PI-RADS 3 and upgraded PI-RADS 4 prostatic lesions.
Brancato V; Aiello M; Basso L; Monti S; Palumbo L; Di Costanzo G; Salvatore M; Ragozzino A; Cavaliere C
Sci Rep; 2021 Jan; 11(1):643. PubMed ID: 33436929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. MR-sequences for prostate cancer diagnostics: validation based on the PI-RADS scoring system and targeted MR-guided in-bore biopsy.
Schimmöller L; Quentin M; Arsov C; Hiester A; Buchbender C; Rabenalt R; Albers P; Antoch G; Blondin D
Eur Radiol; 2014 Oct; 24(10):2582-9. PubMed ID: 24972954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Investigating the role of DCE-MRI, over T2 and DWI, in accurate PI-RADS v2 assessment of clinically significant peripheral zone prostate lesions as defined at radical prostatectomy.
Taghipour M; Ziaei A; Alessandrino F; Hassanzadeh E; Harisinghani M; Vangel M; Tempany CM; Fennessy FM
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2019 Apr; 44(4):1520-1527. PubMed ID: 30361870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of the prostate imaging reporting and data system for the detection of prostate cancer by the results of targeted biopsy of the prostate.
Baur AD; Maxeiner A; Franiel T; Kilic E; Huppertz A; Schwenke C; Hamm B; Durmus T
Invest Radiol; 2014 Jun; 49(6):411-20. PubMed ID: 24598440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. 1.5-T multiparametric MRI using PI-RADS: a region by region analysis to localize the index-tumor of prostate cancer in patients undergoing prostatectomy.
Reisæter LA; Fütterer JJ; Halvorsen OJ; Nygård Y; Biermann M; Andersen E; Gravdal K; Haukaas S; Monssen JA; Huisman HJ; Akslen LA; Beisland C; Rørvik J
Acta Radiol; 2015 Apr; 56(4):500-11. PubMed ID: 24819231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Interreader agreement of PI-RADS v. 2 in assessing prostate cancer with multiparametric MRI: A study using whole-mount histology as the standard of reference.
Girometti R; Giannarini G; Greco F; Isola M; Cereser L; Como G; Sioletic S; Pizzolitto S; Crestani A; Ficarra V; Zuiani C
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Feb; 49(2):546-555. PubMed ID: 30187600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Fusion of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Real-Time Elastography to Visualize Prostate Cancer: A Prospective Analysis using Whole Mount Sections after Radical Prostatectomy.
Brock M; Roghmann F; Sonntag C; Sommerer F; Tian Z; Löppenberg B; Palisaar RJ; Noldus J; Hanske J; von Bodman C
Ultraschall Med; 2015 Aug; 36(4):355-61. PubMed ID: 24854132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [PI-RADS score of prostate multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging predicts pathological features of prostate cancer: An imaging to whole-mount pathology matching study].
Gao J; Wang BJ; Zhang Q; Zhao XZ; Fu Y; Li DY; Wang W; Guo HQ
Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2022 Mar; 28(3):217-222. PubMed ID: 37462959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of the European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) PI-RADS scoring system for assessment of extra-prostatic extension in prostatic carcinoma.
Schieda N; Quon JS; Lim C; El-Khodary M; Shabana W; Singh V; Morash C; Breau RH; McInnes MD; Flood TA
Eur J Radiol; 2015 Oct; 84(10):1843-8. PubMed ID: 26137904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of PI-RADS 2, ADC histogram-derived parameters, and their combination for the diagnosis of peripheral zone prostate cancer.
Lin WC; Westphalen AC; Silva GE; Chodraui Filho S; Reis RB; Muglia VF
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2016 Nov; 41(11):2209-2217. PubMed ID: 27364781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The combination of prostate imaging reporting and data system version 2 (PI-RADS v2) and periprostatic fat thickness on multi-parametric MRI to predict the presence of prostate cancer.
Cao Y; Cao M; Chen Y; Yu W; Fan Y; Liu Q; Gao G; Zhao Z; Wang X; Jin J
Oncotarget; 2017 Jul; 8(27):44040-44049. PubMed ID: 28476042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of observation size and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value in PI-RADS v2.1 assessment category 4 and 5 observations compared to adverse pathological outcomes.
Abreu-Gomez J; Walker D; Alotaibi T; McInnes MDF; Flood TA; Schieda N
Eur Radiol; 2020 Aug; 30(8):4251-4261. PubMed ID: 32211965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Impact of qualitative, semi-quantitative, and quantitative analyses of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnet resonance imaging on prostate cancer detection.
Ziayee F; Ullrich T; Blondin D; Irmer H; Arsov C; Antoch G; Quentin M; Schimmöller L
PLoS One; 2021; 16(4):e0249532. PubMed ID: 33819295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Updated prostate imaging reporting and data system (PIRADS v2) recommendations for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer using multiparametric MRI: critical evaluation using whole-mount pathology as standard of reference.
Vargas HA; Hötker AM; Goldman DA; Moskowitz CS; Gondo T; Matsumoto K; Ehdaie B; Woo S; Fine SW; Reuter VE; Sala E; Hricak H
Eur Radiol; 2016 Jun; 26(6):1606-12. PubMed ID: 26396111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Classification in the Prediction of Tumor Aggressiveness in Targeted Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound-Fusion Biopsy.
Borkowetz A; Platzek I; Toma M; Renner T; Herout R; Baunacke M; Laniado M; Baretton GB; Froehner M; Zastrow S; Wirth MP
Urol Int; 2017; 99(2):177-185. PubMed ID: 28531902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Value of Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced (DCE) MR Imaging in Peripheral Lesions in PI-RADS-4 Patients.
Ullrich T; Quentin M; Arsov C; Laqua N; Abrar D; Hiester A; Albers P; Antoch G; Schimmöller L
Rofo; 2020 May; 192(5):441-447. PubMed ID: 31622990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
