260 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25081305)
1. Same-Day Versus Next-Day Repair of Fovea-Threatening Primary Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachments.
Gorovoy IR; Porco TC; Bhisitkul RB; de Juan E; Schwartz DM; Stewart JM
Semin Ophthalmol; 2016; 31(3):219-25. PubMed ID: 25081305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Fovea-sparing rhegmatogenous retinal detachments: impact of clinical factors including time to surgery on visual and anatomic outcomes.
Lee IT; Lampen SIR; Wong TP; Major JC; Wykoff CC
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2019 May; 257(5):883-889. PubMed ID: 30635720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Fovea-sparing retinal detachments: time to surgery and visual outcomes.
Wykoff CC; Smiddy WE; Mathen T; Schwartz SG; Flynn HW; Shi W
Am J Ophthalmol; 2010 Aug; 150(2):205-210.e2. PubMed ID: 20541738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of symptom duration on outcomes following vitrectomy repair of primary macula-off retinal detachments.
Kim JD; Pham HH; Lai MM; Josephson JW; Minarcik JR; Von Fricken M
Retina; 2013 Oct; 33(9):1931-7. PubMed ID: 23591530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Outcomes and complications of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment repair with selective sutureless 25-gauge pars plana vitrectomy.
Bourla DH; Bor E; Axer-Siegel R; Mimouni K; Weinberger D
Am J Ophthalmol; 2010 Apr; 149(4):630-634.e1. PubMed ID: 20138604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Two-year follow-up study comparing primary vitrectomy with scleral buckling for macula-off rhegmatogenous retinal detachment.
Oshima Y; Yamanishi S; Sawa M; Motokura M; Harino S; Emi K
Jpn J Ophthalmol; 2000; 44(5):538-49. PubMed ID: 11033134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Primary repair of retinal detachment with 25-gauge pars plana vitrectomy.
Miller DM; Riemann CD; Foster RE; Petersen MR
Retina; 2008; 28(7):931-6. PubMed ID: 18698293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Pars plana vitrectomy versus combined pars plana vitrectomy-scleral buckle for primary repair of pseudophakic retinal detachment.
Weichel ED; Martidis A; Fineman MS; McNamara JA; Park CH; Vander JF; Ho AC; Brown GC
Ophthalmology; 2006 Nov; 113(11):2033-40. PubMed ID: 17074564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of surgical timing in 23-g pars plana vitrectomy for primary repair of macula-off rhegmatogenous retinal detachment, a retrospective study.
Elghawy O; Duong R; Nigussie A; Bogaard JD; Patrie J; Shildkrot Y
BMC Ophthalmol; 2022 Mar; 22(1):136. PubMed ID: 35337296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. LONG-TERM VISUAL OUTCOMES AND THE TIMING OF SURGICAL REPAIR OF FOVEA-SPLITTING RHEGMATOGENOUS RETINAL DETACHMENTS.
Lee R; Shields RA; Maywood MJ; Nemeth C; Wa CA; Williams GA; Hassan TS; Garretson BR; Capone A; Ruby AJ; Drenser KA; Faia LJ; Randhawa S; Mahmoud TH; Wolfe JD
Retina; 2022 Feb; 42(2):244-249. PubMed ID: 34469406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Foveal microstructure and visual acuity after retinal detachment repair: imaging analysis by Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography.
Wakabayashi T; Oshima Y; Fujimoto H; Murakami Y; Sakaguchi H; Kusaka S; Tano Y
Ophthalmology; 2009 Mar; 116(3):519-28. PubMed ID: 19147231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Pars plana vitrectomy compared with pars plana vitrectomy combined with scleral buckle in the primary management of noncomplex rhegmatogenous retinal detachment.
Orlin A; Hewing NJ; Nissen M; Lee S; Kiss S; DʼAmico DJ; Chan RV
Retina; 2014 Jun; 34(6):1069-75. PubMed ID: 24853687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Management of retinal detachment when no break is found.
Salicone A; Smiddy WE; Venkatraman A; Feuer W
Ophthalmology; 2006 Mar; 113(3):398-403. PubMed ID: 16406538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Anatomic and visual outcomes in early versus late macula-on primary retinal detachment repair.
Lai MM; Khan N; Weichel ED; Berinstein DM
Retina; 2011 Jan; 31(1):93-8. PubMed ID: 20703177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. SCLERAL BUCKLING VERSUS VITRECTOMY IN THE MANAGEMENT OF MACULA-OFF PRIMARY RHEGMATOGENOUS RETINAL DETACHMENT: A COMPARISON OF VISUAL OUTCOMES.
Wong CW; Yeo IY; Loh BK; Wong EY; Wong DW; Ong SG; Ang CL; Lee SY
Retina; 2015 Dec; 35(12):2552-7. PubMed ID: 26049617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Visual recovery after scleral buckling surgery in macula-off rhegmatogenous retinal detachment.
Liu F; Meyer CH; Mennel S; Hoerle S; Kroll P
Ophthalmologica; 2006; 220(3):174-80. PubMed ID: 16679792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Predictors for recovery of macular function after surgery for primary macula-off rhegmatogenous retinal detachment.
Geiger M; Smith JM; Lynch A; Patnaik JL; Oliver SCN; Dixon JA; Mandava N; Palestine AG;
Int Ophthalmol; 2020 Mar; 40(3):609-616. PubMed ID: 31768813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Visual outcomes after surgery for primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment in era of microincision vitrectomy: Japan-Retinal Detachment Registry Report IV.
Baba T; Kawasaki R; Yamakiri K; Koto T; Nishitsuka K; Yamamoto S; Sakamoto T;
Br J Ophthalmol; 2021 Feb; 105(2):227-232. PubMed ID: 32245850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Influence of submacular fluid on recovery of retinal function and structure after successful rhegmatogenous retinal reattachment.
Kobayashi M; Iwase T; Yamamoto K; Ra E; Hirata N; Terasaki H
PLoS One; 2019; 14(7):e0218216. PubMed ID: 31269030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Influencing factors of visual prognosis in patients with persistent submacular fluid after successful scleral buckle surgery for macula-off retinal detachment].
Chen YY; Tian B; He L; Li L; Li J; Shi XY; Zhou D
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2023 Nov; 59(11):899-905. PubMed ID: 37936358
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
