These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25081342)

  • 1. Margins: a status report from the Annual Meeting of the American Society of Breast Surgeons.
    Harness JK; Giuliano AE; Pockaj BA; Downs-Kelly E
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2014 Oct; 21(10):3192-7. PubMed ID: 25081342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessment of Practice Patterns Following Publication of the SSO-ASTRO Consensus Guideline on Margins for Breast-Conserving Therapy in Stage I and II Invasive Breast Cancer.
    DeSnyder SM; Hunt KK; Smith BD; Moran MS; Klimberg S; Lucci A
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2015 Oct; 22(10):3250-6. PubMed ID: 26202554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Breast Specimen Processing and Reporting With an Emphasis on Margin Evaluation: A College of American Pathologists Survey of 866 Laboratories.
    Guidi AJ; Tworek JA; Mais DD; Souers RJ; Blond BJ; Brown RW
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2018 Apr; 142(4):496-506. PubMed ID: 29328775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Role for intraoperative margin assessment in patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery.
    Cabioglu N; Hunt KK; Sahin AA; Kuerer HM; Babiera GV; Singletary SE; Whitman GJ; Ross MI; Ames FC; Feig BW; Buchholz TA; Meric-Bernstam F
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Apr; 14(4):1458-71. PubMed ID: 17260108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Margins for breast-conserving surgery with whole-breast irradiation in stage I and II invasive breast cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology endorsement of the Society of Surgical Oncology/American Society for Radiation Oncology consensus guideline.
    Buchholz TA; Somerfield MR; Griggs JJ; El-Eid S; Hammond ME; Lyman GH; Mason G; Newman LA
    J Clin Oncol; 2014 May; 32(14):1502-6. PubMed ID: 24711553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accuracy of intraoperative gross examination of surgical margin status in women undergoing partial mastectomy for breast malignancy.
    Balch GC; Mithani SK; Simpson JF; Kelley MC
    Am Surg; 2005 Jan; 71(1):22-7; discussion 27-8. PubMed ID: 15757052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Close/positive margins after breast-conserving therapy: additional resection or no resection?
    Wood WC
    Breast; 2013 Aug; 22 Suppl 2():S115-7. PubMed ID: 24074771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Toolbox to Reduce Lumpectomy Reoperations and Improve Cosmetic Outcome in Breast Cancer Patients: The American Society of Breast Surgeons Consensus Conference.
    Landercasper J; Attai D; Atisha D; Beitsch P; Bosserman L; Boughey J; Carter J; Edge S; Feldman S; Froman J; Greenberg C; Kaufman C; Morrow M; Pockaj B; Silverstein M; Solin L; Staley A; Vicini F; Wilke L; Yang W; Cody H
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2015 Oct; 22(10):3174-83. PubMed ID: 26215198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Attaining negative margins in breast-conservation operations: is there a consensus among breast surgeons?
    Blair SL; Thompson K; Rococco J; Malcarne V; Beitsch PD; Ollila DW
    J Am Coll Surg; 2009 Nov; 209(5):608-13. PubMed ID: 19854401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reexcision Surgery for Breast Cancer: An Analysis of the American Society of Breast Surgeons (ASBrS) Mastery
    Schulman AM; Mirrielees JA; Leverson G; Landercasper J; Greenberg C; Wilke LG
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2017 Jan; 24(1):52-58. PubMed ID: 27581607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Intra-operative touch preparation cytology; does it have a role in re-excision lumpectomy?
    Valdes EK; Boolbol SK; Cohen JM; Feldman SM
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Mar; 14(3):1045-50. PubMed ID: 17206481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Perioperative measures to optimize margin clearance in breast conserving surgery.
    Angarita FA; Nadler A; Zerhouni S; Escallon J
    Surg Oncol; 2014 Jun; 23(2):81-91. PubMed ID: 24721660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Intraoperative Margin Management in Breast-Conserving Surgery: A Systematic Review of the Literature.
    Gray RJ; Pockaj BA; Garvey E; Blair S
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2018 Jan; 25(1):18-27. PubMed ID: 28058560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Society of Surgical Oncology-American Society for Radiation Oncology Consensus Guideline on Margins for Breast-Conserving Surgery With Whole-Breast Irradiation in Stages I and II Invasive Breast Cancer: Perspectives for Pathologists.
    Schnitt SJ; Moran MS; Houssami N; Morrow M
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2015 May; 139(5):575-7. PubMed ID: 25153620
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Factors that influence the incidence of microscopic carcinoma in frozen and preserved specimens from patients with breast carcinoma after breast-conserving surgery.
    Kim R; Osaki A; Kaneko M; Inai K; Toge T
    Oncol Rep; 2003; 10(5):1321-8. PubMed ID: 12883701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Understanding the mechanisms creating false positive lumpectomy margins.
    Dooley WC; Parker J
    Am J Surg; 2005 Oct; 190(4):606-8. PubMed ID: 16164932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Surgical margins in breast conservation.
    Chiappa C; Rovera F; Corben AD; Fachinetti A; De Berardinis V; Marchionini V; Rausei S; Boni L; Dionigi G; Dionigi R
    Int J Surg; 2013; 11 Suppl 1():S69-72. PubMed ID: 24380558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Revisiting surgical margins for invasive breast cancer patients treated with breast conservation therapy - Evidence for adopting a 1 mm negative width.
    Rakha EA; Quinn C; Masannat YA; Lee AHS; Tan PH; Karakatsanis A; Matrai ZT; Al Shaibani SHM; Gehani SA; Shaaban A; Khout H; Chagla L; Cserni G; Varga Z; Yong WF; Meattini I; Kulka J; Yang W; Tse GM; Pinder SE; Fox S; Dixon JM
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2024 Oct; 50(10):108573. PubMed ID: 39243583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Use of an intraoperative ultrasonography-guided localization and tissue fixation device demonstrates less margin positivity during breast-conserving surgery for invasive breast cancer than standard preoperative needle-wire localization: a retrospective comparative analysis in a consecutively treated case series.
    Povoski SP; Jimenez RE; Wang WP
    Clin Breast Cancer; 2014 Feb; 14(1):46-52. PubMed ID: 24176781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.