These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
279 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25082759)
1. Influence of the screw augmentation technique and a diameter increase on pedicle screw fixation in the osteoporotic spine: pullout versus fatigue testing. Kueny RA; Kolb JP; Lehmann W; Püschel K; Morlock MM; Huber G Eur Spine J; 2014 Oct; 23(10):2196-202. PubMed ID: 25082759 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Primary pedicle screw augmentation in osteoporotic lumbar vertebrae: biomechanical analysis of pedicle fixation strength. Burval DJ; McLain RF; Milks R; Inceoglu S Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 May; 32(10):1077-83. PubMed ID: 17471088 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Biomechanical evaluation of the pedicle screw insertion depth effect on screw stability under cyclic loading and subsequent pullout. Karami KJ; Buckenmeyer LE; Kiapour AM; Kelkar PS; Goel VK; Demetropoulos CK; Soo TM J Spinal Disord Tech; 2015 Apr; 28(3):E133-9. PubMed ID: 25310387 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Biomechanical properties of pedicle screw fixation augmented with allograft bone particles in osteoporotic vertebrae: different sizes and amounts. Jia C; Zhang R; Xing T; Gao H; Li H; Dong F; Zhang J; Ge P; Song P; Xu P; Zhang H; Shen C Spine J; 2019 Aug; 19(8):1443-1452. PubMed ID: 31009768 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. PMMA-augmentation of incompletely cannulated pedicle screws: a cadaver study to determine the benefits in the osteoporotic spine. Goost H; Deborre C; Wirtz DC; Burger C; Prescher A; Fölsch C; Pflugmacher R; Kabir K Technol Health Care; 2014; 22(4):607-15. PubMed ID: 24837053 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Biomechanical comparison of pedicle screw fixation strength in synthetic bones: Effects of screw shape, core/thread profile and cement augmentation. Liu MY; Tsai TT; Lai PL; Hsieh MK; Chen LH; Tai CL PLoS One; 2020; 15(2):e0229328. PubMed ID: 32084219 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Biomechanical comparative study of the stability of injectable pedicle screws with different lateral holes augmented with different volumes of polymethylmethacrylate in osteoporotic lumbar vertebrae. Liu D; Sheng J; Luo Y; Huang C; Wu HH; Zhou JJ; Zhang XJ; Zheng W Spine J; 2018 Sep; 18(9):1637-1644. PubMed ID: 29567517 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Novel augmentation technique of percutaneous pedicle screw fixation using hydroxyapatite granules in the osteoporotic lumbar spine: a cadaveric biomechanical analysis. Kanno H; Aizawa T; Hashimoto K; Itoi E Eur Spine J; 2021 Jan; 30(1):71-78. PubMed ID: 32424638 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of augmentation techniques on the failure of pedicle screws under cranio-caudal cyclic loading. Bostelmann R; Keiler A; Steiger HJ; Scholz A; Cornelius JF; Schmoelz W Eur Spine J; 2017 Jan; 26(1):181-188. PubMed ID: 25813011 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Biomechanical comparison of pedicle screw augmented with different volumes of polymethylmethacrylate in osteoporotic and severely osteoporotic cadaveric lumbar vertebrae: an experimental study. Liu D; Zhang B; Xie QY; Kang X; Zhou JJ; Wang CR; Lei W; Zheng W Spine J; 2016 Sep; 16(9):1124-32. PubMed ID: 27130374 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The impact of a distal expansion mechanism added to a standard pedicle screw on pullout resistance. A biomechanical study. Koller H; Zenner J; Hitzl W; Resch H; Stephan D; Augat P; Penzkofer R; Korn G; Kendell A; Meier O; Mayer M Spine J; 2013 May; 13(5):532-41. PubMed ID: 23415899 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Biomechanical analysis of pedicle screws in osteoporotic bone with bioactive cement augmentation using simulated in vivo multicomponent loading. Choma TJ; Frevert WF; Carson WL; Waters NP; Pfeiffer FM Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Mar; 36(6):454-62. PubMed ID: 20881517 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessment of different screw augmentation techniques and screw designs in osteoporotic spines. Becker S; Chavanne A; Spitaler R; Kropik K; Aigner N; Ogon M; Redl H Eur Spine J; 2008 Nov; 17(11):1462-9. PubMed ID: 18781342 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of the degree of osteoporosis on the biomechanical anchoring strength of the sacral pedicle screws: an in vitro comparison between unaugmented bicortical screws and polymethylmethacrylate augmented unicortical screws. Zhuang XM; Yu BS; Zheng ZM; Zhang JF; Lu WW Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Sep; 35(19):E925-31. PubMed ID: 20098349 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of pedicle screw diameter on screw fixation efficacy in human osteoporotic thoracic vertebrae. Lai DM; Shih YT; Chen YH; Chien A; Wang JL J Biomech; 2018 Mar; 70():196-203. PubMed ID: 29126607 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Pullout strength of pedicle screws with cement augmentation in severe osteoporosis: a comparative study between cannulated screws with cement injection and solid screws with cement pre-filling. Chen LH; Tai CL; Lee DM; Lai PL; Lee YC; Niu CC; Chen WJ BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2011 Feb; 12():33. PubMed ID: 21284883 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of the Pull-Out Strength between a Novel Micro-Dynamic Pedicle Screw and a Traditional Pedicle Screw in Lumbar Spine. Qian L; Chen W; Li P; Qu D; Liang W; Zheng M; Ouyang J Orthop Surg; 2020 Aug; 12(4):1285-1292. PubMed ID: 32776487 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A titanium expandable pedicle screw improves initial pullout strength as compared with standard pedicle screws. Vishnubhotla S; McGarry WB; Mahar AT; Gelb DE Spine J; 2011 Aug; 11(8):777-81. PubMed ID: 21802996 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Enhancing percutaneous pedicle screw fixation with hydroxyapatite granules: A biomechanical study using an osteoporotic bone model. Kanno H; Aizawa T; Hashimoto K; Itoi E PLoS One; 2019; 14(9):e0223106. PubMed ID: 31557234 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]