249 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25084029)
1. Biomechanical analysis of anterior versus posterior instrumentation following a thoracolumbar corpectomy: Laboratory investigation.
Viljoen SV; DeVries Watson NA; Grosland NM; Torner J; Dalm B; Hitchon PW
J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Oct; 21(4):577-81. PubMed ID: 25084029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Short Segment Spinal Instrumentation With Index Vertebra Pedicle Screw Placement for Pathologies Involving the Anterior and Middle Vertebral Column Is as Effective as Long Segment Stabilization With Cage Reconstruction: A Biomechanical Study.
Bartanusz V; Harris J; Moldavsky M; Cai Y; Bucklen B
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 Nov; 40(22):1729-36. PubMed ID: 26536447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Biomechanical testing of anterior and posterior thoracolumbar instrumentation in the cadaveric spine. Invited submission from the Joint Section Meeting on Disorders of the Spine and Peripheral Nerves, March 2004.
Eichholz KM; Hitchon PW; From A; Rubenbauer P; Nakamura S; Lim TH; Torner J
J Neurosurg Spine; 2004 Jul; 1(1):116-21. PubMed ID: 15291031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Biomechanical contribution of transverse connectors to segmental stability following long segment instrumentation with thoracic pedicle screws.
Kuklo TR; Dmitriev AE; Cardoso MJ; Lehman RA; Erickson M; Gill NW
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Jul; 33(15):E482-7. PubMed ID: 18594445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Biomechanical evaluation of short-segment posterior instrumentation with and without crosslinks in a human cadaveric unstable thoracolumbar burst fracture model.
Wahba GM; Bhatia N; Bui CN; Lee KH; Lee TQ
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Feb; 35(3):278-85. PubMed ID: 20075769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Biomechanical advantage of the index-level pedicle screw in unstable thoracolumbar junction fractures.
Baaj AA; Reyes PM; Yaqoobi AS; Uribe JS; Vale FL; Theodore N; Sonntag VK; Crawford NR
J Neurosurg Spine; 2011 Feb; 14(2):192-7. PubMed ID: 21214311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The biomechanical contribution of varying posterior constructs following anterior thoracolumbar corpectomy and reconstruction.
Bishop FS; Samuelson MM; Finn MA; Bachus KN; Brodke DS; Schmidt MH
J Neurosurg Spine; 2010 Aug; 13(2):234-9. PubMed ID: 20672960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Biomechanics of lateral plate and pedicle screw constructs in lumbar spines instrumented at two levels with laterally placed interbody cages.
Nayak AN; Gutierrez S; Billys JB; Santoni BG; Castellvi AE
Spine J; 2013 Oct; 13(10):1331-8. PubMed ID: 23685215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Two in vivo surgical approaches for lumbar corpectomy using allograft and a metallic implant: a controlled clinical and biomechanical study.
Huang P; Gupta MC; Sarigul-Klijn N; Hazelwood S
Spine J; 2006; 6(6):648-58. PubMed ID: 17088195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Biomechanical analysis of an expandable lateral cage and a static transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion cage with posterior instrumentation in an in vitro spondylolisthesis model.
Mantell M; Cyriac M; Haines CM; Gudipally M; O'Brien JR
J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Jan; 24(1):32-8. PubMed ID: 26384133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Biomechanical comparison of translaminar versus pedicle screws at T1 and T2 in long subaxial cervical constructs.
McGirt MJ; Sutter EG; Xu R; Sciubba DM; Wolinsky JP; Witham TF; Gokaslan ZL; Bydon A
Neurosurgery; 2009 Dec; 65(6 Suppl):167-72; discussion 172. PubMed ID: 19934991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Biomechanical evaluation of a simulated T-9 burst fracture of the thoracic spine with an intact rib cage.
Perry TG; Mageswaran P; Colbrunn RW; Bonner TF; Francis T; McLain RF
J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Sep; 21(3):481-8. PubMed ID: 24949903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Biomechanical analysis of an interspinous fusion device as a stand-alone and as supplemental fixation to posterior expandable interbody cages in the lumbar spine.
Gonzalez-Blohm SA; Doulgeris JJ; Aghayev K; Lee WE; Volkov A; Vrionis FD
J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Feb; 20(2):209-19. PubMed ID: 24286528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Biomechanical comparison of anterior cervical spine instrumentation techniques with and without supplemental posterior fusion after different corpectomy and discectomy combinations: Laboratory investigation.
Setzer M; Eleraky M; Johnson WM; Aghayev K; Tran ND; Vrionis FD
J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 Jun; 16(6):579-84. PubMed ID: 22423633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Biomechanical assessment of anterior lumbar interbody fusion with an anterior lumbosacral fixation screw-plate: comparison to stand-alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion and anterior lumbar interbody fusion with pedicle screws in an unstable human cadaver model.
Gerber M; Crawford NR; Chamberlain RH; Fifield MS; LeHuec JC; Dickman CA
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Apr; 31(7):762-8. PubMed ID: 16582849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Biomechanical analysis of four- versus six-screw constructs for short-segment pedicle screw and rod instrumentation of unstable thoracolumbar fractures.
Norton RP; Milne EL; Kaimrajh DN; Eismont FJ; Latta LL; Williams SK
Spine J; 2014 Aug; 14(8):1734-9. PubMed ID: 24462814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Biomechanical comparison of cervical spine reconstructive techniques after a multilevel corpectomy of the cervical spine.
Singh K; Vaccaro AR; Kim J; Lorenz EP; Lim TH; An HS
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Oct; 28(20):2352-8; discussion 2358. PubMed ID: 14560082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Less invasive posterior fixation method following transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a biomechanical analysis.
Slucky AV; Brodke DS; Bachus KN; Droge JA; Braun JT
Spine J; 2006; 6(1):78-85. PubMed ID: 16413452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Biomechanical comparison of iliac screws versus interbody femoral ring allograft on lumbosacral kinematics and sacral screw strain.
Cunningham BW; Sefter JC; Hu N; Kim SW; Bridwell KH; McAfee PC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Mar; 35(6):E198-205. PubMed ID: 20195199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Biomechanical evaluation of a dynamic pedicle screw fixation device.
Xu HZ; Wang XY; Chi YL; Zhu QA; Lin Y; Huang QS; Dai LY
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2006 May; 21(4):330-6. PubMed ID: 16434133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
