384 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25084072)
1. Test-retest agreement and reliability of quantitative sensory testing 1 year after breast cancer surgery.
Andersen KG; Kehlet H; Aasvang EK
Clin J Pain; 2015 May; 31(5):393-403. PubMed ID: 25084072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Test-retest reliability of thermal quantitative sensory testing on two sites within the L5 dermatome of the lumbar spine and lower extremity.
Knutti IA; Suter MR; Opsommer E
Neurosci Lett; 2014 Sep; 579():157-62. PubMed ID: 25064700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Sensory profiles in women with neuropathic pain after breast cancer surgery.
Mustonen L; Vollert J; Rice ASC; Kalso E; Harno H
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2020 Jul; 182(2):305-315. PubMed ID: 32458104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Absolute and Relative Reliability of a Comprehensive Quantitative Sensory Testing Protocol in Women Treated for Breast Cancer.
Dams L; Haenen V; Van der Gucht E; Devoogdt N; Smeets A; Bernar K; De Vrieze T; De Groef A; Meeus M
Pain Med; 2022 May; 23(6):1162-1175. PubMed ID: 34908144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Quantitative sensory testing in patients with postthoracotomy pain syndrome: Part 2: variability in thermal threshold assessments.
Wildgaard K; Ringsted TK; Kehlet H; Werner MU
Clin J Pain; 2013 Sep; 29(9):784-90. PubMed ID: 23328341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reliability of thermal quantitative sensory testing of the hand in a cohort of young, healthy adults.
Moloney NA; Hall TM; O'Sullivan TC; Doody CM
Muscle Nerve; 2011 Oct; 44(4):547-52. PubMed ID: 21826684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Association between sensory dysfunction and pain 1 week after breast cancer surgery: a psychophysical study.
Andersen KG; Duriaud HM; Aasvang EK; Kehlet H
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2016 Feb; 60(2):259-69. PubMed ID: 26446738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reliability and validity of quantitative sensory testing in persons with spinal cord injury and neuropathic pain.
Felix ER; Widerström-Noga EG
J Rehabil Res Dev; 2009; 46(1):69-83. PubMed ID: 19533521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Sensory function and pain in a population of patients treated for breast cancer.
Vilholm OJ; Cold S; Rasmussen L; Sindrup SH
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2009 Jul; 53(6):800-6. PubMed ID: 19397505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Multifactorial assessment of measurement errors affecting intraoral quantitative sensory testing reliability.
Moana-Filho EJ; Alonso AA; Kapos FP; Leon-Salazar V; Durand SH; Hodges JS; Nixdorf DR
Scand J Pain; 2017 Jul; 16():93-98. PubMed ID: 28850419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reliability study of thermal quantitative sensory testing in healthy Chinese.
Wang R; Cui L; Zhou W; Wang C; Zhang J; Wang K; Svensson P
Somatosens Mot Res; 2014 Dec; 31(4):198-203. PubMed ID: 24945099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Test-retest and interobserver reliability of quantitative sensory testing according to the protocol of the German Research Network on Neuropathic Pain (DFNS): a multi-centre study.
Geber C; Klein T; Azad S; Birklein F; Gierthmühlen J; Huge V; Lauchart M; Nitzsche D; Stengel M; Valet M; Baron R; Maier C; Tölle T; Treede RD
Pain; 2011 Mar; 152(3):548-556. PubMed ID: 21237569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Quantitative sensory testing in cluster headache: increased sensory thresholds.
Ladda J; Straube A; Förderreuther S; Krause P; Eggert T
Cephalalgia; 2006 Sep; 26(9):1043-50. PubMed ID: 16919054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Test order of quantitative sensory testing facilitates mechanical hyperalgesia in healthy volunteers.
Gröne E; Crispin A; Fleckenstein J; Irnich D; Treede RD; Lang PM
J Pain; 2012 Jan; 13(1):73-80. PubMed ID: 22208803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Relationship Between Sensory Loss and Persistent Pain 1 Year After Breast Cancer Surgery.
Andersen KG; Duriaud HM; Kehlet H; Aasvang EK
J Pain; 2017 Sep; 18(9):1129-1138. PubMed ID: 28502878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The long-term reliability of static and dynamic quantitative sensory testing in healthy individuals.
Marcuzzi A; Wrigley PJ; Dean CM; Adams R; Hush JM
Pain; 2017 Jul; 158(7):1217-1223. PubMed ID: 28328574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. How stable are quantitative sensory testing measurements over time? Report on 10-week reliability and agreement of results in healthy volunteers.
Nothnagel H; Puta C; Lehmann T; Baumbach P; Menard MB; Gabriel B; Gabriel HHW; Weiss T; Musial F
J Pain Res; 2017; 10():2067-2078. PubMed ID: 28919806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Development of somatosensory perception in children: a longitudinal QST-study.
Hirschfeld G; Zernikow B; Kraemer N; Hechler T; Aksu F; Krumova E; Maier C; Magerl W; Blankenburg M
Neuropediatrics; 2012 Feb; 43(1):10-6. PubMed ID: 22430155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reliability of static and dynamic quantitative sensory testing in patients with painful chronic pancreatitis.
Olesen SS; van Goor H; Bouwense SA; Wilder-Smith OH; Drewes AM
Reg Anesth Pain Med; 2012; 37(5):530-6. PubMed ID: 22854397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Quantitative sensory testing: a comprehensive protocol for clinical trials.
Rolke R; Magerl W; Campbell KA; Schalber C; Caspari S; Birklein F; Treede RD
Eur J Pain; 2006 Jan; 10(1):77-88. PubMed ID: 16291301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
