These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25084103)

  • 1. Wear properties of a novel resin composite compared to human enamel and other restorative materials.
    D'Arcangelo C; Vanini L; Rondoni GD; Pirani M; Vadini M; Gattone M; De Angelis F
    Oper Dent; 2014; 39(6):612-8. PubMed ID: 25084103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Wear Properties of Different Additive Restorative Materials Used for Onlay/Overlay Posterior Restorations.
    De Angelis F; D'Arcangelo C; Malíšková N; Vanini L; Vadini M
    Oper Dent; 2020; 45(3):E156-E166. PubMed ID: 32053459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Wear properties of dental ceramics and porcelains compared with human enamel.
    D'Arcangelo C; Vanini L; Rondoni GD; De Angelis F
    J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Mar; 115(3):350-5. PubMed ID: 26553254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Wear Evaluation of Prosthetic Materials Opposing Themselves.
    D'Arcangelo C; Vanini L; Rondoni GD; Vadini M; De Angelis F
    Oper Dent; 2018; 43(1):38-50. PubMed ID: 28857711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Wear of human enamel opposing monolithic zirconia, glass ceramic, and composite resin: an in vitro study.
    Sripetchdanond J; Leevailoj C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Nov; 112(5):1141-50. PubMed ID: 24980740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Wear Resistance of Bulk-fill Composite Resin Restorative Materials Polymerized under different Curing Intensities.
    Alkhudhairy F
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2017 Jan; 18(1):39-43. PubMed ID: 28050983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influence of the antagonist material on the wear of different composites using two different wear simulation methods.
    Heintze SD; Zellweger G; Cavalleri A; Ferracane J
    Dent Mater; 2006 Feb; 22(2):166-75. PubMed ID: 16087228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Wear of human enamel and nano-filled composite resin denture teeth under different loading forces.
    Ghazal M; Kern M
    J Oral Rehabil; 2009 Jan; 36(1):58-64. PubMed ID: 18976262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Wear testing of composite, gold, porcelain, and enamel opposing a removable cobalt-chromium partial denture alloy.
    Alarcon JV; Engelmeier RL; Powers JM; Triolo PT
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Jul; 18(5):421-6. PubMed ID: 19374708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. In vitro wear of indirect composite restoratives.
    Suzuki S; Nagai E; Taira Y; Minesaki Y
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Oct; 88(4):431-6. PubMed ID: 12447221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Wear of composite resin veneering materials and enamel in a chewing simulator.
    Mehl C; Scheibner S; Ludwig K; Kern M
    Dent Mater; 2007 Nov; 23(11):1382-9. PubMed ID: 17210173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of the wear resistance of new nanocomposite resin restorative materials.
    Yesil ZD; Alapati S; Johnston W; Seghi RR
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Jun; 99(6):435-43. PubMed ID: 18514665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Esthetic restorative materials and opposing enamel wear.
    Olivera AB; Marques MM
    Oper Dent; 2008; 33(3):332-7. PubMed ID: 18505225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Enamel wear of modified porcelains.
    Imai Y; Suzuki S; Fukushima S
    Am J Dent; 2000 Dec; 13(6):315-23. PubMed ID: 11764126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison of the wear resistance and hardness of indirect composite resins.
    Mandikos MN; McGivney GP; Davis E; Bush PJ; Carter JM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Apr; 85(4):386-95. PubMed ID: 11319537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Two-body wear of resin and ceramic denture teeth in comparison to human enamel.
    Ghazal M; Yang B; Ludwig K; Kern M
    Dent Mater; 2008 Apr; 24(4):502-7. PubMed ID: 17688934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17.
    Bolaca A; Erdogan Y
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2019 Mar; 22(3):313-319. PubMed ID: 30837417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Wear of feldspathic ceramic, nano-filled composite resin and acrylic resin artificial teeth when opposed to different antagonists.
    Ghazal M; Hedderich J; Kern M
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2008 Dec; 116(6):585-92. PubMed ID: 19049531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Wear rates of resin composites.
    Barkmeier WW; Erickson RI; Latta MA; Wilwerding TM
    Oper Dent; 2013; 38(2):226-33. PubMed ID: 22856679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Simulated oral wear of packable composites.
    Clelland NL; Villarroel SC; Knobloch LA; Seghi RR
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(6):830-7. PubMed ID: 14653301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.