These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25084108)

  • 41. Clinical Evaluation of Noncarious Cervical Lesions of Different Extensions Restored With Bulk-fill or Conventional Resin Composite: Preliminary Results of a Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Correia A; Jurema A; Andrade MR; Borges A; Bresciani E; Caneppele T
    Oper Dent; 2020; 45(1):E11-E20. PubMed ID: 31794342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. A new universal simplified adhesive: 18-month clinical evaluation.
    Perdigão J; Kose C; Mena-Serrano AP; De Paula EA; Tay LY; Reis A; Loguercio AD
    Oper Dent; 2014; 39(2):113-27. PubMed ID: 23802645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Clinical evaluation of resin-based composites in posterior restorations: two-year results.
    Arhun N; Celik C; Yamanel K
    Oper Dent; 2010; 35(4):397-404. PubMed ID: 20672723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Direct resin composite restorations versus indirect composite inlays: one-year results.
    Mendonça JS; Neto RG; Santiago SL; Lauris JR; Navarro MF; de Carvalho RM
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2010 May; 11(3):025-32. PubMed ID: 20461321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Effect of different modes of light curing and resin composites on microleakage of Class II restorations--Part II.
    Hardan LS; Amm EW; Ghayad A; Ghosn C; Khraisat A
    Odontostomatol Trop; 2009 Jun; 32(126):29-37. PubMed ID: 20069964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Cuspal deflection in premolar teeth restored using current composite resins with and without resin-modified glass ionomer liner.
    Karaman E; Ozgunaltay G
    Oper Dent; 2013; 38(3):282-9. PubMed ID: 23092141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Randomized controlled trial of the 2-year clinical performance of a silorane-based resin composite in class 1 posterior restorations.
    Efes BG; Yaman BC; Gurbuz O; Gumuştaş B
    Am J Dent; 2013 Feb; 26(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 23724547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Characterization and Comparative Analysis of Voids in Class II Composite Resin Restorations by Optical Coherence Tomography.
    Pardo Díaz CA; Shimokawa C; Sampaio CS; Freitas AZ; Turbino ML
    Oper Dent; 2020; 45(1):71-79. PubMed ID: 31226004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Clinical evaluation of nanofill and nanohybrid composite in Class I restorations: a 12-month randomized trial.
    Andrade AK; Duarte RM; Silva FD; Batista AU; Lima KC; Pontual ML; Montes MA
    Gen Dent; 2012; 60(4):e255-62. PubMed ID: 22782061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Two-year clinical evaluation of composite resins in non-carious cervical lesions.
    Qin W; Song Z; Ye YY; Lin ZM
    Clin Oral Investig; 2013 Apr; 17(3):799-804. PubMed ID: 22797530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Clinical Performance of Bulk-Fill Resin Composite Restorations Using the United States Public Health Service and Federation Dentaire Internationale Criteria: A 12-Month Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Durão MA; Andrade AKM; Santos MDCMDS; Montes MAJR; Monteiro GQM
    Eur J Dent; 2021 May; 15(2):179-192. PubMed ID: 33242913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Retrospective evaluation of posterior direct composite restorations: 10-year findings.
    Lempel E; Tóth Á; Fábián T; Krajczár K; Szalma J
    Dent Mater; 2015 Feb; 31(2):115-22. PubMed ID: 25480695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Influence of chlorhexidine digluconate on the clinical performance of adhesive restorations: a 3-year follow-up.
    Sartori N; Stolf SC; Silva SB; Lopes GC; Carrilho M
    J Dent; 2013 Dec; 41(12):1188-95. PubMed ID: 24076103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. 36-Month Randomized Clinical Trial Evaluation of Preheated and Room Temperature Resin Composite.
    Elkaffas AA; Eltoukhy RI; Elnegoly SA; Mahmoud SH
    Oper Dent; 2022 Jan; 47(1):11-19. PubMed ID: 35226749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. One-year clinical performance of self-etch adhesives in posterior restorations.
    Perdigão J; Dutra-Corrêa M; Castilhos N; Carmo AR; Anauate-Netto C; Cordeiro HJ; Amore R; Lewgoy HR
    Am J Dent; 2007 Apr; 20(2):125-33. PubMed ID: 17542208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Clinical performance and wear resistance of two compomers in posterior occlusal restorations of permanent teeth: six-year follow-up.
    Lund RG; Sehn FP; Piva E; Detoni D; Moura FR; Cardoso PE; Demarco FF
    Oper Dent; 2007; 32(2):118-23. PubMed ID: 17427819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Practice-based, clinical trial of a silorane-based composite resin system in posterior teeth.
    Malhotra N; Somashekar ST; Mala K; Pai V; Shenoy R
    SADJ; 2013 Sep; 68(8):358, 360-3. PubMed ID: 24660403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Clinical Performance of Direct Posterior Composite Restorations in Patients with Amelogenesis Imperfecta.
    Tekçe N; Demirci M; Sancak EI; Güder G; Tuncer S; Baydemir C
    Oper Dent; 2022 Nov; 47(6):620-629. PubMed ID: 36281978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Clinical performance of novel resin composites in posterior teeth: 18-month results.
    Ergücü Z; Türkün LS
    J Adhes Dent; 2007 Apr; 9(2):209-16. PubMed ID: 17489483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Effect of different modes of light curing and resin composites on microleakage of Class II restorations.
    Hardan LS; Amm EW; Ghayad A
    Odontostomatol Trop; 2008 Dec; 31(124):27-34. PubMed ID: 19441264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.