These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25084630)

  • 1. Commentary to: including upper extremity robotic therapy during early inpatient stroke rehabilitation may not lead to better outcomes than conventional treatment.
    Tong RK
    J Physiother; 2014 Sep; 60(3):166. PubMed ID: 25084630
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Including upper extremity robotic therapy during early inpatient stroke rehabilitation may not lead to better outcomes than conventional treatment.
    Pang MY
    J Physiother; 2014 Sep; 60(3):166. PubMed ID: 25084629
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Randomized trial of a robotic assistive device for the upper extremity during early inpatient stroke rehabilitation.
    Masiero S; Armani M; Ferlini G; Rosati G; Rossi A
    Neurorehabil Neural Repair; 2014 May; 28(4):377-86. PubMed ID: 24316679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Post-stroke robotic training of the upper limb in the early rehabilitation phase.
    Masiero S; Rosati G; Valarini S; Rossi A
    Funct Neurol; 2009; 24(4):203-6. PubMed ID: 20412726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effects of error-augmentation versus error-reduction paradigms in robotic therapy to enhance upper extremity performance and recovery post-stroke: a systematic review.
    Liu LY; Li Y; Lamontagne A
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2018 Jul; 15(1):65. PubMed ID: 29973250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Robotic therapy provides a stimulus for upper limb motor recovery after stroke that is complementary to and distinct from conventional therapy.
    Brokaw EB; Nichols D; Holley RJ; Lum PS
    Neurorehabil Neural Repair; 2014 May; 28(4):367-76. PubMed ID: 24297763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of exercise training effect with different robotic devices for upper limb rehabilitation: a retrospective study.
    Colombo R; Pisano F; Delconte C; Mazzone A; Grioni G; Castagna M; Bazzini G; Imarisio C; Maggioni G; Pistarini C
    Eur J Phys Rehabil Med; 2017 Apr; 53(2):240-248. PubMed ID: 27676203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Home-based Computer Assisted Arm Rehabilitation (hCAAR) robotic device for upper limb exercise after stroke: results of a feasibility study in home setting.
    Sivan M; Gallagher J; Makower S; Keeling D; Bhakta B; O'Connor RJ; Levesley M
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2014 Dec; 11():163. PubMed ID: 25495889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Does assist-as-needed upper limb robotic therapy promote participation in repetitive activity-based motor training in sub-acute stroke patients with severe paresis?
    Grosmaire AG; Duret C
    NeuroRehabilitation; 2017; 41(1):31-39. PubMed ID: 28527224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Design and control of RUPERT: a device for robotic upper extremity repetitive therapy.
    Sugar TG; He J; Koeneman EJ; Koeneman JB; Herman R; Huang H; Schultz RS; Herring DE; Wanberg J; Balasubramanian S; Swenson P; Ward JA
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2007 Sep; 15(3):336-46. PubMed ID: 17894266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effector force requirements to enable robotic systems to provide assisted exercise in people with upper limb impairment after stroke.
    Jackson AE; Culmer PR; Levesley MC; Cozens JA; Makower SG; Bhakta BB
    IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2011; 2011():5975391. PubMed ID: 22275595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Robotic-assisted rehabilitation of the upper limb after acute stroke.
    Masiero S; Celia A; Rosati G; Armani M
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2007 Feb; 88(2):142-9. PubMed ID: 17270510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Robotic and Sensor Technology for Upper Limb Rehabilitation.
    Jakob I; Kollreider A; Germanotta M; Benetti F; Cruciani A; Padua L; Aprile I
    PM R; 2018 Sep; 10(9 Suppl 2):S189-S197. PubMed ID: 30269805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Combining Dopaminergic Facilitation with Robot-Assisted Upper Limb Therapy in Stroke Survivors: A Focused Review.
    Tran DA; Pajaro-Blazquez M; Daneault JF; Gallegos JG; Pons J; Fregni F; Bonato P; Zafonte R
    Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 2016 Jun; 95(6):459-74. PubMed ID: 26829074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A robotic workstation for stroke rehabilitation of the upper extremity using FES.
    Freeman CT; Hughes AM; Burridge JH; Chappell PH; Lewin PL; Rogers E
    Med Eng Phys; 2009 Apr; 31(3):364-73. PubMed ID: 18640865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Hand Rehabilitation Robotics on Poststroke Motor Recovery.
    Yue Z; Zhang X; Wang J
    Behav Neurol; 2017; 2017():3908135. PubMed ID: 29230081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. RUPERT closed loop control design.
    Balasubramanian S; Wei R; He J
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2008; 2008():3467-70. PubMed ID: 19163455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. How could robotic training and botolinum toxin be combined in chronic post stroke upper limb spasticity? A pilot study.
    Pennati GV; Da Re C; Messineo I; Bonaiuti D
    Eur J Phys Rehabil Med; 2015 Aug; 51(4):381-7. PubMed ID: 25358636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Rehabilitation robotics for the upper extremity: review with new directions for orthopaedic disorders.
    Hakim RM; Tunis BG; Ross MD
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2017 Nov; 12(8):765-771. PubMed ID: 28035841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Robot assisted upper limb therapy combined with upper limb rehabilitation was at least as effective on a range of outcomes, and cost less to deliver, as an equal dose of upper limb rehabilitation alone for people with stroke.
    Imms C; Wallen M; Laver K
    Aust Occup Ther J; 2015 Feb; 62(1):74-6. PubMed ID: 25649038
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.