BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25084633)

  • 1. Forest plots.
    Verhagen AP; Ferreira ML
    J Physiother; 2014 Sep; 60(3):170-3. PubMed ID: 25084633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Finding your way out of the forest without a trail of bread crumbs: development and evaluation of two novel displays of forest plots.
    Schild AH; Voracek M
    Res Synth Methods; 2015 Mar; 6(1):74-86. PubMed ID: 26035471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Multiple uses of forest plots in presenting analysis results in health research: A Tutorial.
    Li G; Zeng J; Tian J; Levine MAH; Thabane L
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2020 Jan; 117():89-98. PubMed ID: 31589955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Association between unreported outcomes and effect size estimates in Cochrane meta-analyses.
    Furukawa TA; Watanabe N; Omori IM; Montori VM; Guyatt GH
    JAMA; 2007 Feb; 297(5):468-70. PubMed ID: 17284696
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Understanding the Basics of Meta-Analysis and How to Read a Forest Plot: As Simple as It Gets.
    Andrade C
    J Clin Psychiatry; 2020 Oct; 81(5):. PubMed ID: 33027562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of randomized trials: principles and pitfalls.
    da Costa BR; Juni P
    Eur Heart J; 2014 Dec; 35(47):3336-45. PubMed ID: 25416325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessing the impact of attrition in randomized controlled trials.
    Hewitt CE; Kumaravel B; Dumville JC; Torgerson DJ;
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 Nov; 63(11):1264-70. PubMed ID: 20573482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
    Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Use of re-randomized data in meta-analysis.
    Hozo I; Djulbegovic B; Clark O; Lyman GH
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2005 May; 5():17. PubMed ID: 15882470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. How to read a forest plot in a meta-analysis.
    Sedgwick P
    BMJ; 2015 Jul; 351():h4028. PubMed ID: 26208517
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Updating meta-analyses leads to larger type I errors than publication bias.
    Borm GF; Donders AR
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Aug; 62(8):825-830.e10. PubMed ID: 19136233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Robustness assessments are needed to reduce bias in meta-analyses that include zero-event randomized trials.
    Keus F; Wetterslev J; Gluud C; Gooszen HG; van Laarhoven CJ
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2009 Mar; 104(3):546-51. PubMed ID: 19262513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Issues in the meta-analysis of cluster randomized trials.
    Donner A; Klar N
    Stat Med; 2002 Oct; 21(19):2971-80. PubMed ID: 12325113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The simplest statistical test: how to check for a difference between treatments.
    Pocock SJ
    BMJ; 2006 May; 332(7552):1256-8. PubMed ID: 16735336
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Graphics for dissemination of meta-analyses to staff nurses.
    Floyd JA; Galvin EA; Roop JC; Oermann MH; Nordstrom CK
    Nurse Res; 2010; 18(1):72-86. PubMed ID: 21138087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Biostatistical applications in epidemiology.
    Kier KL
    Pharmacotherapy; 2011 Jan; 31(1):9-22. PubMed ID: 21182354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Meta-analysis of raw mean differences.
    Bond CF; Wiitala WL; Richard FD
    Psychol Methods; 2003 Dec; 8(4):406-18. PubMed ID: 14664679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Interpreting forest plots and funnel plots in meta-analysis.
    Raina SK
    Neurol India; 2016; 64(4):840. PubMed ID: 27381156
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Single-center trials show larger treatment effects than multicenter trials: evidence from a meta-epidemiologic study.
    Dechartres A; Boutron I; Trinquart L; Charles P; Ravaud P
    Ann Intern Med; 2011 Jul; 155(1):39-51. PubMed ID: 21727292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Impact of allocation concealment on conclusions drawn from meta-analyses of randomized trials.
    Pildal J; Hróbjartsson A; Jørgensen KJ; Hilden J; Altman DG; Gøtzsche PC
    Int J Epidemiol; 2007 Aug; 36(4):847-57. PubMed ID: 17517809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.