108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25084671)
1. The quantitative and qualitative recovery of Campylobacter from raw poultry using USDA and Health Canada methods.
Sproston EL; Carrillo CD; Boulter-Bitzer J
Food Microbiol; 2014 Dec; 44():258-63. PubMed ID: 25084671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of different sampling techniques and enumeration methods for the isolation and quantification of Campylobacter spp. in raw retail chicken legs.
Scherer K; Bartelt E; Sommerfeld C; Hildebrandt G
Int J Food Microbiol; 2006 Apr; 108(1):115-9. PubMed ID: 16545475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of ISO 10272:2006 standard versus alternative enrichment and plating combinations for enumeration and detection of Campylobacter in chicken meat.
Habib I; Uyttendaele M; De Zutter L
Food Microbiol; 2011 Sep; 28(6):1117-23. PubMed ID: 21645809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Performance characteristics and estimation of measurement uncertainty of three plating procedures for Campylobacter enumeration in chicken meat.
Habib I; Sampers I; Uyttendaele M; Berkvens D; De Zutter L
Food Microbiol; 2008 Feb; 25(1):65-74. PubMed ID: 17993378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A Baseline Quantitative Survey of Campylobacter spp. on Retail Chicken Portions and Carcasses in Metropolitan Perth, Western Australia.
Habib I; Coles J; Fallows M; Goodchild S
Foodborne Pathog Dis; 2019 Mar; 16(3):180-186. PubMed ID: 30457884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Simple and rapid detection of Campylobacter spp. in naturally contaminated chicken-meat samples by combination of a two-step enrichment method with an immunochromatographic assay.
Kawatsu K; Taguchi M; Yonekita T; Matsumoto T; Morimatsu F; Kumeda Y
Int J Food Microbiol; 2010 Aug; 142(1-2):256-9. PubMed ID: 20621373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Impact of rearing conditions on the microbiological quality of raw retail poultry meat.
Hardy B; Crilly N; Pendleton S; Andino A; Wallis A; Zhang N; Hanning I
J Food Sci; 2013 Aug; 78(8):M1232-5. PubMed ID: 23957412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A Bayesian modelling framework to estimate Campylobacter prevalence and culture methods sensitivity: application to a chicken meat survey in Belgium.
Habib I; Sampers I; Uyttendaele M; De Zutter L; Berkvens D
J Appl Microbiol; 2008 Dec; 105(6):2002-8. PubMed ID: 19120647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Processing practices contributing to Campylobacter contamination in Belgian chicken meat preparations.
Sampers I; Habib I; Berkvens D; Dumoulin A; Zutter LD; Uyttendaele M
Int J Food Microbiol; 2008 Dec; 128(2):297-303. PubMed ID: 18947895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Quantitative risk assessment of Campylobacter spp. in poultry based meat preparations as one of the factors to support the development of risk-based microbiological criteria in Belgium.
Uyttendaele M; Baert K; Ghafir Y; Daube G; De Zutter L; Herman L; Dierick K; Pierard D; Dubois JJ; Horion B; Debevere J
Int J Food Microbiol; 2006 Sep; 111(2):149-63. PubMed ID: 16876277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Review of current methodologies to isolate and identify Campylobacter spp. from foods.
Gharst G; Oyarzabal OA; Hussain SK
J Microbiol Methods; 2013 Oct; 95(1):84-92. PubMed ID: 23899774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Non-stochastic sampling error in quantal analyses for Campylobacter species on poultry products.
Irwin P; Reed S; Brewster J; Nguyen L; He Y
Anal Bioanal Chem; 2013 Mar; 405(7):2353-69. PubMed ID: 23380949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Quantification of Campylobacter spp. in chicken carcass rinse by real-time PCR.
Botteldoorn N; Van Coillie E; Piessens V; Rasschaert G; Debruyne L; Heyndrickx M; Herman L; Messens W
J Appl Microbiol; 2008 Dec; 105(6):1909-18. PubMed ID: 19016974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Method-dependent variability in determination of prevalence of Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli in Canadian retail poultry.
Carrillo CD; Plante D; Iugovaz I; Kenwell R; Bélanger G; Boucher F; Poulin N; Trottier YL
J Food Prot; 2014 Oct; 77(10):1682-8. PubMed ID: 25285484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparative performance of isolation methods using Preston broth, Bolton broth and their modifications for the detection of Campylobacter spp. from naturally contaminated fresh and frozen raw poultry meat.
Seliwiorstow T; De Zutter L; Houf K; Botteldoorn N; Baré J; Van Damme I
Int J Food Microbiol; 2016 Oct; 234():60-64. PubMed ID: 27391222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Novel Campylobacter isolation method using hydrophobic grid membrane filter and semisolid medium.
Valdivieso-Garcia A; Harris K; Riche E; Campbell S; Jarvie A; Popa M; Deckert A; Reid-Smith R; Rahn K
J Food Prot; 2007 Feb; 70(2):355-62. PubMed ID: 17340869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. PCR assay for the detection of Campylobacter in marinated and non-marinated poultry products.
Katzav M; Isohanni P; Lund M; Hakkinen M; Lyhs U
Food Microbiol; 2008 Oct; 25(7):908-14. PubMed ID: 18721681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of the "testing and scheduling" strategy for control of Campylobacter in broiler meat in The Netherlands.
Nauta MJ; van der Wal FJ; Putirulan FF; Post J; van de Kassteele J; Bolder NM
Int J Food Microbiol; 2009 Sep; 134(3):216-22. PubMed ID: 19674803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effects of Campylobacter numbers in caeca on the contamination of broiler carcasses with Campylobacter.
Reich F; Atanassova V; Haunhorst E; Klein G
Int J Food Microbiol; 2008 Sep; 127(1-2):116-20. PubMed ID: 18657873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Rapid detection and differentiation of important Campylobacter spp. in poultry samples by dot blot and PCR.
Fontanot M; Iacumin L; Cecchini F; Comi G; Manzano M
Food Microbiol; 2014 Oct; 43():28-34. PubMed ID: 24929879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
