These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25085005)

  • 1. Prosthetics socket that incorporates an air splint system focusing on dynamic interface pressure.
    Razak NA; Osman NA; Gholizadeh H; Ali S
    Biomed Eng Online; 2014 Aug; 13():108. PubMed ID: 25085005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. WITHDRAWN: Patient-specific interface pressure case study at transradial prosthetic socket: comparison trials between ICRC polypropylene socket and air splint socket.
    Abd Razak NA; Abu Osman NA; Ali SA; Gholizadeh H
    Eur J Phys Rehabil Med; 2016 Jan; ():. PubMed ID: 26771916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An anthropomorphic transhumeral prosthesis socket developed based on an oscillometric pump and controlled by force-sensitive resistor pressure signals.
    Razak NA; Gholizadeh H; Hasnan N; Osman NA; Fadzil SS; Hashim NA
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 2017 Feb; 62(1):49-55. PubMed ID: 27166714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An adaptive socket with auto-adjusting air bladders for interfacing transhumeral prosthesis: A pilot study.
    Gu Y; Yang D; Osborn L; Candrea D; Liu H; Thakor N
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2019 Aug; 233(8):812-822. PubMed ID: 31165676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Biomechanics principle of elbow joint for transhumeral prostheses: comparison of normal hand, body-powered, myoelectric & air splint prostheses.
    Abd Razak NA; Abu Osman NA; Gholizadeh H; Ali S
    Biomed Eng Online; 2014 Sep; 13():134. PubMed ID: 25208636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Optical fiber Bragg grating-instrumented silicone liner for interface pressure measurement within prosthetic sockets of lower-limb amputees.
    Al-Fakih E; Arifin N; Pirouzi G; Mahamd Adikan FR; Shasmin HN; Abu Osman NA
    J Biomed Opt; 2017 Aug; 22(8):1-8. PubMed ID: 28822140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Finite element analysis of the contact interface between trans-femoral stump and prosthetic socket.
    Zhang L; Zhu M; Shen L; Zheng F
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2013; 2013():1270-3. PubMed ID: 24109926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of Dermo and Seal-In X5 prosthetic liners on pressure distributions and reported satisfaction during ramp ambulation in persons with transtibial limb loss.
    Ali S; Osman NA; Razak A; Hussain S; Wan Abas WA
    Eur J Phys Rehabil Med; 2015 Feb; 51(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 24963603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Static and dynamic pressure prediction for prosthetic socket fitting assessment utilising an inverse problem approach.
    Sewell P; Noroozi S; Vinney J; Amali R; Andrews S
    Artif Intell Med; 2012 Jan; 54(1):29-41. PubMed ID: 21963113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Characterization of interfacial socket pressure in transhumeral prostheses: A case series.
    Schofield JS; Schoepp KR; Williams HE; Carey JP; Marasco PD; Hebert JS
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(6):e0178517. PubMed ID: 28575012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An experimental study of the interface pressure profile during level walking of a new suspension system for lower limb amputees.
    Eshraghi A; Abu Osman NA; Gholizadeh H; Ali S; Sævarsson SK; Wan Abas WA
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2013 Jan; 28(1):55-60. PubMed ID: 23157843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An investigation on effects of amputee's physiological parameters on maximum pressure developed at the prosthetic socket interface using artificial neural network.
    Nayak C; Singh A; Chaudhary H; Unune DR
    Technol Health Care; 2017 Oct; 25(5):969-979. PubMed ID: 28854522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dynamic interface pressure distributions of two transtibial prosthetic socket concepts.
    Dumbleton T; Buis AW; McFadyen A; McHugh BF; McKay G; Murray KD; Sexton S
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2009; 46(3):405-15. PubMed ID: 19675992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A pressure and shear sensor system for stress measurement at lower limb residuum/socket interface.
    Laszczak P; McGrath M; Tang J; Gao J; Jiang L; Bader DL; Moser D; Zahedi S
    Med Eng Phys; 2016 Jul; 38(7):695-700. PubMed ID: 27118308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Development of an air pneumatic suspension system for transtibial prostheses.
    Pirouzi G; Abu Osman NA; Oshkour AA; Ali S; Gholizadeh H; Abas WA
    Sensors (Basel); 2014 Sep; 14(9):16754-65. PubMed ID: 25207872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Piezoelectric bimorphs' characteristics as in-socket sensors for transfemoral amputees.
    El-Sayed AM; Hamzaid NA; Abu Osman NA
    Sensors (Basel); 2014 Dec; 14(12):23724-41. PubMed ID: 25513823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Instrumented socket inserts for sensing interaction at the limb-socket interface.
    Swanson EC; McLean JB; Allyn KJ; Redd CB; Sanders JE
    Med Eng Phys; 2018 Jan; 51():111-118. PubMed ID: 29229405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Predictive prosthetic socket design: part 2-generating person-specific candidate designs using multi-objective genetic algorithms.
    Steer JW; Grudniewski PA; Browne M; Worsley PR; Sobey AJ; Dickinson AS
    Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2020 Aug; 19(4):1347-1360. PubMed ID: 31741116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influence of the scale reduction in designing sockets for trans-tibial amputees.
    Dakhil N; Tarrade T; Behr M; Mo F; Evin M; Thefenne L; Liu T; Llari M
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2020 Aug; 234(8):761-768. PubMed ID: 32475295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A Scoping Review of Pressure Measurements in Prosthetic Sockets of Transfemoral Amputees during Ambulation: Key Considerations for Sensor Design.
    Ko ST; Asplund F; Zeybek B
    Sensors (Basel); 2021 Jul; 21(15):. PubMed ID: 34372253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.