251 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25085303)
1. Bone stress and strain after use of a miniplate for molar protraction and uprighting: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
Largura LZ; Argenta MA; Sakima MT; Camargo ES; Guariza-Filho O; Tanaka OM
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Aug; 146(2):198-206. PubMed ID: 25085303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Three-dimensional modeling and finite element analysis in treatment planning for orthodontic tooth movement.
Ammar HH; Ngan P; Crout RJ; Mucino VH; Mukdadi OM
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Jan; 139(1):e59-71. PubMed ID: 21195258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of a newly designed onplant miniplate anchorage system.
Liu L; Qu YY; Jiang LJ; Zhou Q; Tang TQ
J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci; 2016 Jun; 36(3):422-427. PubMed ID: 27376815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Indirect miniscrew anchorage: biomechanical loading of the dental anchorage during mandibular molar protraction-an FEM analysis.
Holberg C; Winterhalder P; Holberg N; Wichelhaus A; Rudzki-Janson I
J Orofac Orthop; 2014 Jan; 75(1):16-24. PubMed ID: 24448924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Maxillary posterior intrusion mechanics with mini-implant anchorage evaluated with the finite element method.
Çifter M; Saraç M
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Nov; 140(5):e233-41. PubMed ID: 22051501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Mandibular anterior intrusion using miniscrews for skeletal anchorage: A 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
González Del Castillo McGrath M; Araujo-Monsalvo VM; Murayama N; Martínez-Cruz M; Justus-Doczi R; Domínguez-Hernández VM; Ondarza-Rovira R
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 Oct; 154(4):469-476. PubMed ID: 30268257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Bone stress when miniplates are used for orthodontic anchorage: finite element analysis.
Huang YW; Chang CH; Wong TY; Liu JK
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Oct; 142(4):466-72. PubMed ID: 22999669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Finite element analysis of the effect of force directions on tooth movement in extraction space closure with miniscrew sliding mechanics.
Kojima Y; Kawamura J; Fukui H
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Oct; 142(4):501-8. PubMed ID: 22999674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Theoretical efficacy of preventive measures for pathologic fracture after surgical removal of mandibular lesions based on a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Murakami K; Yamamoto K; Tsuyuki M; Sugiura T; Tsutsumi S; Kirita T
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Apr; 72(4):833.e1-18. PubMed ID: 24635857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Displacement and stress distribution of the maxillofacial complex during maxillary protraction with buccal versus palatal plates: finite element analysis.
Kim KY; Bayome M; Park JH; Kim KB; Mo SS; Kook YA
Eur J Orthod; 2015 Jun; 37(3):275-83. PubMed ID: 25090997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Two distalization methods compared in a novel patient-specific finite element analysis.
Ammoury MJ; Mustapha S; Dechow PC; Ghafari JG
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2019 Sep; 156(3):326-336. PubMed ID: 31474262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Molar uprighting with mini screws: comparison among different systems and relative biomechanical analysis.
Musilli M; Marsico M; Romanucci A; Grampone F
Prog Orthod; 2010; 11(2):166-73. PubMed ID: 20974454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Biomechanical effectiveness of cortical bone thickness on orthodontic microimplant stability: an evaluation based on the load share between cortical and cancellous bone.
Alrbata RH; Yu W; Kyung HM
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Aug; 146(2):175-82. PubMed ID: 25085300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Stress distribution in the mini-screw and alveolar bone during orthodontic treatment: a finite element study analysis.
Kuroda S; Nishii Y; Okano S; Sueishi K
J Orthod; 2014 Dec; 41(4):275-84. PubMed ID: 24812100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Biomechanical evaluation of an orthodontic miniimplant used with revolving (translation and rotation) temporary anchorage device by finite element analysis and experimental testing.
Lin YS; Yu JH; Chang YZ; Lin CL
Implant Dent; 2013 Feb; 22(1):77-82. PubMed ID: 23303268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Stress and displacement between maxillary protraction with miniplates placed at the infrazygomatic crest and the lateral nasal wall: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
Lee NK; Baek SH
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Mar; 141(3):345-351. PubMed ID: 22381495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Biomechanical characteristics of microimplant for anchorage in orthodontics: a 3D finite element model study.
Naidu DL; Harini T; Prasad CM; Lakshmi HV; Lokesh NK; Dharmesh HS
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 Nov; 14(6):1076-9. PubMed ID: 24858754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparative finite element analysis of the biomechanical stability of 2.0 fixation plates in atrophic mandibular fractures.
Vajgel A; Camargo IB; Willmersdorf RB; de Melo TM; Laureano Filho JR; Vasconcellos RJ
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Feb; 71(2):335-42. PubMed ID: 23351762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The efficacy of maxillary protraction protocols with the micro-implant-assisted rapid palatal expander (MARPE) and the novel N2 mini-implant-a finite element study.
Moon W; Wu KW; MacGinnis M; Sung J; Chu H; Youssef G; Machado A
Prog Orthod; 2015; 16():16. PubMed ID: 26061987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Three-dimensional dental model analysis of treatment outcomes for protrusive maxillary dentition: comparison of headgear, miniscrew, and miniplate skeletal anchorage.
Lai EH; Yao CC; Chang JZ; Chen I; Chen YJ
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Nov; 134(5):636-45. PubMed ID: 18984395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
