249 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25085303)
21. Numeric simulations of en-masse space closure with sliding mechanics.
Kojima Y; Fukui H
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Dec; 138(6):702.e1-6; discussion 702-4. PubMed ID: 21130318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Effects of a newly designed orthodontic miniplate platform for elevating the miniplate over the gingiva: A 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
Aykaç V; Ulusoy Ç; Türköz Ç
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Jul; 148(1):110-22. PubMed ID: 26124034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Stability of zygomatic plate-screw orthodontic anchorage system: a finite element analysis.
Veziroglu F; Uckan S; Ozden UA; Arman A
Angle Orthod; 2008 Sep; 78(5):902-7. PubMed ID: 18298210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Efficient usage of implant anchorage to treat overerupted maxillary first molar and mesially inclined mandibular molars.
Ohura R; Kuroda S; Takahashi T; Tomita Y; Tanaka E
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Jan; 139(1):113-22. PubMed ID: 21195284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Lower molar uprighting with miniscrew anchorage: direct and indirect anchorage.
Melo AC; Duarte da Silva R; Shimizu RH; Campos D; Andrighetto AR
Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2013; 24(3):9-14. PubMed ID: 24358649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Analysis of stress distribution on fixation of bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy with resorbable plates and screws using the finite-element method.
Sarkarat F; Motamedi MH; Bohluli B; Moharamnejad N; Ansari S; Shahabi-Sirjani H
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Jun; 70(6):1434-8. PubMed ID: 21820783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Use of miniscrews as temporary anchorage devices in orthodontic practice. I--Introduction.
Anka G
Aust Orthod J; 2006 Nov; 22(2):131-9. PubMed ID: 17203577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Finite Element Analysis of Bone Stress for Miniscrew Implant Proximal to Root Under Occlusal Force and Implant Loading.
Shan LH; Guo N; Zhou GJ; Qie H; Li CX; Lu L
J Craniofac Surg; 2015 Oct; 26(7):2072-6. PubMed ID: 26207429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Miniplates as skeletal anchorage for treating mandibular second molar impactions.
Miyahira YI; Maltagliati LA; Siqueira DF; Romano R
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jul; 134(1):145-8. PubMed ID: 18617114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparison of five different fixation techniques of sagittal split ramus osteotomy using three-dimensional finite elements analysis.
Sato FR; Asprino L; Noritomi PY; da Silva JV; de Moraes M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Aug; 41(8):934-41. PubMed ID: 22510341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Changes in stress distribution of orthodontic miniscrews and surrounding bone evaluated by 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
Suzuki A; Masuda T; Takahashi I; Deguchi T; Suzuki O; Takano-Yamamoto T
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Dec; 140(6):e273-80. PubMed ID: 22133961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Threaded versus porous-surfaced implants as anchorage units for orthodontic treatment: three-dimensional finite element analysis of peri-implant bone tissue stresses.
Pilliar RM; Sagals G; Meguid SA; Oyonarte R; Deporter DA
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(6):879-89. PubMed ID: 17190297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Deflection and stress distribution around mini-screw implants: a finite element investigation into the effect of cortical bone thickness, force magnitude and direction.
Meher AH; Shrivastav SS; Vibhute PJ; Hazarey PV
J Orthod; 2012 Dec; 39(4):249-55. PubMed ID: 23269688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Biomechanical effects of corticotomy approaches on dentoalveolar structures during canine retraction: A 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
Yang C; Wang C; Deng F; Fan Y
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Sep; 148(3):457-65. PubMed ID: 26321344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. [Uprighting of a tipped lower second molar with the aid of a microscrew anchorage. A case report].
Wehr CP; Fritz UB; Diedrich PR
Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed; 2006; 116(2):173-9. PubMed ID: 16524219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A finite element analysis of the optimal bending angles in a running loop for mesial translation of a mandibular molar using indirect skeletal anchorage.
Kim MJ; Park JH; Kojima Y; Tai K; Chae JM
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2018 Feb; 21(1):63-70. PubMed ID: 29271058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Stress distribution and displacement by different bone-borne palatal expanders with micro-implants: a three-dimensional finite-element analysis.
Lee HK; Bayome M; Ahn CS; Kim SH; Kim KB; Mo SS; Kook YA
Eur J Orthod; 2014 Oct; 36(5):531-40. PubMed ID: 23148112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Finite element analysis of mono- and bicortical mini-implant stability.
Holberg C; Winterhalder P; Rudzki-Janson I; Wichelhaus A
Eur J Orthod; 2014 Oct; 36(5):550-6. PubMed ID: 23598610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Three-dimensional finite-element analysis of a central lower incisor under labial and lingual loads.
Lombardo L; Stefanoni F; Mollica F; Laura A; Scuzzo G; Siciliani G
Prog Orthod; 2012 Sep; 13(2):154-63. PubMed ID: 23021119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Effects of cleft type, facemask anchorage method, and alveolar bone graft on maxillary protraction: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Yang IH; Chang YI; Kim TW; Ahn SJ; Lim WH; Lee NK; Baek SH
Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2012 Mar; 49(2):221-9. PubMed ID: 21740169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
