These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25085453)

  • 1. Reply to "on the stimulation depth of transcranial magnetic stimulation coils".
    Roth Y; Pell GS; Chistyakov AV; Sinai A; Zangen A; Zaaroor M
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2015 Apr; 126(4):844-5. PubMed ID: 25085453
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. On the stimulation depth of transcranial magnetic stimulation coils.
    Deng ZD; Lisanby SH; Peterchev AV
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2015 Apr; 126(4):843-4. PubMed ID: 25088734
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. What do we learn from the influence of motor activities on the after-effect of non-invasive brain stimulation?
    Huang YZ
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2016 Feb; 127(2):1011-1012. PubMed ID: 26679419
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Motor cortex activation by H-coil and figure-8 coil at different depths. Combined motor threshold and electric field distribution study.
    Roth Y; Pell GS; Chistyakov AV; Sinai A; Zangen A; Zaaroor M
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2014 Feb; 125(2):336-43. PubMed ID: 23994191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A method to measure the distribution of latencies of motor evoked potentials in man.
    Firmin L; Müller S; Rösler KM
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2011 Jan; 122(1):176-82. PubMed ID: 20630798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Short- and intermediate-interval cortical inhibition and facilitation assessed by navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation.
    Säisänen L; Julkunen P; Niskanen E; Hukkanen T; Mervaala E; Karhu J; Könönen M
    J Neurosci Methods; 2011 Feb; 195(2):241-8. PubMed ID: 21144864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Within-subject effect of coil-to-cortex distance on cortical electric field threshold and motor evoked potentials in transcranial magnetic stimulation.
    Julkunen P; Säisänen L; Danner N; Awiszus F; Könönen M
    J Neurosci Methods; 2012; 206(2):158-64. PubMed ID: 22401794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Motor evoked potential latency, motor threshold and electric field measurements as indices of transcranial magnetic stimulation depth.
    Roth Y; Pell GS; Zangen A
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2010 Feb; 121(2):255-8; author reply 258-9. PubMed ID: 19815456
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Electrode-distance dependent after-effects of transcranial direct and random noise stimulation with extracephalic reference electrodes.
    Moliadze V; Antal A; Paulus W
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2010 Dec; 121(12):2165-71. PubMed ID: 20554472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Does interhemispheric communication relate to the bilateral function of muscles? A study of scapulothoracic muscles using transcranial magnetic stimulation.
    Matthews D; Murtagh P; Risso A; Jones G; Alexander CM
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2013 Dec; 23(6):1370-4. PubMed ID: 23954022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Involvement of the motor cortex in the bimanual unloading reaction: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study.
    Kazennikov OV; Solopova IA; Talis VL; Grishin AA; Ioffe ME
    Neurosci Behav Physiol; 2006 Feb; 36(2):177-83. PubMed ID: 16380831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Plasticity of motor cortex induced by coordination and training.
    Tyč F; Boyadjian A
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2011 Jan; 122(1):153-62. PubMed ID: 21168091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Study of the motor cortex excitability in the task of holding load].
    Kazennikov OV; Levik IuS
    Fiziol Cheloveka; 2009; 35(5):71-8. PubMed ID: 19899694
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Voluntary movement reverses the effect of cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on corticomotor excitability.
    Ataoglu EE; Caglayan HB; Cengiz B
    Exp Brain Res; 2017 Sep; 235(9):2653-2659. PubMed ID: 28577024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Convergence of flexor reflex and corticospinal inputs on tibialis anterior network in humans.
    Mackey AS; Uttaro D; McDonough MP; Krivis LI; Knikou M
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2016 Jan; 127(1):706-715. PubMed ID: 26122072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Time-dependent changes in motor cortical excitability by electrical stimulation combined with voluntary drive.
    Sugawara K; Yamaguchi T; Tanabe S; Suzuki T; Saito K; Higashi T
    Neuroreport; 2014 Apr; 25(6):404-9. PubMed ID: 24356108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Representation of cricothyroid muscles at the primary motor cortex (M1) in healthy subjects, mapped by navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (nTMS).
    Espadaler J; Rogić M; Deletis V; Leon A; Quijada C; Conesa G
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2012 Nov; 123(11):2205-11. PubMed ID: 22621909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of two different continuous theta burst stimulation paradigms applied to the human primary motor cortex.
    Goldsworthy MR; Pitcher JB; Ridding MC
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2012 Nov; 123(11):2256-63. PubMed ID: 22633917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cumulative effects of single TMS pulses during beta-tACS are stimulation intensity-dependent.
    Raco V; Bauer R; Norim S; Gharabaghi A
    Brain Stimul; 2017; 10(6):1055-1060. PubMed ID: 28779945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quadro-pulse stimulation is more effective than paired-pulse stimulation for plasticity induction of the human motor cortex.
    Hamada M; Hanajima R; Terao Y; Arai N; Furubayashi T; Inomata-Terada S; Yugeta A; Matsumoto H; Shirota Y; Ugawa Y
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Dec; 118(12):2672-82. PubMed ID: 17977788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.