223 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25086519)
1. Independent calculation of dose distributions for helical tomotherapy using a conventional treatment planning system.
Klüter S; Schubert K; Lissner S; Sterzing F; Oetzel D; Debus J; Schlegel W; Oelfke U; Nill S
Med Phys; 2014 Aug; 41(8):081709. PubMed ID: 25086519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Phantomless patient-specific TomoTherapy QA via delivery performance monitoring and a secondary Monte Carlo dose calculation.
Handsfield LL; Jones R; Wilson DD; Siebers JV; Read PW; Chen Q
Med Phys; 2014 Oct; 41(10):101703. PubMed ID: 25281942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical implementation of Dosimetry Check™ for TomoTherapy
Chung E; Kwon D; Park T; Kang H; Chung Y
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 Nov; 19(6):193-199. PubMed ID: 30354001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Fast, simple, and informative patient-specific dose verification method for intensity modulated total marrow irradiation with helical tomotherapy.
Takahashi Y; Hui SK
Radiat Oncol; 2014 Jan; 9():34. PubMed ID: 24461048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dosimetric effects of rotational output variation and x-ray target degradation on helical tomotherapy plans.
Staton RJ; Langen KM; Kupelian PA; Meeks SL
Med Phys; 2009 Jul; 36(7):2881-8. PubMed ID: 19673187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessment of Monte Carlo algorithm for compliance with RTOG 0915 dosimetric criteria in peripheral lung cancer patients treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy.
Pokhrel D; Sood S; Badkul R; Jiang H; McClinton C; Lominska C; Kumar P; Wang F
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 May; 17(3):277-293. PubMed ID: 27167284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Dose calculation software for helical tomotherapy, utilizing patient CT data to calculate an independent three-dimensional dose cube.
Thomas SJ; Eyre KR; Tudor GS; Fairfoul J
Med Phys; 2012 Jan; 39(1):160-7. PubMed ID: 22225285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Fluence-weighted average subfield size in helical TomoTherapy.
Howitz S; Wiezorek T; Wittig A; Vorwerk H; Zink K
Z Med Phys; 2019 Dec; 29(4):337-348. PubMed ID: 31056376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. ARCHERRT - a GPU-based and photon-electron coupled Monte Carlo dose computing engine for radiation therapy: software development and application to helical tomotherapy.
Su L; Yang Y; Bednarz B; Sterpin E; Du X; Liu T; Ji W; Xu XG
Med Phys; 2014 Jul; 41(7):071709. PubMed ID: 24989378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Independent absorbed-dose calculation using the Monte Carlo algorithm in volumetric modulated arc therapy.
Haga A; Magome T; Takenaka S; Imae T; Sakumi A; Nomoto A; Igaki H; Shiraishi K; Yamashita H; Ohtomo K; Nakagawa K
Radiat Oncol; 2014 Mar; 9():75. PubMed ID: 24625221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Impact of the fixed gantry angle approximation on dosimetric accuracy for helical tomotherapy plans.
Tudor GS; Thomas SJ
Med Phys; 2013 Jan; 40(1):011711. PubMed ID: 23298081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Motion as perturbation. II. Development of the method for dosimetric analysis of motion effects with fixed-gantry IMRT.
Nelms BE; Opp D; Zhang G; Moros E; Feygelman V
Med Phys; 2014 Jun; 41(6):061704. PubMed ID: 24877799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dosimetric impacts of gantry angle misalignment on prostate cancer treatment using helical tomotherapy.
Su FC; Shi C; Crownover R; Swanson G; Papanikolaou N
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2008 Aug; 7(4):287-93. PubMed ID: 18642967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of the efficiency and effectiveness of independent dose calculation followed by machine log file analysis against conventional measurement based IMRT QA.
Sun B; Rangaraj D; Boddu S; Goddu M; Yang D; Palaniswaamy G; Yaddanapudi S; Wooten O; Mutic S
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2012 Sep; 13(5):3837. PubMed ID: 22955649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Commissioning of the Mobius3D independent dose verification system for TomoTherapy.
Kodama T; Saito Y; Hatanaka S; Hariu M; Shimbo M; Takahashi T
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 May; 20(5):12-20. PubMed ID: 30920130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Monte Carlo evaluation of tissue inhomogeneity effects in the treatment of the head and neck.
Wang L; Yorke E; Chui CS
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2001 Aug; 50(5):1339-49. PubMed ID: 11483347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. TransitQA - A new method for transit dosimetry of Tomotherapy patients.
Pisaturo O; Miéville F; Tercier PA; Allal AS
Med Phys; 2018 Jan; 45(1):438-447. PubMed ID: 29136280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dosimetric comparison of helical tomotherapy treatment plans for total marrow irradiation created using GPU and CPU dose calculation engines.
Nalichowski A; Burmeister J
Med Phys; 2013 Jul; 40(7):071716. PubMed ID: 23822420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Three-dimensional analysis of the respiratory interplay effect in helical tomotherapy: Baseline variations cause the greater part of dose inhomogeneities seen.
Tudor GS; Harden SV; Thomas SJ
Med Phys; 2014 Mar; 41(3):031704. PubMed ID: 24593708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Treatment plan comparison between helical tomotherapy and MLC-based IMRT using radiobiological measures.
Mavroidis P; Ferreira BC; Shi C; Lind BK; Papanikolaou N
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jul; 52(13):3817-36. PubMed ID: 17664579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
