218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25086519)
21. Impact of grid size on uniform scanning and IMPT plans in XiO treatment planning system for brain cancer.
Rana S; Zheng Y
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Sep; 16(5):447–456. PubMed ID: 26699310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Clinical experience with EPID dosimetry for prostate IMRT pre-treatment dose verification.
McDermott LN; Wendling M; van Asselen B; Stroom J; Sonke JJ; van Herk M; Mijnheer BJ
Med Phys; 2006 Oct; 33(10):3921-30. PubMed ID: 17089854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Position-probability-sampled Monte Carlo calculation of VMAT, 3DCRT, step-shoot IMRT, and helical tomotherapy dose distributions using BEAMnrc/DOSXYZnrc.
Belec J; Ploquin N; La Russa DJ; Clark BG
Med Phys; 2011 Feb; 38(2):948-60. PubMed ID: 21452731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Stereotactic body radiotherapy using the forward-planned static-port tomotherapy for lung cancer: a novel planning technique with the newly-developed mode.
Manabe Y; Miyakawa A; Kondo T; Yamada Y; Hashimoto S; Ishikura S; Shibamoto Y
J Radiat Res; 2020 Nov; 61(6):993-998. PubMed ID: 33210148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Independent verification of transferred delivery sinogram between two dosimetrically matched helical tomotherapy machines: a protocol for patient-specific quality assurance.
Yaddanapudi S; Oddiraju S; Rodriguez V; Green OL; Low DA; Rangaraj D; Mutic S; Goddu SM
Phys Med Biol; 2012 Sep; 57(17):5617-31. PubMed ID: 22892686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Quantitative assessment of the accuracy of dose calculation using pencil beam and Monte Carlo algorithms and requirements for clinical quality assurance.
Ali I; Ahmad S
Med Dosim; 2013; 38(3):255-61. PubMed ID: 23558145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. An efficient procedure for tomotherapy treatment plan verification using the on-board detector.
Pisaturo O; Miéville F; Tercier PA; Allal AS
Phys Med Biol; 2015 Feb; 60(4):1625-39. PubMed ID: 25622205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. An in vivo dose verification method for SBRT-VMAT delivery using the EPID.
McCowan PM; Van Uytven E; Van Beek T; Asuni G; McCurdy BM
Med Phys; 2015 Dec; 42(12):6955-63. PubMed ID: 26632051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Converting Treatment Plans From Helical Tomotherapy to L-Shape Linac: Clinical Workflow and Dosimetric Evaluation.
Yuan Z; Nair CK; Benedict SH; Valicenti RK; Rao S; Fragoso RC; Wright C; Qiu J; Rong Y
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2018 Jan; 17():1533033818785279. PubMed ID: 29986638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The influence of different IMRT techniques on the peripheral dose: a comparison between sMLM-IMRT and helical tomotherapy.
Wiezorek T; Schwahofer A; Schubert K
Strahlenther Onkol; 2009 Oct; 185(10):696-702. PubMed ID: 19806336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The use of non-standard CT conversion ramps for Monte Carlo verification of 6 MV prostate IMRT plans.
Zarza-Moreno M; Cardoso I; Teixeira N; Jesus AP; Mora G
Phys Med; 2013 Jun; 29(4):357-67. PubMed ID: 22677401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. KVCT, MVCT, and hybrid CT image studies--treatment planning and dose delivery equivalence on helical tomotherapy.
Martin S; Yartsev S
Med Phys; 2010 Jun; 37(6):2847-54. PubMed ID: 20632596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Accuracy of dose calculation algorithms for static and rotational IMRT of lung cancer: A phantom study.
Sini C; Broggi S; Fiorino C; Cattaneo GM; Calandrino R
Phys Med; 2015 Jun; 31(4):382-90. PubMed ID: 25801284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Consistency check of planned adaptive option on helical tomotherapy.
Schirm M; Yartsev S; Bauman G; Battista J; Van Dyk J
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2008 Dec; 7(6):425-32. PubMed ID: 19044321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Dosimetric accuracy of tomotherapy dose calculation in thorax lesions.
Ardu V; Broggi S; Cattaneo GM; Mangili P; Calandrino R
Radiat Oncol; 2011 Feb; 6():14. PubMed ID: 21306629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Impact of the MLC leaf-tip model in a commercial TPS: Dose calculation limitations and IROC-H phantom failures.
Koger B; Price R; Wang D; Toomeh D; Geneser S; Ford E
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2020 Feb; 21(2):82-88. PubMed ID: 31961036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Monte Carlo calculation of helical tomotherapy dose delivery.
Zhao YL; Mackenzie M; Kirkby C; Fallone BG
Med Phys; 2008 Aug; 35(8):3491-500. PubMed ID: 18777909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Dose verification of an IMRT treatment planning system with the BEAM EGS4-based Monte Carlo code.
Francescon P; Cora S; Chiovati P
Med Phys; 2003 Feb; 30(2):144-57. PubMed ID: 12607832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Helical tomotherapy versus single-arc intensity-modulated arc therapy: a collaborative dosimetric comparison between two institutions.
Rong Y; Tang G; Welsh JS; Mohiuddin MM; Paliwal B; Yu CX
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2011 Sep; 81(1):284-96. PubMed ID: 21236598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. A method to reconstruct and apply 3D primary fluence for treatment delivery verification.
Liu S; Mazur TR; Li H; Curcuru A; Green OL; Sun B; Mutic S; Yang D
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Jan; 18(1):128-138. PubMed ID: 28291913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
