198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25086520)
1. On the suitability of ultrathin detectors for absorbed dose assessment in the presence of high-density heterogeneities.
Bueno M; Carrasco P; Jornet N; Muñoz-Montplet C; Duch MA
Med Phys; 2014 Aug; 41(8):081710. PubMed ID: 25086520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of dose calculation algorithms in slab phantoms with cortical bone equivalent heterogeneities.
Carrasco P; Jornet N; Duch MA; Panettieri V; Weber L; Eudaldo T; Ginjaume M; Ribas M
Med Phys; 2007 Aug; 34(8):3323-33. PubMed ID: 17879796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Determination of the KQclinfclin,Qmsr fmsr correction factors for detectors used with an 800 MU/min CyberKnife(®) system equipped with fixed collimators and a study of detector response to small photon beams using a Monte Carlo method.
Moignier C; Huet C; Makovicka L
Med Phys; 2014 Jul; 41(7):071702. PubMed ID: 24989371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Response of LiF:Mg,Ti thermoluminescent dosimeters at photon energies relevant to the dosimetry of brachytherapy (<1 MeV).
Tedgren AC; Hedman A; Grindborg JE; Carlsson GA
Med Phys; 2011 Oct; 38(10):5539-50. PubMed ID: 21992372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Determination of absorbed dose to water around a clinical HDR (192)Ir source using LiF:Mg,Ti TLDs demonstrates an LET dependence of detector response.
Carlsson Tedgren A; Elia R; Hedtjarn H; Olsson S; Alm Carlsson G
Med Phys; 2012 Feb; 39(2):1133-40. PubMed ID: 22320824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Using LiF:Mg,Cu,P TLDs to estimate the absorbed dose to water in liquid water around an 192Ir brachytherapy source.
Lucas PA; Aubineau-Lanièce I; Lourenço V; Vermesse D; Cutarella D
Med Phys; 2014 Jan; 41(1):011711. PubMed ID: 24387503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Energy correction factors of LiF powder TLDs irradiated in high-energy electron beams and applied to mailed dosimetry for quality assurance networks.
Marre D; Ferreira IH; Bridier A; Björeland A; Svensson H; Dutreix A; Chavaudra J
Phys Med Biol; 2000 Dec; 45(12):3657-74. PubMed ID: 11131191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Electron fluence correction factors for various materials in clinical electron beams.
Olivares M; DeBlois F; Podgorsak EB; Seuntjens JP
Med Phys; 2001 Aug; 28(8):1727-34. PubMed ID: 11548943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. LiF:Mg,Ti TLD response as a function of photon energy for moderately filtered x-ray spectra in the range of 20-250 kVp relative to 60Co.
Nunn AA; Davis SD; Micka JA; DeWerd LA
Med Phys; 2008 May; 35(5):1859-69. PubMed ID: 18561661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Suitability of microDiamond detectors for the determination of absorbed dose to water around high-dose-rate
Kaveckyte V; Malusek A; Benmakhlouf H; Alm Carlsson G; Carlsson Tedgren Å
Med Phys; 2018 Jan; 45(1):429-437. PubMed ID: 29171060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of dose calculation algorithms in phantoms with lung equivalent heterogeneities under conditions of lateral electronic disequilibrium.
Carrasco P; Jornet N; Duch MA; Weber L; Ginjaume M; Eudaldo T; Jurado D; Ruiz A; Ribas M
Med Phys; 2004 Oct; 31(10):2899-911. PubMed ID: 15543799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Characterization of nanoDot optically stimulated luminescence detectors and high-sensitivity MCP-N thermoluminescent detectors in the 40-300 kVp energy range.
Poirier Y; Kuznetsova S; Villarreal-Barajas JE
Med Phys; 2018 Jan; 45(1):402-413. PubMed ID: 29164632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Monte Carlo simulation of MOSFET detectors for high-energy photon beams using the PENELOPE code.
Panettieri V; Duch MA; Jornet N; Ginjaume M; Carrasco P; Badal A; Ortega X; Ribas M
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jan; 52(1):303-16. PubMed ID: 17183143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Investigation of a synthetic diamond detector response in kilovoltage photon beams.
Kaveckyte V; Persson L; Malusek A; Benmakhlouf H; Alm Carlsson G; Carlsson Tedgren Å
Med Phys; 2020 Mar; 47(3):1268-1279. PubMed ID: 31880809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Variations in dose response with x-ray energy of LiF:Mg,Cu,P thermoluminescence dosimeters: implications for clinical dosimetry.
Duggan L; Hood C; Warren-Forward H; Haque M; Kron T
Phys Med Biol; 2004 Sep; 49(17):3831-45. PubMed ID: 15470908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Absorbed dose measurements from a
D'Arienzo M; Pimpinella M; De Coste V; Capogni M; Ferrari P; Mariotti F; Iaccarino G; Ungania S; Strigari L
Phys Med; 2020 Jan; 69():127-133. PubMed ID: 31901837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Technical note: Influence of the phantom material on the absorbed-dose energy dependence of the EBT3 radiochromic film for photons in the energy range 3 keV-18 MeV.
Hermida-López M; Lüdemann L; Flühs A; Brualla L
Med Phys; 2014 Nov; 41(11):112103. PubMed ID: 25370654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Absorbed dose measurements of a handheld 50 kVP X-ray source in water with thermoluminescence dosemeters.
Soares C; Drupieski C; Wingert B; Pritchett G; Pagonis V; O'Brien M; Sliski A; Bilski P; Olko P
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 120(1-4):78-82. PubMed ID: 16735571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A practical method for quantifying dose in bone and lung using TLDs when using 6 and 15 MV photon beams.
Sarigul N; Surucu M; Reft C; Malin M; Yegingil Z; Aydogan B
Phys Med Biol; 2020 Mar; 65(5):05NT01. PubMed ID: 32028274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of improved TLD dosimetry on the determination of dose rate constants for (125)I and (103)Pd brachytherapy seeds.
Rodriguez M; Rogers DW
Med Phys; 2014 Nov; 41(11):114301. PubMed ID: 25370677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
