These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

308 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25086534)

  • 1. A complete software application for automatic registration of x-ray mammography and magnetic resonance images.
    Solves-Llorens JA; Rupérez MJ; Monserrat C; Feliu E; García M; Lloret M
    Med Phys; 2014 Aug; 41(8):081903. PubMed ID: 25086534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Breast lesion co-localisation between X-ray and MR images using finite element modelling.
    Lee AW; Rajagopal V; Babarenda Gamage TP; Doyle AJ; Nielsen PM; Nash MP
    Med Image Anal; 2013 Dec; 17(8):1256-64. PubMed ID: 23860392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. MRI to X-ray mammography registration using a volume-preserving affine transformation.
    Mertzanidou T; Hipwell J; Cardoso MJ; Zhang X; Tanner C; Ourselin S; Bick U; Huisman H; Karssemeijer N; Hawkes D
    Med Image Anal; 2012 Jul; 16(5):966-75. PubMed ID: 22513136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fusion of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance mammography at 3.0T with X-ray mammograms: pilot study evaluation using dedicated semi-automatic registration software.
    Dietzel M; Hopp T; Ruiter N; Zoubi R; Runnebaum IB; Kaiser WA; Baltzer PA
    Eur J Radiol; 2011 Aug; 79(2):e98-e102. PubMed ID: 21570793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Automatic multimodal 2D/3D breast image registration using biomechanical FEM models and intensity-based optimization.
    Hopp T; Dietzel M; Baltzer PA; Kreisel P; Kaiser WA; Gemmeke H; Ruiter NV
    Med Image Anal; 2013 Feb; 17(2):209-18. PubMed ID: 23265802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Automated registration of diagnostic to prediagnostic x-ray mammograms: evaluation and comparison to radiologists' accuracy.
    Pinto Pereira SM; Hipwell JH; McCormack VA; Tanner C; Moss SM; Wilkinson LS; Khoo LA; Pagliari C; Skippage PL; Kliger CJ; Hawkes DJ; Silva IM
    Med Phys; 2010 Sep; 37(9):4530-9. PubMed ID: 20964170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fully Automated Quantitative Estimation of Volumetric Breast Density from Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Images: Preliminary Results and Comparison with Digital Mammography and MR Imaging.
    Pertuz S; McDonald ES; Weinstein SP; Conant EF; Kontos D
    Radiology; 2016 Apr; 279(1):65-74. PubMed ID: 26491909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A new validation method for X-ray mammogram registration algorithms using a projection model of breast X-ray compression.
    Hipwell JH; Tanner C; Crum WR; Schnabel JA; Hawkes DJ
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2007 Sep; 26(9):1190-200. PubMed ID: 17896592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Correlation between mammographic density and volumetric fibroglandular tissue estimated on breast MR images.
    Wei J; Chan HP; Helvie MA; Roubidoux MA; Sahiner B; Hadjiiski LM; Zhou C; Paquerault S; Chenevert T; Goodsitt MM
    Med Phys; 2004 Apr; 31(4):933-42. PubMed ID: 15125012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Towards an in-plane methodology to track breast lesions using mammograms and patient-specific finite-element simulations.
    Lapuebla-Ferri A; Cegoñino-Banzo J; Jiménez-Mocholí AJ; Del Palomar AP
    Phys Med Biol; 2017 Nov; 62(22):8720-8738. PubMed ID: 29091591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Quantitative evaluation of free-form deformation registration for dynamic contrast-enhanced MR mammography.
    Tanner C; Schnabel JA; Hill DL; Hawkes DJ; Degenhard A; Leach MO; Hose DR; Hall-Craggs MA; Usiskin SI
    Med Phys; 2007 Apr; 34(4):1221-33. PubMed ID: 17500454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Influence of using manual or automatic breast density information in a mass detection CAD system.
    Oliver A; Lladó X; Freixenet J; Martí R; Pérez E; Pont J; Zwiggelaar R
    Acad Radiol; 2010 Jul; 17(7):877-83. PubMed ID: 20540910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Co-registration of MR-mammography and X-ray mammography.
    Dietzel M; Baltzer PA; Hopp T; Ruiter NV; Kaiser WA
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Sep; 81 Suppl 1():S27-9. PubMed ID: 23083591
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Breast MRI and X-ray mammography registration using gradient values.
    García E; Diez Y; Diaz O; Lladó X; Gubern-Mérida A; Martí R; Martí J; Oliver A
    Med Image Anal; 2019 May; 54():76-87. PubMed ID: 30836308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Correspondence in texture features between two mammographic views.
    Gupta S; Markey MK
    Med Phys; 2005 Jun; 32(6):1598-606. PubMed ID: 16013719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Automatic identification and classification of characteristic kinetic curves of breast lesions on DCE-MRI.
    Chen W; Giger ML; Bick U; Newstead GM
    Med Phys; 2006 Aug; 33(8):2878-87. PubMed ID: 16964864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Validation of nonrigid image registration using finite-element methods: application to breast MR images.
    Schnabel JA; Tanner C; Castellano-Smith AD; Degenhard A; Leach MO; Hose DR; Hill DL; Hawkes DJ
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2003 Feb; 22(2):238-47. PubMed ID: 12716000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Fatty and fibroglandular tissue volumes in the breasts of women 20-83 years old: comparison of X-ray mammography and computer-assisted MR imaging.
    Lee NA; Rusinek H; Weinreb J; Chandra R; Toth H; Singer C; Newstead G
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Feb; 168(2):501-6. PubMed ID: 9016235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Deformable mapping using biomechanical models to relate corresponding lesions in digital breast tomosynthesis and automated breast ultrasound images.
    Green CA; Goodsitt MM; Roubidoux MA; Brock KK; Davis CL; Lau JH; Carson PL
    Med Image Anal; 2020 Feb; 60():101599. PubMed ID: 31760192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fusion of contrast-enhanced breast MR and mammographic imaging data.
    Behrenbruch CP; Marias K; Armitage PA; Yam M; Moore N; English RE; Clarke J; Brady M
    Med Image Anal; 2003 Sep; 7(3):311-40. PubMed ID: 12946471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.