307 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25086537)
1. A new and fast image feature selection method for developing an optimal mammographic mass detection scheme.
Tan M; Pu J; Zheng B
Med Phys; 2014 Aug; 41(8):081906. PubMed ID: 25086537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Optimization of breast mass classification using sequential forward floating selection (SFFS) and a support vector machine (SVM) model.
Tan M; Pu J; Zheng B
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2014 Nov; 9(6):1005-20. PubMed ID: 24664267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Improving performance of computer-aided detection scheme by combining results from two machine learning classifiers.
Park SC; Pu J; Zheng B
Acad Radiol; 2009 Mar; 16(3):266-74. PubMed ID: 19201355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Developing a new case based computer-aided detection scheme and an adaptive cueing method to improve performance in detecting mammographic lesions.
Tan M; Aghaei F; Wang Y; Zheng B
Phys Med Biol; 2017 Jan; 62(2):358-376. PubMed ID: 27997380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A new approach to develop computer-aided detection schemes of digital mammograms.
Tan M; Qian W; Pu J; Liu H; Zheng B
Phys Med Biol; 2015 Jun; 60(11):4413-27. PubMed ID: 25984710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Computerized detection of breast tissue asymmetry depicted on bilateral mammograms: a preliminary study of breast risk stratification.
Wang X; Lederman D; Tan J; Wang XH; Zheng B
Acad Radiol; 2010 Oct; 17(10):1234-41. PubMed ID: 20619697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Computer-aided detection; the effect of training databases on detection of subtle breast masses.
Zheng B; Wang X; Lederman D; Tan J; Gur D
Acad Radiol; 2010 Nov; 17(11):1401-8. PubMed ID: 20650667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Computer-aided classification of mammographic masses using visually sensitive image features.
Wang Y; Aghaei F; Zarafshani A; Qiu Y; Qian W; Zheng B
J Xray Sci Technol; 2017; 25(1):171-186. PubMed ID: 27911353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Applying a new quantitative image analysis scheme based on global mammographic features to assist diagnosis of breast cancer.
Chen X; Zargari A; Hollingsworth AB; Liu H; Zheng B; Qiu Y
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2019 Oct; 179():104995. PubMed ID: 31443864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A method to test the reproducibility and to improve performance of computer-aided detection schemes for digitized mammograms.
Zheng B; Gur D; Good WF; Hardesty LA
Med Phys; 2004 Nov; 31(11):2964-72. PubMed ID: 15587648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessment of performance and reproducibility of applying a content-based image retrieval scheme for classification of breast lesions.
Gundreddy RR; Tan M; Qiu Y; Cheng S; Liu H; Zheng B
Med Phys; 2015 Jul; 42(7):4241-9. PubMed ID: 26133622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Improving performance of computer-aided detection of masses by incorporating bilateral mammographic density asymmetry: an assessment.
Wang X; Li L; Xu W; Liu W; Lederman D; Zheng B
Acad Radiol; 2012 Mar; 19(3):303-10. PubMed ID: 22173323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reduction of false-positive recalls using a computerized mammographic image feature analysis scheme.
Tan M; Pu J; Zheng B
Phys Med Biol; 2014 Aug; 59(15):4357-73. PubMed ID: 25029964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A completely automated CAD system for mass detection in a large mammographic database.
Bellotti R; De Carlo F; Tangaro S; Gargano G; Maggipinto G; Castellano M; Massafra R; Cascio D; Fauci F; Magro R; Raso G; Lauria A; Forni G; Bagnasco S; Cerello P; Zanon E; Cheran SC; Lopez Torres E; Bottigli U; Masala GL; Oliva P; Retico A; Fantacci ME; Cataldo R; De Mitri I; De Nunzio G
Med Phys; 2006 Aug; 33(8):3066-75. PubMed ID: 16964885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. False-positive reduction in computer-aided mass detection using mammographic texture analysis and classification.
Dhahbi S; Barhoumi W; Kurek J; Swiderski B; Kruk M; Zagrouba E
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2018 Jul; 160():75-83. PubMed ID: 29728249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Optimization of Network Topology in Computer-Aided Detection Schemes Using Phased Searching with NEAT in a Time-Scaled Framework.
Tan M; Pu J; Zheng B
Cancer Inform; 2014; 13(Suppl 1):17-27. PubMed ID: 25392680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Characterization of mammographic masses based on level set segmentation with new image features and patient information.
Shi J; Sahiner B; Chan HP; Ge J; Hadjiiski L; Helvie MA; Nees A; Wu YT; Wei J; Zhou C; Zhang Y; Cui J
Med Phys; 2008 Jan; 35(1):280-90. PubMed ID: 18293583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Characterization of masses in digital breast tomosynthesis: comparison of machine learning in projection views and reconstructed slices.
Chan HP; Wu YT; Sahiner B; Wei J; Helvie MA; Zhang Y; Moore RH; Kopans DB; Hadjiiski L; Way T
Med Phys; 2010 Jul; 37(7):3576-86. PubMed ID: 20831065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Improving Performance of Breast Cancer Risk Prediction by Incorporating Optical Density Image Feature Analysis: An Assessment.
Yan S; Wang Y; Aghaei F; Qiu Y; Zheng B
Acad Radiol; 2022 Jan; 29 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S199-S210. PubMed ID: 28985925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Fissures segmentation using surface features: content-based retrieval for mammographic mass using ensemble classifier.
Liu H; Lan Y; Xu X; Song E; Hung CC
Acad Radiol; 2011 Dec; 18(12):1475-84. PubMed ID: 22055794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
