These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25086544)

  • 1. The simulation of 3D mass models in 2D digital mammography and breast tomosynthesis.
    Shaheen E; De Keyzer F; Bosmans H; Dance DR; Young KC; Van Ongeval C
    Med Phys; 2014 Aug; 41(8):081913. PubMed ID: 25086544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The simulation of 3D microcalcification clusters in 2D digital mammography and breast tomosynthesis.
    Shaheen E; Van Ongeval C; Zanca F; Cockmartin L; Marshall N; Jacobs J; Young KC; R Dance D; Bosmans H
    Med Phys; 2011 Dec; 38(12):6659-71. PubMed ID: 22149848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Detection of masses in digital breast tomosynthesis using complementary information of simulated projection.
    Kim ST; Kim DH; Ro YM
    Med Phys; 2015 Dec; 42(12):7043-58. PubMed ID: 26632059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A computer simulation study comparing lesion detection accuracy with digital mammography, breast tomosynthesis, and cone-beam CT breast imaging.
    Gong X; Glick SJ; Liu B; Vedula AA; Thacker S
    Med Phys; 2006 Apr; 33(4):1041-52. PubMed ID: 16696481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Design and validation of realistic breast models for use in multiple alternative forced choice virtual clinical trials.
    Elangovan P; Mackenzie A; Dance DR; Young KC; Cooke V; Wilkinson L; Given-Wilson RM; Wallis MG; Wells K
    Phys Med Biol; 2017 Apr; 62(7):2778-2794. PubMed ID: 28291738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of visibility of circumscribed masses on Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT) and 2D mammography: are circumscribed masses better visualized and assured of being benign on DBT?
    Nakashima K; Uematsu T; Itoh T; Takahashi K; Nishimura S; Hayashi T; Sugino T
    Eur Radiol; 2017 Feb; 27(2):570-577. PubMed ID: 27236817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Can the synthetic C view images be used in isolation for diagnosing breast malignancy without reviewing the entire digital breast tomosynthesis data set?
    Murphy MC; Coffey L; O'Neill AC; Quinn C; Prichard R; McNally S
    Ir J Med Sci; 2018 Nov; 187(4):1077-1081. PubMed ID: 29427198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A computational model to generate simulated three-dimensional breast masses.
    de Sisternes L; Brankov JG; Zysk AM; Schmidt RA; Nishikawa RM; Wernick MN
    Med Phys; 2015 Feb; 42(2):1098-118. PubMed ID: 25652522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Digital breast tomosynthesis versus mammography and breast ultrasound: a multireader performance study.
    Thibault F; Dromain C; Breucq C; Balleyguier CS; Malhaire C; Steyaert L; Tardivon A; Baldan E; Drevon H
    Eur Radiol; 2013 Sep; 23(9):2441-9. PubMed ID: 23673573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Automated Breast Density Computation in Digital Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: Influence on Mean Glandular Dose and BIRADS Density Categorization.
    Castillo-García M; Chevalier M; Garayoa J; Rodriguez-Ruiz A; García-Pinto D; Valverde J
    Acad Radiol; 2017 Jul; 24(7):802-810. PubMed ID: 28214227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Two-view and single-view tomosynthesis versus full-field digital mammography: high-resolution X-ray imaging observer study.
    Wallis MG; Moa E; Zanca F; Leifland K; Danielsson M
    Radiology; 2012 Mar; 262(3):788-96. PubMed ID: 22274840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of slice thickness on detectability in breast CT using a prewhitened matched filter and simulated mass lesions.
    Packard NJ; Abbey CK; Yang K; Boone JM
    Med Phys; 2012 Apr; 39(4):1818-30. PubMed ID: 22482604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Diagnostic value of the stand-alone synthetic image in digital breast tomosynthesis examinations.
    Garayoa J; Chevalier M; Castillo M; Mahillo-Fernández I; Amallal El Ouahabi N; Estrada C; Tejerina A; Benitez O; Valverde J
    Eur Radiol; 2018 Feb; 28(2):565-572. PubMed ID: 28812190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Computer simulations of case difficulty in digital breast tomosynthesis using virtual clinical trials.
    Barufaldi B; Vent TL; Bakic PR; Maidment ADA
    Med Phys; 2022 Apr; 49(4):2220-2232. PubMed ID: 35212403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Computer-aided detection of masses in digital tomosynthesis mammography: comparison of three approaches.
    Chan HP; Wei J; Zhang Y; Helvie MA; Moore RH; Sahiner B; Hadjiiski L; Kopans DB
    Med Phys; 2008 Sep; 35(9):4087-95. PubMed ID: 18841861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of a stationary digital breast tomosynthesis system to magnified 2D mammography using breast tissue specimens.
    Tucker AW; Calliste J; Gidcumb EM; Wu J; Kuzmiak CM; Hyun N; Zeng D; Lu J; Zhou O; Lee YZ
    Acad Radiol; 2014 Dec; 21(12):1547-52. PubMed ID: 25172412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Digital Breast Tomosynthesis for Upgraded BIRADS Scoring towards the True Pathology of Lesions Detected by Contrast-Enhanced Mammography.
    Grubstein A; Friehmann T; Dahan M; Abitbol C; Gadiel I; Schejtman DM; Shochat T; Atar E; Tamir S
    Tomography; 2024 May; 10(5):806-815. PubMed ID: 38787021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Visual-search observers for assessing tomographic x-ray image quality.
    Gifford HC; Liang Z; Das M
    Med Phys; 2016 Mar; 43(3):1563-75. PubMed ID: 26936739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Digital breast tomosynthesis versus digital mammography: a clinical performance study.
    Gennaro G; Toledano A; di Maggio C; Baldan E; Bezzon E; La Grassa M; Pescarini L; Polico I; Proietti A; Toffoli A; Muzzio PC
    Eur Radiol; 2010 Jul; 20(7):1545-53. PubMed ID: 20033175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of a variable dose acquisition technique for microcalcification and mass detection in digital breast tomosynthesis.
    Das M; Gifford HC; O'Connor JM; Glick SJ
    Med Phys; 2009 Jun; 36(6):1976-84. PubMed ID: 19610286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.