443 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25086558)
1. Evaluating the utility of intraprocedural 3D TRUS image information in guiding registration for displacement compensation during prostate biopsy.
De Silva T; Cool DW; Romagnoli C; Fenster A; Ward AD
Med Phys; 2014 Aug; 41(8):082901. PubMed ID: 25086558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. 2D-3D rigid registration to compensate for prostate motion during 3D TRUS-guided biopsy.
De Silva T; Fenster A; Cool DW; Gardi L; Romagnoli C; Samarabandu J; Ward AD
Med Phys; 2013 Feb; 40(2):022904. PubMed ID: 23387775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessment of image registration accuracy in three-dimensional transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy.
Karnik VV; Fenster A; Bax J; Cool DW; Gardi L; Gyacskov I; Romagnoli C; Ward AD
Med Phys; 2010 Feb; 37(2):802-13. PubMed ID: 20229890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Real-time registration of 3D to 2D ultrasound images for image-guided prostate biopsy.
Gillies DJ; Gardi L; De Silva T; Zhao SR; Fenster A
Med Phys; 2017 Sep; 44(9):4708-4723. PubMed ID: 28666058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Robust 2-D-3-D Registration Optimization for Motion Compensation During 3-D TRUS-Guided Biopsy Using Learned Prostate Motion Data.
De Silva T; Cool DW; Yuan J; Romagnoli C; Samarabandu J; Fenster A; Ward AD
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2017 Oct; 36(10):2010-2020. PubMed ID: 28499993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Magnetic resonance imaging-targeted, 3D transrectal ultrasound-guided fusion biopsy for prostate cancer: Quantifying the impact of needle delivery error on diagnosis.
Martin PR; Cool DW; Romagnoli C; Fenster A; Ward AD
Med Phys; 2014 Jul; 41(7):073504. PubMed ID: 24989418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Adaptation of a 3D prostate cancer atlas for transrectal ultrasound guided target-specific biopsy.
Narayanan R; Werahera PN; Barqawi A; Crawford ED; Shinohara K; Simoneau AR; Suri JS
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Oct; 53(20):N397-406. PubMed ID: 18827317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Biomechanical modeling constrained surface-based image registration for prostate MR guided TRUS biopsy.
van de Ven WJ; Hu Y; Barentsz JO; Karssemeijer N; Barratt D; Huisman HJ
Med Phys; 2015 May; 42(5):2470-81. PubMed ID: 25979040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of intersession 3D-TRUS to 3D-TRUS image registration for repeat prostate biopsies.
Karnik VV; Fenster A; Bax J; Romagnoli C; Ward AD
Med Phys; 2011 Apr; 38(4):1832-43. PubMed ID: 21626917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Three-dimensional prostate segmentation using level set with shape constraint based on rotational slices for 3D end-firing TRUS guided biopsy.
Qiu W; Yuan J; Ukwatta E; Tessier D; Fenster A
Med Phys; 2013 Jul; 40(7):072903. PubMed ID: 23822454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Technique for a hybrid system of real-time transrectal ultrasound with preoperative magnetic resonance imaging in the guidance of targeted prostate biopsy.
Ukimura O; Hirahara N; Fujihara A; Yamada T; Iwata T; Kamoi K; Okihara K; Ito H; Nishimura T; Miki T
Int J Urol; 2010 Oct; 17(10):890-3. PubMed ID: 20812938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Quantification of prostate deformation due to needle insertion during TRUS-guided biopsy: comparison of hand-held and mechanically stabilized systems.
De Silva T; Fenster A; Bax J; Romagnoli C; Izawa J; Samarabandu J; Ward AD
Med Phys; 2011 Mar; 38(3):1718-31. PubMed ID: 21520885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. 3D prostate histology reconstruction: an evaluation of image-based and fiducial-based algorithms.
Gibson E; Gaed M; Gómez JA; Moussa M; Romagnoli C; Pautler S; Chin JL; Crukley C; Bauman GS; Fenster A; Ward AD
Med Phys; 2013 Sep; 40(9):093501. PubMed ID: 24007184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Rotationally resliced 3D prostate TRUS segmentation using convex optimization with shape priors.
Qiu W; Yuan J; Ukwatta E; Fenster A
Med Phys; 2015 Feb; 42(2):877-91. PubMed ID: 25652500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Hybrid 2D-3D ultrasound registration for navigated prostate biopsy.
Selmi SY; Promayon E; Troccaz J
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2018 Jul; 13(7):987-995. PubMed ID: 29557082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparison of prostate tumor targeting strategies using magnetic resonance imaging-targeted, transrectal ultrasound-guided fusion biopsy.
Martin PR; Cool DW; Fenster A; Ward AD
Med Phys; 2018 Mar; 45(3):1018-1028. PubMed ID: 29363762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Improving 2D-3D registration optimization using learned prostate motion data.
De Silva T; Cool DW; Yuan J; Romognoli C; Fenster A; Ward AD
Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2013; 16(Pt 2):124-31. PubMed ID: 24579132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Automatic prostate segmentation using deep learning on clinically diverse 3D transrectal ultrasound images.
Orlando N; Gillies DJ; Gyacskov I; Romagnoli C; D'Souza D; Fenster A
Med Phys; 2020 Jun; 47(6):2413-2426. PubMed ID: 32166768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. 3D prostate model formation from non-parallel 2D ultrasound biopsy images.
Cool D; Downey D; Izawa J; Chin J; Fenster A
Med Image Anal; 2006 Dec; 10(6):875-87. PubMed ID: 17097333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Needle segmentation using 3D Hough transform in 3D TRUS guided prostate transperineal therapy.
Qiu W; Yuchi M; Ding M; Tessier D; Fenster A
Med Phys; 2013 Apr; 40(4):042902. PubMed ID: 23556924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
