143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25086679)
21. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging in screening detected microcalcification lesions of the breast: is there any value?
Uematsu T; Yuen S; Kasami M; Uchida Y
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2007 Jul; 103(3):269-81. PubMed ID: 17063274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Breast imaging: dual-energy projection radiography with digital radiography.
Asaga T; Chiyasu S; Mastuda S; Mastuura H; Kato H; Ishida M; Komaki T
Radiology; 1987 Sep; 164(3):869-70. PubMed ID: 3303124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Initial clinical experience with contrast-enhanced digital breast tomosynthesis.
Chen SC; Carton AK; Albert M; Conant EF; Schnall MD; Maidment AD
Acad Radiol; 2007 Feb; 14(2):229-38. PubMed ID: 17236995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Evaluation of contrast-enhanced digital mammography.
Diekmann F; Freyer M; Diekmann S; Fallenberg EM; Fischer T; Bick U; Pöllinger A
Eur J Radiol; 2011 Apr; 78(1):112-21. PubMed ID: 19931350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Development of silica-encapsulated silver nanoparticles as contrast agents intended for dual-energy mammography.
Karunamuni R; Naha PC; Lau KC; Al-Zaki A; Popov AV; Delikatny EJ; Tsourkas A; Cormode DP; Maidment AD
Eur Radiol; 2016 Sep; 26(9):3301-9. PubMed ID: 26910906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Contrast-enhanced Mammography: State of the Art.
Jochelson MS; Lobbes MBI
Radiology; 2021 Apr; 299(1):36-48. PubMed ID: 33650905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Including the effect of motion artifacts in noise and performance analysis of dual-energy contrast-enhanced mammography.
Allec N; Abbaszadeh S; Scott CC; Lewin JM; Karim KS
Phys Med Biol; 2012 Dec; 57(24):8405-25. PubMed ID: 23202244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Digital mammography: novel applications.
Rafferty EA
Radiol Clin North Am; 2007 Sep; 45(5):831-43, vii. PubMed ID: 17888772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Fusion of contrast-enhanced breast MR and mammographic imaging data.
Behrenbruch CP; Marias K; Armitage PA; Yam M; Moore NR; English RE; Clarke PJ; Leong FJ; Brady JM
Br J Radiol; 2004; 77 Spec No 2():S201-8. PubMed ID: 15677362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [Dual-energy subtraction radiography of the breast].
Asaga T; Masuzawa C; Kawahara S; Motohashi H; Okamoto T; Tamura N
Nihon Geka Gakkai Zasshi; 1988 Jun; 89(6):931-7. PubMed ID: 3054475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Tissue Cancellation in Dual Energy Mammography Using a Calibration Phantom Customized for Direct Mapping.
Han S; Kang DG
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2014 Jan; 33(1):74-84. PubMed ID: 24043372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The Future of Contrast-Enhanced Mammography.
Covington MF; Pizzitola VJ; Lorans R; Pockaj BA; Northfelt DW; Appleton CM; Patel BK
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Feb; 210(2):292-300. PubMed ID: 29064748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Emerging technologies in breast cancer detection.
Smith AP; Hall PA; Marcello DM
Radiol Manage; 2004; 26(4):16-24; quiz 25-7. PubMed ID: 15377106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Digital mammography: are there advantages in screening for breast cancer?
Nees AV
Acad Radiol; 2008 Apr; 15(4):401-7. PubMed ID: 18342763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Breast lesions: imaging with contrast-enhanced subharmonic US--initial experience.
Forsberg F; Piccoli CW; Merton DA; Palazzo JJ; Hall AL
Radiology; 2007 Sep; 244(3):718-26. PubMed ID: 17690324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Contrast-enhanced mammography: past, present, and future.
Sogani J; Mango VL; Keating D; Sung JS; Jochelson MS
Clin Imaging; 2021 Jan; 69():269-279. PubMed ID: 33032103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Contrast-Enhanced Spectral Mammography in Breast Imaging.
Lancaster RB; Gulla S; De Los Santos J; Umphrey HR
Semin Roentgenol; 2018 Oct; 53(4):294-300. PubMed ID: 30449347
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Contrast-enhanced MR mammography for evaluation of the contralateral breast in patients with diagnosed unilateral breast cancer or high-risk lesions.
Pediconi F; Catalano C; Roselli A; Padula S; Altomari F; Moriconi E; Pronio AM; Kirchin MA; Passariello R
Radiology; 2007 Jun; 243(3):670-80. PubMed ID: 17446524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Contrast-enhanced digital mammography: initial clinical experience.
Jong RA; Yaffe MJ; Skarpathiotakis M; Shumak RS; Danjoux NM; Gunesekara A; Plewes DB
Radiology; 2003 Sep; 228(3):842-50. PubMed ID: 12881585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Single-shot dual-energy subtraction mammography with electronic spectrum splitting: feasibility.
Bornefalk H; Lewin JM; Danielsson M; Lundqvist M
Eur J Radiol; 2006 Nov; 60(2):275-8. PubMed ID: 17049196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
