These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25086831)

  • 1. Intraocular pressure measurement with ocular response analyzer over soft contact lens.
    Sapkota K; Franco S; Lira M
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2014 Dec; 37(6):415-9. PubMed ID: 25086831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of the intraocular pressure measured with the ocular response analyzer.
    Ogbuehi KC; Almubrad TM
    Curr Eye Res; 2010 Jul; 35(7):587-96. PubMed ID: 20597645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Goldmann applanation tonometry versus ocular response analyzer for intraocular pressure measurements in keratoconic eyes.
    Goldich Y; Barkana Y; Avni I; Zadok D
    Cornea; 2010 Sep; 29(9):1011-5. PubMed ID: 20539214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Changes in intraocular pressure values measured with noncontact tonometer (NCT), ocular response analyzer (ORA) and corvis scheimpflug technology tonometer (CST) in the early phase after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE).
    Shen Y; Su X; Liu X; Miao H; Fang X; Zhou X
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2016 Nov; 16(1):205. PubMed ID: 27863469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influence of ocular pulse amplitude on ocular response analyzer measurements.
    Xu G; Lam DS; Leung CK
    J Glaucoma; 2011 Aug; 20(6):344-9. PubMed ID: 20852442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Repeatability of intraocular pressure and corneal biomechanical properties measurements by the ocular response analyser.
    Kynigopoulos M; Schlote T; Kotecha A; Tzamalis A; Pajic B; Haefliger I
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2008 May; 225(5):357-60. PubMed ID: 18454372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of intraocular pressure measured by ocular response analyzer and Goldmann applanation tonometer after corneal refractive surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Zhang H; Sun Z; Li L; Sun R; Zhang H
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2020 Jan; 20(1):23. PubMed ID: 31924174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effects of Valsalva manoeuvre on Ocular Response Analyzer measurements.
    Palamar M; Dag MY; Yagci A
    Clin Exp Optom; 2015 Sep; 98(5):447-50. PubMed ID: 26390907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Corneal biomechanical properties: precision and influence on tonometry.
    Ogbuehi KC; Osuagwu UL
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2014 Jun; 37(3):124-31. PubMed ID: 24121009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Tonometry by Ocular Response Analyzer in Keratoconic and Warpage Eyes in Comparison with Normal Eyes.
    Alipour F; Hassanpoor N; Letafatnejad M; Beheshtnejad AH; Mohammadi SF
    J Curr Ophthalmol; 2021; 33(2):118-123. PubMed ID: 34409220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of thin, thick, and normal corneas on Goldmann intraocular pressure measurements and correction formulae in individual eyes.
    Park SJ; Ang GS; Nicholas S; Wells AP
    Ophthalmology; 2012 Mar; 119(3):443-9. PubMed ID: 22035576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Intraocular pressure measurement precision with the Goldmann applanation, dynamic contour, and ocular response analyzer tonometers.
    Kotecha A; White E; Schlottmann PG; Garway-Heath DF
    Ophthalmology; 2010 Apr; 117(4):730-7. PubMed ID: 20122737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Relationship between corneal biomechanical properties, central corneal thickness, and intraocular pressure across the spectrum of glaucoma.
    Kaushik S; Pandav SS; Banger A; Aggarwal K; Gupta A
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2012 May; 153(5):840-849.e2. PubMed ID: 22310080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accurate intraocular pressure measurement in contact lens wearers with normal pressures.
    Lim L; Ng TP; Tan DT
    CLAO J; 1997 Apr; 23(2):130-3. PubMed ID: 9108980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Modifications in corneal biomechanics and intraocular pressure after deep sclerectomy.
    Iordanidou V; Hamard P; Gendron G; Labbé A; Raphael M; Baudouin C
    J Glaucoma; 2010; 19(4):252-6. PubMed ID: 19661821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Corneal hysteresis and intraocular pressure measurement in children using the reichert ocular response analyzer.
    Kirwan C; O'Keefe M; Lanigan B
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2006 Dec; 142(6):990-2. PubMed ID: 17157583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Corneal-compensated intraocular pressure, Goldmann-correlated intraocular pressure and their associated factors in the geriatric population, a population-based study.
    Shokrollahzadeh F; Hashemi H; Yekta A; Ostadimoghaddam H; Jafarzadehpour E; Khabazkhoob M
    Int Ophthalmol; 2022 Jul; 42(7):2085-2092. PubMed ID: 34981293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Accuracy of Goldmann, ocular response analyser, Pascal and TonoPen XL tonometry in keratoconic and normal eyes.
    Mollan SP; Wolffsohn JS; Nessim M; Laiquzzaman M; Sivakumar S; Hartley S; Shah S
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2008 Dec; 92(12):1661-5. PubMed ID: 18757471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The influence of lens power and center thickness on the intraocular pressure measured through soft lenses: a comparison of two noncontact tonometers.
    Ogbuehi KC
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2012 Jun; 35(3):118-28. PubMed ID: 22322110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of central corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis on tonometry as measured by dynamic contour tonometry, ocular response analyzer, and Goldmann tonometry in glaucomatous eyes.
    Hager A; Loge K; Schroeder B; Füllhas MO; Wiegand W
    J Glaucoma; 2008 Aug; 17(5):361-5. PubMed ID: 18703945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.