465 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25086899)
1. Five-year follow-up of minimally invasive computer assisted total knee arthroplasty (MICATKA) versus conventional computer assisted total knee arthroplasty (CATKA) - A population matched study.
Khakha RS; Chowdhry M; Norris M; Kheiran A; Patel N; Chauhan SK
Knee; 2014 Oct; 21(5):944-8. PubMed ID: 25086899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Computer-assisted minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty compared with standard total knee arthroplasty. A prospective, randomized study.
Dutton AQ; Yeo SJ; Yang KY; Lo NN; Chia KU; Chong HC
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2008 Jan; 90(1):2-9. PubMed ID: 18171951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of blood loss in minimally invasive surgery with and without electromagnetic computer navigation in total knee arthroplasty.
Thiengwittayaporn S; Junsee D; Tanavalee A
J Med Assoc Thai; 2009 Dec; 92 Suppl 6():S27-32. PubMed ID: 20120662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Computer-navigated versus conventional total knee arthroplasty a prospective randomized trial.
Kim YH; Park JW; Kim JS
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2012 Nov; 94(22):2017-24. PubMed ID: 23052635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Mechanical accuracy of navigated minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty (MIS TKA).
Biasca N; Wirth S; Bungartz M
Knee; 2009 Jan; 16(1):22-9. PubMed ID: 19070495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prospective non-randomized comparative clinical outcome of computer assisted total knee arthroplasty with and without a minimally invasive approach.
Leelasestaporn C
J Med Assoc Thai; 2011 Sep; 94(9):1089-95. PubMed ID: 21970198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Minimal invasive and computer-assisted total knee replacement compared with the minimal invasive technique: a prospective, randomized trial with short-term outcomes.
Zhang Z; Gu B; Zhu W; Zhu L; Li Q; Du Y
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2014 Jan; 134(1):65-71. PubMed ID: 24202408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty using mini midvastus or medial parapatellar approach technique: A prospective, randomized, international multicentre trial.
Feczko P; Engelmann L; Arts JJ; Campbell D
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2016 Jan; 17():19. PubMed ID: 26762175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparative study between computer assisted-navigation and conventional technique in minimally invasive surgery total knee arthroplasty, prospective control study.
Chotanaphuti T; Ongnamthip P; Teeraleekul K; Kraturerk C
J Med Assoc Thai; 2008 Sep; 91(9):1382-8. PubMed ID: 18843868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparison of early clinical outcome in computer assisted surgery and conventional technique in minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty.
Chaiyakit P; Hongku N; Meknavin S
J Med Assoc Thai; 2009 Dec; 92 Suppl 6():S91-6. PubMed ID: 20120669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. 10-Year patient satisfaction compared between computer-assisted navigation and conventional techniques in minimally invasive surgery total knee arthroplasty.
Khuangsirikul S; Lekkreusuwan K; Chotanaphuti T
Comput Assist Surg (Abingdon); 2016 Dec; 21(1):172-175. PubMed ID: 27973967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Computer-assisted minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty compared with standard total knee arthroplasty. Surgical technique.
Dutton AQ; Yeo SJ
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2009 Mar; 91 Suppl 2 Pt 1():116-30. PubMed ID: 19255204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Computer assisted versus conventional total knee replacement: a comparison of tourniquet time, blood loss and length of stay.
Ajwani SH; Jones M; Jarratt JW; Shepard GJ; Ryan WG
Knee; 2012 Oct; 19(5):606-10. PubMed ID: 22197632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Navigated shorter incision or smaller implant in knee arthritis?
Confalonieri N; Manzotti A; Pullen C
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2007 Oct; 463():63-7. PubMed ID: 17589366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty; a pragmatic randomised controlled trial reporting outcomes up to 2 year follow up.
Tasker A; Hassaballa M; Murray J; Lancaster S; Artz N; Harries W; Porteous A
Knee; 2014 Jan; 21(1):189-93. PubMed ID: 23972565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Results of computer assisted mini-incision subvastus approach for total knee arthroplasty.
Turajane T; Larbpaiboonpong V; Kongtharvonskul J; Maungsiri S
J Med Assoc Thai; 2009 Dec; 92 Suppl 6():S51-8. PubMed ID: 20120665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Mini-subvastus versus medial parapatellar approach for total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized controlled study.
Li Z; Cheng W; Sun L; Yao Y; Cao Q; Ye S; Qi L; Xu S; Wu X; Jing J
Int Orthop; 2018 Mar; 42(3):543-549. PubMed ID: 29199379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparative study of computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty after opening wedge osteotomy versus after unicompartmental arthroplasty.
Pailhé R; Cognault J; Massfelder J; Sharma A; Rouchy RC; Rubens-Duval B; Saragaglia D
Bone Joint J; 2016 Dec; 98-B(12):1620-1624. PubMed ID: 27909123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of Midterm Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Computer-Assisted vs Minimally Invasive Jig-Based Total Knee Arthroplasty.
Hasegawa M; Miyazaki S; Yamaguchi T; Wakabayashi H; Sudo A
J Arthroplasty; 2017 Jan; 32(1):43-46. PubMed ID: 27503697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparative study on early period of recovery between minimally invasive surgery total knee arthroplasty and minimally invasive surgery-quadriceps sparing total knee arthroplasty in Chinese patients.
Yu JK; Yu CL; Ao YF; Gong X; Wang YJ; Wang S; Xing X; Chen LX; Ju XD
Chin Med J (Engl); 2008 Aug; 121(15):1353-7. PubMed ID: 18959108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
