464 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25086899)
21. Computer-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty: Is There a Difference Between Image-Based and Imageless Techniques?
Tabatabaee RM; Rasouli MR; Maltenfort MG; Fuino R; Restrepo C; Oliashirazi A
J Arthroplasty; 2018 Apr; 33(4):1076-1081. PubMed ID: 29223404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. A Comparison of Short-Term Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Computer-Assisted vs Minimally Invasive Conventional Instrumentation for Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Alcelik IA; Blomfield MI; Diana G; Gibbon AJ; Carrington N; Burr S
J Arthroplasty; 2016 Feb; 31(2):410-8. PubMed ID: 26507525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Midterm outcomes of electromagnetic computer-assisted navigation in minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty.
Thiengwittayaporn S; Kanjanapiboonwong A; Junsee D
J Orthop Surg Res; 2013 Oct; 8():37. PubMed ID: 24161011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A prospective study comparing the functional outcome of computer-assisted and conventional total knee replacement.
Hoffart HE; Langenstein E; Vasak N
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2012 Feb; 94(2):194-9. PubMed ID: 22323685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Total knee arthroplasty performed with either a mini-subvastus or a standard approach: a prospective randomized controlled study with a minimum follow-up of 2 years.
Lai Z; Shi S; Fei J; Wei W
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2014 Aug; 134(8):1155-62. PubMed ID: 24595613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Comparison between computer-assisted-navigation and conventional total knee arthroplasties in patients undergoing simultaneous bilateral procedures: a randomized clinical trial.
Zhang GQ; Chen JY; Chai W; Liu M; Wang Y
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2011 Jul; 93(13):1190-6. PubMed ID: 21776571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty: comparison of jig-based technique versus computer navigation for clinical and alignment outcome.
Hasegawa M; Yoshida K; Wakabayashi H; Sudo A
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2011 Jun; 19(6):904-10. PubMed ID: 20811732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The advantages of computer assistance in total knee arthroplasty.
Bar MC; Daubresse F; Hugon S
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc; 2011; 45(3):185-9. PubMed ID: 21765232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Superior alignment but no difference in clinical outcome after minimally invasive computer-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (MICA-UKA).
Zhang Z; Zhu W; Zhu L; Du Y
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2016 Nov; 24(11):3419-3424. PubMed ID: 25423875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Functional outcome and alignment in computer-assisted and conventionally operated total knee replacements: a multicentre parallel-group randomised controlled trial.
Gøthesen O; Espehaug B; Havelin LI; Petursson G; Hallan G; Strøm E; Dyrhovden G; Furnes O
Bone Joint J; 2014 May; 96-B(5):609-18. PubMed ID: 24788494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Comparison of functional results with navigation-assisted minimally invasive and conventional techniques in bilateral total knee arthroplasty.
Seon JK; Song EK; Yoon TR; Park SJ; Bae BH; Cho SG
Comput Aided Surg; 2007 May; 12(3):189-93. PubMed ID: 17538792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Computer-assisted stereotaxic navigation improves the accuracy of mechanical alignment and component positioning in total knee arthroplasty.
Liow MH; Goh GS; Pang HN; Tay DK; Lo NN; Yeo SJ
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2016 Aug; 136(8):1173-80. PubMed ID: 27349233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparison of the clinical and radiological outcomes of three minimally invasive techniques for total knee replacement at two years.
Lin SY; Chen CH; Fu YC; Huang PJ; Lu CC; Su JY; Chang JK; Huang HT
Bone Joint J; 2013 Jul; 95-B(7):906-10. PubMed ID: 23814241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Computer navigation versus conventional implantation for varus knee total arthroplasty: a case-control study at 5 years follow-up.
Molfetta L; Caldo D
Knee; 2008 Mar; 15(2):75-9. PubMed ID: 18234498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Minimally invasive and computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty versus conventional technique: a prospective, randomized study.
Zhang Z; Gu B; Zhu W; Zhu L; Li Q; Du Y
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2014 Dec; 24(8):1475-9. PubMed ID: 24052416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Comparison of minimally invasive unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with or without a navigation system.
Seon JK; Song EK; Park SJ; Yoon TR; Lee KB; Jung ST
J Arthroplasty; 2009 Apr; 24(3):351-7. PubMed ID: 18534460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Computer navigation-assisted versus minimally invasive TKA: benefits and drawbacks.
Bonutti PM; Dethmers D; Ulrich SD; Seyler TM; Mont MA
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2008 Nov; 466(11):2756-62. PubMed ID: 18815850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Minimally Invasive Computer-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty Compared With Conventional Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective 9-Year Follow-Up.
Zhu M; Ang CL; Yeo SJ; Lo NN; Chia SL; Chong HC
J Arthroplasty; 2016 May; 31(5):1000-4. PubMed ID: 26725133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Minimally invasive computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty.
Biasca N; Schneider TO; Bungartz M
Orthop Clin North Am; 2009 Oct; 40(4):537-63, x. PubMed ID: 19773060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Improved accuracy of component alignment with the implementation of image-free navigation in total knee arthroplasty.
Rosenberger RE; Hoser C; Quirbach S; Attal R; Hennerbichler A; Fink C
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2008 Mar; 16(3):249-57. PubMed ID: 18157493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
