BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25086951)

  • 1. CADe for early detection of breast cancer-current status and why we need to continue to explore new approaches.
    Nishikawa RM; Gur D
    Acad Radiol; 2014 Oct; 21(10):1320-1. PubMed ID: 25086951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Computed-aided diagnosis (CAD) in the detection of breast cancer.
    Dromain C; Boyer B; Ferré R; Canale S; Delaloge S; Balleyguier C
    Eur J Radiol; 2013 Mar; 82(3):417-23. PubMed ID: 22939365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Computer-aided detection/diagnosis of breast cancer in mammography and ultrasound: a review.
    Jalalian A; Mashohor SB; Mahmud HR; Saripan MI; Ramli AR; Karasfi B
    Clin Imaging; 2013; 37(3):420-6. PubMed ID: 23153689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparing mammographic images.
    Angelo MF; Patrocinio AC; Schiabel H; Medeiros RB; Pires SR
    IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag; 2008; 27(3):74-81. PubMed ID: 18519185
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Computer technology in detection and staging of prostate carcinoma: a review.
    Zhu Y; Williams S; Zwiggelaar R
    Med Image Anal; 2006 Apr; 10(2):178-99. PubMed ID: 16150630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A simple and robust classification tree for differentiation between benign and malignant lesions in MR-mammography.
    Baltzer PA; Dietzel M; Gröschel T; Kaiser WA
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Sep; 81 Suppl 1():S4-5. PubMed ID: 23083596
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. CAD in questions/answers Review of the literature.
    Boyer B; Balleyguier C; Granat O; Pharaboz C
    Eur J Radiol; 2009 Jan; 69(1):24-33. PubMed ID: 18977103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Co-registration of MR-mammography and X-ray mammography.
    Dietzel M; Baltzer PA; Hopp T; Ruiter NV; Kaiser WA
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Sep; 81 Suppl 1():S27-9. PubMed ID: 23083591
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Application of computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) in MR-mammography (MRM): do we really need whole lesion time curve distribution analysis?
    Baltzer PA; Renz DM; Kullnig PE; Gajda M; Camara O; Kaiser WA
    Acad Radiol; 2009 Apr; 16(4):435-42. PubMed ID: 19268855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Diffusion weighted MR imaging of the breast.
    Abdel Razek AA; Gaballa G; Denewer A; Tawakol I
    Acad Radiol; 2010 Mar; 17(3):382-6. PubMed ID: 20004597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical MR-mammography: are computer-assisted methods superior to visual or manual measurements for curve type analysis? A systematic approach.
    Baltzer PA; Freiberg C; Beger S; Vag T; Dietzel M; Herzog AB; Gajda M; Camara O; Kaiser WA
    Acad Radiol; 2009 Sep; 16(9):1070-6. PubMed ID: 19523854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. New opportunities in computer-aided diagnosis: change detection and characterization.
    Khorasani R; Erickson BJ; Patriarche J
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2006 Jun; 3(6):468-9. PubMed ID: 17412102
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. What's the control in studies measuring the effect of computer-aided detection (CAD) on observer performance?
    Obuchowski NA; Meziane M; Dachman AH; Lieber ML; Mazzone PJ
    Acad Radiol; 2010 Jun; 17(6):761-7. PubMed ID: 20457419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Volumetric breast density estimation from full-field digital mammograms.
    van Engeland S; Snoeren PR; Huisman H; Boetes C; Karssemeijer N
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2006 Mar; 25(3):273-82. PubMed ID: 16524084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Geometric interpretations of the relation between the image of the absolute conic and sphere images.
    Ying X; Zha H
    IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell; 2006 Dec; 28(12):2031-6. PubMed ID: 17108376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Breast lesion co-localisation between X-ray and MR images using finite element modelling.
    Lee AW; Rajagopal V; Babarenda Gamage TP; Doyle AJ; Nielsen PM; Nash MP
    Med Image Anal; 2013 Dec; 17(8):1256-64. PubMed ID: 23860392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Hybrid detectors for subpixel targets.
    Broadwater J; Chellappa R
    IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell; 2007 Nov; 29(11):1891-903. PubMed ID: 17848772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Biologically derived companding algorithm for high dynamic range mammography images.
    Kanelovitch L; Itzchak Y; Rundstein A; Sklair M; Spitzer H
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2013 Aug; 60(8):2253-61. PubMed ID: 23508248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Glasses removal from facial image using recursive error compensation.
    Park JS; Oh YH; Ahn SC; Lee SW
    IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell; 2005 May; 27(5):805-11. PubMed ID: 15875801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Face recognition algorithms surpass humans matching faces over changes in illumination.
    O'Toole AJ; Jonathon Phillips P; Jiang F; Ayyad J; Penard N; Abdi H
    IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell; 2007 Sep; 29(9):1642-6. PubMed ID: 17627050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.